Taxes and Taxation - rubric TOPIC: HONEST OR OFFENDING TAXPAYER: ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ïî
Taxes and Taxation
12+
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Council of editors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
MAIN PAGE > Journal "Taxes and Taxation" > Rubric "TOPIC: HONEST OR OFFENDING TAXPAYER: ASSESSMENT CRITERIA"
TOPIC: HONEST OR OFFENDING TAXPAYER: ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Frolova M.V. -
Abstract:
Veretilo A.A. -
Abstract:
Ansimova E.P. -
Abstract:
Tyutyugina A.V. -
Abstract:
. - Kratkaya predystoriya i sovremennoe sostoyanie problemnogo voprosa. pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Obzor materialov arbitrazhnoi praktiki, po nalogovym sporam svyazannym s neobkhodimost'yu ustanovleniya i otsenki dobroporyadochnosti nalogoplatel'shika. pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Ivashchenko N.S., Krasnov M.V. - Moment ispolneniya (dobrosovestnym) nalogoplatel'shchikom obyazannosti po uplate naloga. pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Pashkov K.Yu. - Ponyatie «dobrosovestnyi nalogoplatel'shchik» v rossiiskom nalogovom prave. pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Budylin S.L. - Nedobrosovestnost' nalogoplatel'shchika - pravovoe ponyatie ili... ? pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Sobolev M.Yu. - Mozhno li vesti deyatel'nost' cherez ofshornuyu firmu i ostat'sya dobroporyadochnym nalogoplatel'shchikom pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Blits-opros: «Mozhet li auditorskaya proverka podtverdit' dobrosovestnost' nalogoplatel'shchika?» pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Nuzhno li nalogoplatel'shchiku dokazyvat', chto on dobrosovestnyi? pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Kornaukhov M.V. - Kriterii «nedobrosovestnosti» nalogoplatel'shchika v arbitrazhnoi praktike pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Ignatov A.V. - K voprosu o dobrosovestnosti nalogoplatel'shchikov pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Avdeev B.V. - Nalogovye organy ne protiv nedobrosovestnykh nalogoplatel'shchikov pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Myakinina I.N. - Auditorskaya proverka - eto proverka dobrosovestnosti pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Nalogovaya dobrosovestnost' kak panatseya ot problem pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Razgulin S.V. - Dobrosovestnost' nalogoplatel'shchika kak prezumptsiya nalogovogo prava pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Kornaukhov M.V. - Problemy kontseptsii «zloupotrebleniya pravom» v nalogovykh pravootnosheniyakh pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Gadzhiev G.A. - O pravomernosti razgranicheniya zakonnoi i nezakonnoi nalogovoi optimizatsii v usloviyakh rossiiskogo nalogovogo zakonodatel'stva pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Nepesov K.A. - Dobrosovestnost' nalogoplatel'shchika kak uslovie peresmotra tseny sdelki pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Soyuzy dobrosovestnykh prezumptsii pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - O tselesoobraznosti primeneniya prezumptsii dobrosovestnosti sub''ekta v nalogovom prave pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Regional'nyi podkhod k dobrosovestnym nalogoplatel'shchikam pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Ponyatie «nedobrosovestnyi nalogoplatel'shchik» v sisteme nalogovogo administrirovaniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Nalogoplatel'shchiki bez sertifikata doveriya, s veshchami na vykhod! pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - «Real'nost' ponesennykh zatrat» kak paradigma resheniya problemy razgranicheniya ukloneniya ot uplaty nalogov i nalogovoi optimizatsii pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Kommentarii Postanovleniya Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 12.10.2006 g. N53 «Ob otsenke arbitrazhnymi sudami obosnovannosti polucheniya nalogoplatel'shchikami nalogovoi vygody» pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Postanovlenie VAS RF ot 12 oktyabrya 2006 g. N53 «Ob otsenke arbitrazhnymi sudami obosnovannosti polucheniya nalogoplatel'shchikom nalogovoi vygody» pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Nalogovaya vygoda v obmen na prezumptsiyu dobrosovestnosti pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Perspektivy razvitiya otechestvennogo nalogovogo prava v svete Postanovleniya VAS Rossii ot 12 oktyabrya 2006 goda N53 pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Proekt informatsionnogo pis'ma VAS RF «Ob otsenke arbitrazhnymi sudami predstavlyaemykh nalogovymi organami dokazatel'stv neobosnovannosti vozniknoveniya nalogovoi vygody u nalogoplatel'shchika» pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Popravki k proektu Federal'nogo zakona N181057-4 «O vnesenii izmenenii v chast' pervuyu Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s osushchestvleniem mer po sovershenstvovaniyu nalogovogo administrirovaniya», prinyatomu v pervom chtenii 7 oktyabrya 2005 goda (izvlechenie) pp. 0-0
Abstract:
. - Proekt informatsionnogo pis'ma VAS RF «Ob otsenke obstoyatel'stv, porozhdayushchikh somneniya v dobrosovestnosti nalogoplatel'shchika, pri razreshenii nalogovykh sporov v arbitrazhnykh sudakh» pp. 0-0
Abstract:
Dolgova, A. Yu. - About Some Peculiarities of Implementation of the Principle o Legality of Para-fi scal Charges in the Russian Federation pp. 58-65
Abstract: This paper examines various defi nitions and meanings of the term para-fi scal charge and justifi ed by the independence of the para-fi scal charge in the fi nancial system in Russia. The author reveals the specifi cs of establishing the principle of legality of the para-fi scal charges,ñconsidering the legal positions of Constitutional Court of Russia.
Keywords: parafi skality (para-fi scal charge), establishing the principle of legality, the analogy of law, the legal position of the Constitutional Court of Russia.
Tutugina, A. V. - Unprofi tability of an Enterprise as a Sign of Irresponsibility of a Taxpayer for the Purpose of Planning Field Tax Inspections and as a Source of Tax Risks for State Institutions and Taxpayers pp. 89-94
Abstract: Federal Tax Service of Russia has developed the Conception of Planning of Field Tax Trips. The Conception offers 12 criteria for selecting taxpayers to check. The present article contains critical analysis concerning the second, seventh and eleventh criteria of the Conception and suggests corrective measures to minimize tax risks for state institutions and responsible taxpayers.
Keywords: taxes and taxation, control, conceptions, criteria, losses, professional deductions, profi tability, planning, fi eld inspections, risks.
Nagornaya I., Nikiforov A. -

