Статья 'Три этапа формирования технологии в культуре нового времени ' - журнал 'Тренды и управление' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Trends and management
Reference:

Три этапа формирования технологии в культуре нового времени

Rozin Vadim Markovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Chief Scientific Associate, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences 

109240, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12 str.1, kab. 310

rozinvm@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0730.2015.4.17111

Received:

27-11-2015


Published:

1-6-2015


Abstract: The article introduces the distinction between the concepts of technics and technology. It is shown that technology goes through three main stages of development. The first stage is unanimously associated with the culture of Antiquity and the Middle Ages part, whentechnology could be described as a form of magic. The preconditions for the second stagerise from antiquity and the Middle Ages as new technics emerge primarily in XVI-XVIII centuries, dubbed engineering. The third stage, mainly situated in the XIX and XX centuries, involves the formation of technology. Originally formed as "technology in the narrow sense," mainly involving the technical work carried out withinin industrial production and bourgeois competition. Then "technology in the broadest sense" or "technology of major techno-social projects," emerged. The final stage is the formation of a "global technology". The author offers description and evaluation of e ach type of technoogy, as well as a comparative analysis of different kinds of work and practice, situational analysis and problematization, case studies. As a result, the author is able to show the difference and the interconnection between technics and technology, the main stages of their development, influenced by social and cultural factors and conditions. Thus, the author solves a number of long-standing problems of philosophy and history of technology. primarily in XVI-XVIII centuries


References
1. Grant D.P. Filosofiya, kul'tura i tekhnologiya: perspektivy na budushchee // Sotsial'nye problemy sovremennoi tekhniki (Preprint). IF RAN. M., 1986.
2. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tekhnologicheskaya karta.
3. Wig D. N. Techology, Phylosophy and Politics // Technology and politics. Daham, L., 1988.
4. Gorokhov V.G., Tekhnika i kul'tura: vozniknovenie filosofii tekhniki i teorii tekhnicheskogo tvorchestva v Rossii i Germanii v kontse XIX – nachale XX ctoletiya, M., «Logos», 2010.
5. Rozin V.M. Filosofiya tekhniki. Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. M., 2001.
6. Rozin V.M. Kul'turologiya. Uchebnik. 2-e izd. M., 2004.
7. Ogurtsov A.P. Telo // NFE. V 4-kh t. T. 4. M., 2001.
8. Bekon F. Novyi organon. M., 1935.
9. Engel'meier P.K. Filosofiya tekhniki. M., 1912. Vyp. 2.
10. Vygotskii L.S. Istoricheskii smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa // Sobr. soch.: V 6 t.-M., 1982. T. 1.
11. Ogurtsov A.P. Filosofiya nauki epokhi Prosveshcheniya. IF RAN. M., 1993.
12. Banse G., WollgastS. Biographien bedeutenderTechniker. Berlin, 1987.
13. http://neoconomica.ru/theory.php?id=221
14. Druker P.F. Zadachi menedzhmenta v XXI veke. Moskva*Sankt-Peterburg*Kiev, 2002.
15. Neretina S. S. Tropy i kontsepty. M., 1999.
16. Neretina S.S., Ogurtsov A.P. Kontsepty politicheskoi kul'tury. M., 2010.
17. Rozin V.M. Tekhnika i sotsial'nost'. Filosofskie razlicheniya i kontseptsii. M., 2011.
18. http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Sozdanie sovetskoi atomnoi bomby
19. http://webground.su/topic/2011/01/16/t174
20. Rozin V.M. Evolyutsiya inzhenernoi i proektnoi mysli. Inzheneriya: stanovlenie, razvitie, tipologiya. M., 2013. S. 120-142.
21. Popkova N.V. Filosofskaya kul'tura ili filosofskaya tekhnologiya? // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 133 - 144. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2015.2.14209.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.