|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:
Vafin, A.M.
Political Marginality:
Concerning the Problem
of Types of Political Leadership
// Psychology and Psychotechnics.
2013. № 9.
P. 884-888.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63231
Vafin, A.M. Political Marginality:
Concerning the Problem
of Types of Political Leadership
Abstract:
In modern political theory it has already become customary to focus on such topics as political systems, ideologies
and political leadership. However, a whole range of issues within these topics are not analyzed. The phenomenon
of political marginality is one o such issues. The author of the article analyzes the phenomenon of political marginality
and leadership of political marginals. This phenomenon usually describes oppositional leaders who either try to limit
their opposition or, on the contrary, start confrontation with the political system. Political psychology usually views
political leaders as already established political agents even when they do not have any leadership skills. The author of
the article offers a description of different types of political marginals. The author achieves it by expanding the borders of political studies and addressing to modern researches of organizational psychology in transformational, i.e. constantly
changing leadership. Transformational leadership symbolizes a certain behavior of leaders that motives workers to
follow corporate targets and interests. As a result of his analysis, the author describes the two types of leaders: populist
leader and ideologically-driven leader.
Keywords:
manipulative ideologies, political psychology, organizational psychology, populism, transformational leadership, political leadership, political marginality, charisma, populist leader, ideologically-driven leader.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Andreev A. Politicheskaya psikhologiya. M., 2002.
2. Burd'e P. Sotsiologiya politiki. M., 1993.
3. Buruma I. Ubiystvo v Amsterdame: Smert' Teo van Goga i granitsy tolerantnosti. M., 2008.
4. Vafin A. Identichnost' i telo organizatsii: interaktsionistskiy podkhod k organizatsionnoy psikhologii // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2012. № 3.
5. Vafin A. Ideologiya v organizatsii: Psikhologicheskie igry v «liderov» i manipulyatsii «massami». M., 2013.
6. Veber M. Politika kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1990.
7. Griffin R. Ot slizevikov k rizome: vvedenie v teoriyu gruppuskulyarnoy pravoy // Verkhi i nizy russkogo natsionalizma. M., 2007.
8. Gurevich P.S. Kuda idesh', chelovek? // Znanie. 1991. № 7; Ego zhe: Gurevich P.S. Filosofskaya interpretatsiya cheloveka. M., 2013.
9. Dyuverzhe M. Politicheskie partii. M., 2007.
10. Krauch K. Postdemokratiya. M., 2010.
11. Meskon M.Kh., Al'bert M., Khedouri F. Osnovy menedzhmenta. M., 1998.
12. Moskovichi S. Nauka o massakh // Psikhologiya mass. Samara, 2010.
13. Ol'shanskiy D. Vozhdi i lidery. Vozhdizm // URL: http://psyfactor.org/lib/lider6.htm (Data obrashcheniya: 27.05.2013).
14. Otchet o zasedanii seminara «Politicheskie idei i ideologii v publichnoy sfere», Moskva, 6 aprelya 2011 g. Doklad M.A. Al'-Dayni // URL: http://rapn.ru/?grup=595&doc=3580 (Data obrashcheniya: 27.05.2013).
15. Politicheskiy protsess: osnovnye aspekty i sposoby analiza. M., 2001.
16. Pombeni P. Kharizmaticheskoe liderstvo mezhdu ideal'nym tipom i ideologiey (Referat) // Politicheskaya nauka. 2009. № 4.
17. Umland A. Tri raznovidnosti postsovetskogo fashizma. Kontseptual'nye i kontekstual'nye problemy in-terpretatsii sovremennogo russkogo ul'tranatsionalizma // Forum noveyshey vostochnoevropeyskoy istorii i kul'tury. 2006. № 2 // URL: http://www1.ku-eichstaett.de/ZIMOS/forum/docs/Umland6.pdf (27.05.2013).
18. Bernard C. Populism, Politics and Democracy // Democratization. 2005. Vol. 5. № 12.
19. Sarros J.C., Cooper B.K., Santora J.C. Building a Climate for Innovation Through Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture // Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2008. Vol. 15. № 2.
20. Vossen K. Populism in the Netherlands after Fortuyn: Rita Verdonk and Geert Wilders Compared // Perspectives on European Politics and Society. 2010. Vol. 11. № 1
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|