—тать€ '  вопросу о правосубъектности Ђэлектронного лицаї' - журнал 'ёридические исследовани€' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

ѕубликаци€ за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
ѕри необходимости издательство предоставл€ет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. ”же через 72 часа стать€ по€вл€етс€ в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
ѕо первому требованию предоставл€ем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Concerning the Question about the Legal Personality of Electronic Person

Morkhat Petr Mechislavovich

PhD in Law

judge of the Arbitration Court for the Moscow Region

107053, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Prospekt Akademika Sakharova, 18, kab. 604

constitution88@gmail.com
ƒругие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2018.4.25647

Review date:

06-03-2018


Publish date:

23-04-2018


Abstract.

The subject of the research is the analysis of the legal personality of a new entity, electronic person. Morkhat provides current definitions of electronic person including those offered by the foreign scientists. The author of the article underlines the importance of developing the Russian law that would regulate the electronic person (artificial intellect) issue. The author analyzes the legal consolidation of The Commission of the European Parliament for Civil Regulation in the Field of Robotechnics. Indeed, we should not forget about the risks when we encourage the development of the human civilization through the means of technical regulation and try to create robots with artificial intellect that would serve the humanity. In this research Morkhat has used the method of materialist dialectic, structured system analysis, functional analysis, comparison, formal logic, comparative law, technical law and logical method. According to theauthor, growing independence of robots with artificial intellect would require to review a whole range of reference legal structures and even reference branches or institutions of law (legal responsibility regime, taxation regime, regulation of accountability and reporting, regulation of intellecltual property rights, e-commerce regime or so called trade bots, electronic person protection regime, etc.).

Keywords: legislation, President of Russian Federation, progress, information law, Information Technology, message, electronic person, legal personality, theory of law, Artificial Intelligence
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Galasso A., Hong L. Punishing Robots: Issues in the Economics of Tort Liability and Innovation in Artificial Intelligence [Nakazyvaya robotov: problemy ekonomiki grazhdansko-pravovoi otvetstvennosti i innovatsii v sfere iskusstvennogo intellekta] // . Ц 2018. Ц 10 p. Ц P. 5.
2.
Draft Report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics [Proekt Otcheta s rekomendatsiyami Komissii po grazhdansko-pravovomu regulirovaniyu v sfere robototekhniki] (2015/2103(INL)), 31.05.2016 / Committee on Legal Affairs / European Parliament; Rapporteur: Mady Delvaux // . Ц 22 p. Ц P. 5.
3.
Čerka P., Grigienė J., Sirbikytė G. Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence [Otvetstvennost' za ushcherb, vyzvannyi iskusstvennym intellektom] // Computer Law & Security Review. Ц 2015, June. Ц Vol. 31. Ц Issue 3. Ц P. 376Ц389. Ц P. 383.
4.
Robertson J. Human rights vs. robot rights: Forecasts from Japan [Prava cheloveka vs. prava robotov: prognozy iz Yaponii] // Critical Asian Studies. Ц 2014. Ц Vol. 46. Ц є 4. Ц P. 571Ц598. Ц P. 593. .
5.
Solum L.B. Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences [Pravosub''ektnost' dlya iskusstvennogo intellekta] // North Carolina Law Review. Ц 1992. Ц Vol. 70. Цє 4. Ц P. 1231Ц1287. Ц P. 1257. .
6.
Vincent J. Giving robots СpersonhoodТ is actually about making corporations accountable [Predostavlenie robotam pravosub''ektnosti na samom dele zaklyuchaetsya v tom, chtoby privlech' k otvetstvennosti korporatsii] // . Ц 19.01.2017.
7.
Vashkevich A. Yuridicheskie elektronnye litsa //. Ц 22.05.2016.
8.
Krasilova E. ЂOniї uzhe na podkhode. V Evrope mogut poyavit'sya Ђelektronnye litsaї // . Ц 26.06.2016.
9.
Makarov O. ES predlozhili nadelit' robotov statusom Ђelektronnykh litsї // . Ц 22.06.2016.
10.
Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii V.V. Putina ot 01.03.2018 Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiiskoi Federatsii // . Ц 01.03.2018.
11.
Nesterov A.V. Vozmozhny li pravootnosheniya i yuridicheskie vzaimodeistviya mezhdu lyud'mi i robotami? Ц M.: Preprint, 2016. Ц 14 s. Ц S. 7.Shershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. Ц M., 1995 (po izd. 1907 g.). Ц S. 89Ц91. Meier D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo: V 2 ch. Ch. 1. Ц M., 1997. Ц S. 126.
12.
Sokolova M. Kollizii Ђprava robotovї. Diskussii yuristov v svyazi s razrabotkoi KiberKodeksa v Rossii // . Ц 23.05.2017.
13.
Yastrebov O.A. Iskusstvennyi intellekt v pravovom prostranstve: kontseptual'nye i teoreticheskie podkhody // Pravosub''ektnost': obshcheteoreticheskii, otraslevoi i mezhdunarodno-pravovoi analiz: Sb. materialov k XII Ezhegodnym nauchnym chteniyam pamyati S.N. Bratusya. Ц M.: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve RF; Statut, 2017. Ц 434 s. Ц S. 271Ц283.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website