DOI:
10.7256/2454-065X.2014.9.12794

Abstract:
Nagornaya, I. I., Nikiforov, A. V. - Understanding the General Illegality of Action When Committing a Crime Described in Article 199.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation pp. 856-870

DOI:
10.7256/2454-065X.2014.9.65572

Abstract: The article is devoted to understanding the general (regulatory) illegality of action when a entity breaches its duties of a tax agent (Article 199.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). The authors of the article analyze objective and subjective factors of such understanding. They also study the influence of contradictory positions of the supreme judicial authorities and inferior courts as well as imperfection of the legislative language including technical errors in the legislation on an entity’s understanding the illegality of his action. Special attention is paid to the need for adaptation of entities to changing legislation and law-enforcement practice. The authors analyze legal cases on tax disputes and their role in establishing the fact of an entity’s conscience of a committed crime described in Article 199.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. They also study the positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the European Court on Human Rights as well as doctrinal arguments related to the problem of understanding the general illegality of action. The authors conclude that essential contradictions in the judicial practice may indicate that entities do not understand the general illegality of their action. The authors also emphasize the need for a more consistent interpretation of legislative provisions on taxes and levies by supreme courts. They also prove the need for explanations of the influence of this or that interpretation of legislative provisions on taxes and levies on the enforcement of a particular penal prohibition in decrees of the Plenum of Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.
Keywords: general illegality, understanding the general legality, tax agent, law-enforcement practice, interpretation of law, Tax Code, Criminal Code, Supreme Court, Arbitration Court, insufficient payment.
Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.