Статья 'Правовые нюансы раздела общего имущества супругов в судебном порядке.' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Legal peculiarities of division of property of spouses through judicial proceedings

Gromozdina Mariya Vladimirovna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor at the Department of Civil and Business Law of Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management

630004, Russia, Novosibirsk, ul. Kamenskaya, 56

gromlaws@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2017.9.24089

Review date:

07-08-2020


Publish date:

07-09-2017


Abstract.

The research subject is legal peculiarities of the process of dissolution of marriage and division of property of spouses, which are still urgent at the present time. The author analyzes the examples of judicial practice in disputes between spouses over division of property, complicated by investment contracts, credit obligations, etc. Besides, the author studies disputable situations the legal regime of division of property can’t be applied to. Problems, connected with the application of clause 4 article 39 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation about the recognition of belongings as the property of each of the spouses, very often become the subject of scientific discussions and legal proceedings. That’s why the author assesses the present situation in this sphere. The paper also considers the problem of possibility to settle the dispute out of court at the stage of enforcement proceedings and the problem of court approval of a settlement agreement. The author notes that the judicial practice still contains few examples of application of clause 2 article 39 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation about derogation from the principle of equality of shares of spouses in their common property in favour of the interests of children and (or) sound interest of one of the spouses. The author uses general scientific method of dialectic cognition and specific scientific methods: system, structural-functional, formal-legal, analysis and synthesis. The research demonstrates that judicial practice in division of property of spouses is ambiguous; courts have different approaches to using particular provisions of family, civil and procedural legislation. In the author’s opinion, it hampers the unification of legal proceedings on dissolution of marriage and division of property. Based on the results of the study, the author concludes about the necessity to amend the Family Code of the Russian Federation with compulsory pretrial procedure of settlement of disputes over division of common property of spouses. 

Keywords: division of spouses' property, mortgage, procedural legislation, marital relations, magistrate, Legal regime of property, dissolution of marriage, family legislation, common property, judicial practice
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Semeinyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 29.12.1995 N 223-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 01.01.1996, N 1, st. 16
2.
Shershenevich G.F. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Tula, 2001. S.720.
3.
Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 N 51-FZ // Rossiiskaya gazeta, N 238-239, 08.12.1994.
4.
Sinel'nikova T.Yu. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya suprugov po povodu ikh obshchei sobstvennosti // Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2010. S.7
5.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 27.07.2010 N 193-FZ «Ob al'ternativnoi protsedure uregulirovaniya sporov s uchastiem posrednika (protsedure mediatsii)» // Rossiiskaya gazeta, N 168, 30.07.2010
6.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 26.06.2008 N 13 «O primenenii norm Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii pri rassmotrenii i razreshenii del v sude pervoi instantsii» // Rossiiskaya gazeta, N 140, 02.07.2008,
7.
Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 14.11.2002 N 138-FZ // Rossiiskaya gazeta, N 220, 20.11.2002
8.
Reshenie Sovetskogo raionnogo suda g. Novosibirska po grazhdanskomu delu №2-26/2017 ot 27.04.2017 g. // Arkhiv Sovetskogo raionnogo suda g. Novosibirska
9.
Opredelenie Sovetskogo raionnogo suda g. Novosibirska po grazhdanskomu delu №2-26/2017 ot 31.07.2017 g. // Arkhiv Sovetskogo raionnogo suda g. Novosibirska
10.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 02.10.2007 N 229-FZ «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» // Rossiiskaya gazeta, N 223, 06.10.2007
11.
Moiseeva T.M. Sovmestnaya sobstvennost' suprugov i (ili) obshchee imushchestvo suprugov: analiz sovremennogo semeinogo i grazhdanskogo prava // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava, 2017, N 5. S. 131-136.
12.
Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M, 2000. S.411.
13.
Volkov A.V. Zloupotrebleniya grazhdanskimi pravami: problemy teorii i praktiki. M.: Volters Kluver, 2009. 464 s.
14.
Durnovo N.A. Zloupotreblenie pravom kak osobyi vid pravovogo povedeniya: teoretiko-pravovoi analiz: diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2007. S. 82.
15.
Porotikova O.A. Problema zloupotrebleniya sub''ektivnym grazhdanskim pravom. M.: Volters Kluver, 2007. S. 50.
16.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 05.11.1998 N 15 «O primenenii sudami zakonodatel'stva pri rassmotrenii del o rastorzhenii braka» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF, N 1, 1999
17.
Reshenie Oktyabr'skogo raionnogo suda goroda Rostova-na-Donu ot 21.04.2016 N 2-1005/2016 // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus
18.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Rostovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 16.02.2017 N 44G-10/2017 // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus
19.
Panagushin O. V. Razdel kvartiry, priobretennoi v brake (osobennosti investitsionnogo dogovora s opredeleniem dolei) // Zhilishchnoe pravo, 2011, N 6. S. 25-33.
20.
Nizamieva O. N. Soglashenie ob opredelenii dolei v obshchem imushchestve i soglashenie o razdele obshchego imushchestva suprugov: osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya // Notarius, 2005, N 4. S. 18-13.
21.
Obzor sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii N 1 (2016) (utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 13.04.2016) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus
22.
Reshenie po grazhdanskomu delu №2-1831/2014 // Arkhiv Tsentral'nogo raionnogo suda g. Novosibirska
23.
Slepakova A.V. Pravootnosheniya sobstvennosti suprugov // M., 2005. 444 s.
24.
Trush Zh.S. Osobennosti osushchestvleniya i prekrashcheniya prava sobstvennosti suprugov // Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2010. S.10.
25.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 06.07.2016 po delu N 33-26115/2016 // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website