Статья 'Мифы безопасности как элемент политического сознания' - журнал 'Вопросы безопасности' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Security Issues
Reference:

Security myths as an element of political consciousness

Krasnyanskaya Tat'yana Maksimovna

Doctor of Psychology

doctor of psychological sciences, professor, professor of the department of general, social psychology and history of psychology, Moscow state university for the humanities (Moscow, Russia).

111395, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Yunosti, 5, aud. 318

ktm8@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Tylets Valerii Gennad'evich

Doctor of Psychology

professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology at Essentuki Branch of the Stavropol State Teachers' Training Institute

357635, Russia, Stavropol Region, Essentuki, str. Dolina Roz, 7

tyletsvalery@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7543.2017.3.21638

Review date:

07-01-2017


Publish date:

10-06-2017


Abstract: The research subject is security myths considered as an element of political consciousness of an individual or a society. Security myths are understood as a subject-specified type of mythological material, which, due to its pre-reflective reasonability, guarantees uncritical assumption of values, strategies and tactics in the sphere of security. The purpose of the study is to substantiate security myths as an essential element of political consciousness, constantly reproducing conventional truths in the sphere of security, but easily adapted to the modern conditions of its provision. The authors use theoretical analysis of the problem, including the logical procedures of analysis and synthesis, specification and generalization. The authors extrapolate general provisions, which reveal the nature of the phenomena of security and myth, on the problem field created in the process of security myths studying. The authors substantiate the necessity to consider security myths as an element of political consciousness, and formulate the introduction and the essential characteristic of the set of functions (information, orientation, identification, compensation, manipulation, and mobilization) realized by the phenomenon. Theoretical constructs and generalizations can serve as a basis for applied research revealing the peculiarities of security myths in political consciousness of various types of subjects. The authors introduce a security myth category into the development of a problem field of political psychology, and substantiate its fundamental positions as an element of political consciousness. The authors conclude about the possibility to introduce a mythological problematic into the research field of political psychology. 


Keywords: development, protection, subject, political consciousness, mythological material, myth, psychics, safety, society, fuctions
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Krasnyanskaya T.M., Tylets V.G. Vozmozhnosti stsenarnogo podkhoda v proektirovanii psikhologicheskoi bezopasnosti lichnosti // Psikholog. 2016. № 4. S. 67-78. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8701.2016.4.20087
2.
Krasnyanskaya T.M., Tylets V.G. Implementatsiya printsipa bezopasnosti v politicheskoi psikhologii // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. № 10. S.1421-1431. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.10.20611
3.
Tat'yanchenko N.P. Proektirovanie sistemy obespecheniya lichnoi bezopasnosti voennosluzhashchikh // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Sworld. 2012. T. 21. № 4. S. 36-39.
4.
Shubina O.N. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost' studentov v sotsial'nykh setyakh // Prioritetnye nauchnye napravleniya: ot teorii k praktike. 2016. № 25-1. S. 104-108.
5.
Lyakhov A.V., Tukova Zh.V. The problem of loneliness students with different priorities subektnosti protect // European Journal of Psychological Studies. 2015. № 2 (6). S. 75-80. DOI: 10.13187/ejps.2015.6.75
6.
Tyrsikova A.D. Strategii obespecheniya psikhologicheskoi bezopasnosti studentov vuza // Prikladnaya psikhologiya i psikhoanaliz. 2011. № 1. S. 4. URL: http://ppip.idnk.ru
7.
Lyakhov A.V., Gadgiahmedova S.G. Raising Valuable Resources of Individual Security to Resolve Students’ Conflicts by the Teacher // Zhurnal ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniya. 2015. № 5 (3). S. 116-122. DOI: 10.13187/Zhmnp.2015.5.116
8.
Tishkova E.S. Sub''ektivnoe atributirovanie suitsidal'nykh namerenii studentami s raznymi prioritetami lichnoi bezopasnosti // Psikhologiya, sotsiologiya i pedagogika. 2015. № 5 (44). S. 57-63.
9.
Kutovoy I.N., Kasharokova O.A. The relationship of shared values and the values of safety in the structure of the person of students of high school // Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii. 2015. №3 (5). S. 200-205. DOI: 10.13187/vfp.2015.5.200
10.
Mantorova I.V., Djevathanova D.A. Features of Safety Values of Students with Different Type of Time Perspective // European Journal of Psychological Studies, 2016, Vol. (7), Is. 1. S. 22-28. DOI: 10.13187/ejps.2016.7.22
11.
Umarova G.M. Raspredelenie tsennostei bezopasnosti studentov vuza pri raznom tipe otnosheniya ko vremeni // Psikholog. 2015. № 6. S.32-55. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8701.2015.6.16890
12.
Kovdra A.S. Osobennosti formirovaniya vremennoi perspektivy bezopasnosti lichnosti studentov vuza // Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnykh issledovanii. 2012. № 2. S. 141-148.
13.
Lyakhov A.V., Radionova E.A. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti samootsenki studentov pri raznykh tsennostyakh bezopasnosti // Uchenye zapiski IMEI. 2016. № 2. T. 6. S. 51-66.
14.
Matveeva E.I. Vnushaemost' studentov kak faktor psikhologicheskoi bezopasnosti lichnosti // Dostizheniya vuzovskoi nauki. 2016. № 23. S. 98-102.
15.
Mesropyan G.M. Trevozhnost' v sisteme psikhologicheskoi bezopasnosti lichnosti // Psikhologiya, sotsiologiya i pedagogika. 2016. № 3 (54). S. 59-66.
16.
Lyakhov A.V., Sushkova V.V. The inclusion of subjective security priorities of students in the regulatory mechanisms of the individual resilience // European Journal of Psychological Studies. 2015. № 2 (6). S. 67-74. DOI: 10.13187/ejps.2015.6.67
17.
Karipbaev B.I. The Myth as the Overcoming // European Researcher. 2013. Vol. (46). № 4-2. Pp. 858-862.
18.
Kassirer E. Opyt o cheloveke: Vvedenie v filosofiyu chelovecheskoi kul'tury // Problema cheloveka v zapadnoi filosofii / Perevod A.N. Murav'eva / Sost. i poslesl. P.S. Gurevicha; Obshch. red. Yu.N. Popova. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo «Progress», 1988. C.3-30.
19.
Mamardashvili M.K.. Vvedenie v filosofiyu. M., 1996. Elektronnaya publikatsiya: Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologii. 21.01.2008. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/5501
20.
Malinovskii B. Magiya, nauka i religiya. Mif v primitivnoi psikhologii. Rol' mifa v zhizni. M.: Iz-vo «Refl-buk», 1998. 172 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website