|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Trends and management
Reference:
Rozin V.M.
The three stages of the formation a technology in modern culture
// Trends and management.
2015. № 4.
P. 336-347.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0730.2015.4.17111 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17111
Три этапа формирования технологии в культуре нового времени
Rozin Vadim Markovich
Doctor of Philosophy
Chief Scientific Associate, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
109240, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12 str.1, kab. 310
|
rozinvm@gmail.com
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0730.2015.4.17111
Received:
27-11-2015
Published:
1-6-2015
Abstract:
The article introduces the distinction between the concepts of technics and technology. It is shown that technology goes through three main stages of development. The first stage is unanimously associated with the culture of Antiquity and the Middle Ages part, whentechnology could be described as a form of magic. The preconditions for the second stagerise from antiquity and the Middle Ages as new technics emerge primarily in XVI-XVIII centuries, dubbed engineering. The third stage, mainly situated in the XIX and XX centuries, involves the formation of technology. Originally formed as "technology in the narrow sense," mainly involving the technical work carried out withinin industrial production and bourgeois competition. Then "technology in the broadest sense" or "technology of major techno-social projects," emerged. The final stage is the formation of a "global technology". The author offers description and evaluation of e ach type of technoogy, as well as a comparative analysis of different kinds of work and practice, situational analysis and problematization, case studies. As a result, the author is able to show the difference and the interconnection between technics and technology, the main stages of their development, influenced by social and cultural factors and conditions. Thus, the author solves a number of long-standing problems of philosophy and history of technology. primarily in XVI-XVIII centuries
References
1. Grant D.P. Filosofiya, kul'tura i tekhnologiya: perspektivy na budushchee // Sotsial'nye problemy sovremennoi tekhniki (Preprint). IF RAN. M., 1986.
2. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tekhnologicheskaya karta.
3. Wig D. N. Techology, Phylosophy and Politics // Technology and politics. Daham, L., 1988.
4. Gorokhov V.G., Tekhnika i kul'tura: vozniknovenie filosofii tekhniki i teorii tekhnicheskogo tvorchestva v Rossii i Germanii v kontse XIX – nachale XX ctoletiya, M., «Logos», 2010.
5. Rozin V.M. Filosofiya tekhniki. Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. M., 2001.
6. Rozin V.M. Kul'turologiya. Uchebnik. 2-e izd. M., 2004.
7. Ogurtsov A.P. Telo // NFE. V 4-kh t. T. 4. M., 2001.
8. Bekon F. Novyi organon. M., 1935.
9. Engel'meier P.K. Filosofiya tekhniki. M., 1912. Vyp. 2.
10. Vygotskii L.S. Istoricheskii smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa // Sobr. soch.: V 6 t.-M., 1982. T. 1.
11. Ogurtsov A.P. Filosofiya nauki epokhi Prosveshcheniya. IF RAN. M., 1993.
12. Banse G., WollgastS. Biographien bedeutenderTechniker. Berlin, 1987.
13. http://neoconomica.ru/theory.php?id=221
14. Druker P.F. Zadachi menedzhmenta v XXI veke. Moskva*Sankt-Peterburg*Kiev, 2002.
15. Neretina S. S. Tropy i kontsepty. M., 1999.
16. Neretina S.S., Ogurtsov A.P. Kontsepty politicheskoi kul'tury. M., 2010.
17. Rozin V.M. Tekhnika i sotsial'nost'. Filosofskie razlicheniya i kontseptsii. M., 2011.
18. http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Sozdanie sovetskoi atomnoi bomby
19. http://webground.su/topic/2011/01/16/t174
20. Rozin V.M. Evolyutsiya inzhenernoi i proektnoi mysli. Inzheneriya: stanovlenie, razvitie, tipologiya. M., 2013. S. 120-142.
21. Popkova N.V. Filosofskaya kul'tura ili filosofskaya tekhnologiya? // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 133 - 144. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2015.2.14209.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|