по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Corporate agreement with third parties according to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation
Vasilchenko Daniil Dmitrievich

Postgraduate at the Civil Law Department of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration 

670013, Russia, Ulan-Ude, ul. Klyuchevskaya, 28

vasilchenkodaniil@rambler.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Article was received:

01-03-2017


Review date:

04-03-2017


Abstract.

The research subject is the key peculiarities of corporate agreement with third parties stipulated by clause 9, article 67.2 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (part one). Special attention is given to the differences between a corporate agreement between the members of a company and a corporate agreement between the members of a company and third parties. The author considers the similarities and differences between a corporate agreement and covenants. The author applies general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis) and special methods (formal legal and logical). The author reveals the main differences between a corporate agreement between the members of the company and an agreement between the members of a company and third parties. Firstly, a corporate agreement is a multilateral agreement, and a corporate agreement with third parties is a bilateral agreement between the members of a company as a unit and a third party. Secondly, a corporate agreement initiates an organizational relation, and a corporate agreement with a third party initiates a binding relation. Thirdly, the conclusion of a corporate agreement is conditioned by the common interests of the parties, and the conclusion of a corporate agreement with a third party is conditioned by the interest of the third party, i.e. the decrease of the risk of obligation breach by the members of a company which are a party to the agreement. 

Keywords: corporate law, civil law, topic, third parties, lender, covenant, shareholders' agreement, parties, quasi-corporate agreement, corporate agreement

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2017.3.22154

Publish date:

16-03-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
"Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' pervaya)" ot 30.11.1994 N 51-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF ot 05 dekabrya 1994. – N 32 – St. 3301.
2.
Dianova Ya. Korporativnyi dogovor. Perezagruzka // Korporativnyi yurist.-2015.-№ 1.-S. 26
3.
Sukhanov E.A. Sravnitel'noe korporativnoe pravo. M.: Statut, 2014. S. 229.
4.
Andreev V. K. Priroda korporativnogo soglasheniya // Pravo i biznes. – 2014. – № 02. – S. 4.
5.
Shitkina I.S. Voprosy korporativnogo prava v proekte federal'nogo zakona o vnesenii izmenenii v Grazhdanskii kodeks RF //Khozyaistvo i pravo.-2012.-№ 6.-S. 27.
6.
Nurtdinov R.G. Aktsionernye soglasheniya // Opyty tsivilisticheskogo issledovaniya: Sbornik statei / D.V. Gudkov, I.I. Zikun, A.A. Zyablikov i dr.. ruk. avt. kol. i otv. red. A.M. Shirvindt, N.B. Shcherbakov.-M.: Statut, 2016.-448 s.
7.
Aktsionernye soglasheniya kak sredstvo pravovogo regulirovaniya korporativnykh otnoshenii: Avtoref. dis. … na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk / T. V. Gribkova. – Moskva ,2011. – S.16.
8.
Zazhitskii V.I. Pravovye printsipy v zakonodatel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii// Gosudarstvo i pravo.1996. №11. S.92; Sadikov O.N. Printsipy novogo grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva SSSR // Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo. 1991.-№ 10.-S. 26.
9.
Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Postateinyi kommentarii k glavam 1–5 / A. V. Barkov, A. V. Gabov, V. G. Golubtsov i dr.; pod red. L. V. Sannikovoi. M.: Statut, 2015. S.187.
10.
Vasil'chenko D.D. «O vliyanii korporativnogo dogovora na volyu obshchestva» // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. — 2016.-№ 10.-S.19.
11.
Morozov S.A. Bank trebuet ot zaemshchika vozderzhat'sya ot soversheniya opredelennykh deistvii. Kogda takoe uslovie v dogovore pravomerno // Arbitrazhnaya praktika.-M.: ZAO «Aktion-Media», 2014, № 6.-S. 84
12.
Informatsionnoe pis'mo Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 13.09.2011 N 147 «Obzor sudebnoi praktiki razresheniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem polozhenii Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii o kreditnom dogovore» // "Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF" ot 2011.-N 11.
13.
Belyaev R. V. Kovenanty kak mekhanizm upravleniya riskami v kreditnykh otnosheniyakh" // Vestnik SPbGU Seriya Menedzhment.-2015. – N 1.-S. 94
14.
Opredelenie VAS ot 28.09.2012 po delu № A25-1260/2011 // [Elektronnyi resurs] – elektron. dan. – Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy "Konsul'tantPlyus"
15.
A. G. Karapetov.Pravovaya priroda i posledstviya narusheniya kovenantov v finansovykh sdelkakh // Chastnoe pravo i finansovyi rynok : Vypusk 1.-M.: Statut, 2011.-S. 148.
16.
Kuvaldina T.B. Kovenanty v bukhgalterskoi (finansovoi) otchetnosti // Bukhgalterskii uchet. 2015.-№4.-S. 94-97.
17.
Popkova L.A. Kovenanty v kreditnykh dogovorakh: zarubezhnyi opyt i rossiiskaya praktika// Bankovskoe pravo. – 2013.-№ 4.-S.15.
18.
Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Yuridicheskie litsa: Postateinyi kommentarii k glave 4 / E.V. Badulina, K.P. Belyaev, A.S. Vasil'ev i dr.; pod red. P.V. Krasheninnikova. M.: Statut, 2014.-S. 218.
19.
Prikaz Minfina Rossii ot 18.02.2015 N 25n "Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka vedeniya Edinogo gosudarstvennogo reestra yuridicheskikh lits i Edinogo gosudarstvennogo reestra individual'nykh predprinimatelei, ispravleniya tekhnicheskoi oshibki v zapisyakh ukazannykh gosudarstvennykh reestrov, predostavleniya soderzhashchikhsya v nikh svedenii i dokumentov organam gosudarstvennoi vlasti, inym gosudarstvennym organam, organam gosudarstvennykh vnebyudzhetnykh fondov, organam mestnogo samoupravleniya i sudam" // [Elektronnyi resurs]-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy "Konsul'tant plyus".
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website