по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

General rules of punishment assignment for joint crimes: comparative and legal aspect
Kulikov Egor Alekseevich

PhD in Law

senior lecturer, Chair of Criminal Law and Criminology, Altai State University

656010, Russia, Altaiskii krai, g. Barnaul, ul. Smirnova, 46, kv. 151

kulikoveg@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Article was received:

18-12-2016


Review date:

17-12-2016


Abstract.

The research object is punishment assignment for joint crimes formalized in the current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Thus the process of criminal legislation development, started in 1845 with the Decree on criminal and penal punishments, has been completed. The research subject is the rules of imposition of punishment for joint crimes determined by the specificity of the phenomenon and the necessity to take into account the criminal law principles and the common rules of assignment of punishment. The author applies the comparative-legal method revealing the general and the special features of regulation of punishment assignment for joint crimes in the criminal legislation of Russia and foreign countries. The author considers the common rules of punishment assignment for joint crimes in the comparative-legal context; characterizes the specificity of these rules and compares them with the similar rules of criminal legislation of some foreign countries. The author concludes about a high level of legal regulation of punishment assignment for joint crimes in the Russian criminal legislation; particularly, the author notes that the current version of the article 67 of the criminal Code provides for a more individualized punishment for accomplices. 

Keywords: crime, group of persons, criminal law, measure, responsibility, punishment, complicity, assignment, condemnation, prevention

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2017.3.21409

Publish date:

16-03-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kulikov E.A. Mera ugolovnogo nakazaniya za prestuplenie v souchastii: obshchie kriterii opredeleniya. Saarbryuken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. 2013. S. 43-50.
2.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: federal'nyi zakon ot 13 iyunya 1996 № 63-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 17 iyunya 1996. № 25. St. 2954.
3.
Pravila naznacheniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie dlya sudei / Otv. red. Yu.F. Bespalov. M.: Prospekt, 2015. S. 84-89.
4.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Respubliki Uzbekistan. Utverzhden Zakonom RU ot 22.09.94 g. N 2012-XII / [Elektronnyi resurs] – elektron. dan. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.legislationline.org/ru/documents/action/popup/id/14405/preview
5.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Azerbaidzhanskoi Respubliki. Podpisan 30.12.1999. / [Elektronnyi resurs] – Elektron. dan. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.legislationline.org/ru/documents/action/popup/id/14108/preview
6.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Respubliki Moldova. Zakon N 985-XV ot 18.04.2002. / [Elektronnyi resurs] – Elektron. dan. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.yk-md.ru
7.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Ukrainy. Zakon ot 05.04.2001 № 2341-III. / [Elektronnyi resurs] – Elektron. dan. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://meget.kiev.ua/kodeks/ugolovniy-kodeks
8.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Respubliki Tadzhikistan. Ot 21 maya 1998 goda. / [Elektronnyi resurs] – Elektron. dan. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.legislationline.org/ru/documents/action/popup/id/14346/preview
9.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 3 iyulya 2014 goda № 226-V (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 16.11.2015 g.) // Vedomosti Parlamenta Respubliki Kazakhstan, 2014 god, iyul', № 13 (2662), st. 83.
10.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Respubliki Belarus'. Ot 9 iyulya 1999 g. № 275-Z / [Elektronnyi resurs] – Elektron. dan. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.tamby.info/kodeks/yk.htm
11.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Gollandii. / Nauchn. red. B.V. Volzhenkin, per. s angl. I.V. Mironovoi. SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr «Press», 2001. S. 179.
12.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Frantsii / nauchn. red. L.V. Golovko, N.E. Krylovoi; per. s frantsuzskogo i predisl. N.E. Krylovoi. SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr «Press», 2002. S. 78-79.
13.
The Penal Code of California / [Elektronnyi resurs]. – elektron. dan. – rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=pen&codebody=&hits=20
14.
Ugolovnyi kodeks shtata Tekhas / Nauch. red. i predisl. I.D. Kozochkina. Per. s angl. D.G. Osipova, I.D. Kozochkina. SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr «Press», 2006. S. 84.
15.
Ugolovnoe ulozhenie (Ugolovnyi kodeks) Federativnoi Respubliki Germaniya: tekst i nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii / Perevod, primechaniya i kommentarii P.V. Golovenkova; vstupitel'naya stat'ya U.V. Khell'manna, A.I. Raroga, P.V. Golovenkova. M., 2010. S. 38.
16.
Nitsenko R.A. Smyagchenie i usilenie nakazaniya pri ego Naznachenii v Rossiiskom ugolovnom prave // Pravo i politika. 2013. № 12. C. 1701-1706. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.9942.
17.
Nikolaeva Yu.V. Viktimologicheskie aspekty profilaktiki prestuplenii v otnosheniinesovershennoletnikh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2011. № 7. C. 83-91.
18.
Filimonov I.A., Filimonov A.A. Teoriya i praktika naznacheniya nakazaniya v vide lisheniya prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoi deyatel'nost'yu // Pravo i politika. 2016. № 6. C. 754-760. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.6.19365.
19.
Polukarov A.V. Problemy i sovershenstvovanie praktiki naznacheniya nekotorykh vidov nakazanii za korruptsionnye prestupleniya v sotsial'noi sfere // Pravo i politika. 2016. № 10. C. 1278 - 1286. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.10.17894.
20.
Bezgin V.B. Pravovye obychai v obydennom soznanii i povsednevnoi zhizni rossiiskogo krest'yanstva vtoroi poloviny XIX – nachala XX veka // Pravo i politika. 2013. № 10. C. 1373 - 1380. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9640.
21.
Pris' I.E. „Smysl est' upotreblenie“ // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 1. C. 40 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.10509.
22.
Khachatryan A.K. Amnistiya kak vid osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti // Pravo i politika. 2014. № 10. C. 1576 - 1581. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.10.13075.
23.
Akopdzhanova M.O. O blanketnosti dispozitsii normy rossiiskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva o nalogovom prestuplenii, predusmotrennom st. 199.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. 2012. № 11. C. 46 - 51.
24.
Dubovik O.L. Osnovnye napravleniya reformy ugolovno-ekologicheskogo zakonodatel'stva Germanii // Pravo i politika. 2013. № 6. C. 836 - 842. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.8304.
25.
Ponyatovskaya T.G. Nakazaniya, naznachaemye nesovershennoletnim: sniskhozhdenie ili beznakazannost'? // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. 2013. № 1. C. 80 - 84.
26.
Astishina T.V. Vzaimosvyaz' prestuplenii protiv obshchestvennoi nravstvennosti s inymi vidami prestuplenii // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2014. № 1. C. 22-29. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.1.10778.
27.
Azhiba I.R. Evolyutsiya ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za privedenie v negodnost' transportnykh sredstv ili putei soobshcheniya // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2015. № 5. C. 343-347. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2015.5.16580.
28.
Poleshchuk O.V. Nekotorye aspekty vovlecheniya nesovershennoletnikh v prestupnuyu deyatel'nost' // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 2. C. 309 - 316.
29.
Kostenko N.I. Problemy otvetstvennosti v mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom prave // Pravo i politika. 2014. № 8. C. 1188 - 1205. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.8.11378.
30.
Dubovik O.L. Fundamental'noe issledovanie prestupleniya i nakazaniya v istorii i kul'ture Rossii (Retsenziya na knigu: Naumov A.V. Prestuplenie i nakazanie v istorii Rossii. V 2 ch. M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. Ch. I. 752 s., Ch. II. – 656 s.) // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2014. № 6. C. 651 - 658. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.6.12381.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website