Статья 'Конституционный судебный процесс как особая среда осуществления доказывания' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Constitutional judicial proceedings as a special circumstance of proving

Golovkova Antonina Yur'evna

Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Senior Lecturer at the Constitutional Law Department of Ural State Law University

620000, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Komsomol'skaya, 21

s.2610@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2016.10.2042

Review date:

08-08-2020


Publish date:

07-10-2016


Abstract.

The paper studies the influence of the specificity of constitutional judicial proceedings as a certain circumstance, used for legal matters resolving, on the process of proving, particularly, the subject of proving and the evidences. The author studies the peculiarities of the process of proving in constitutional legal proceedings and compares it with similar matters in other legal proceedings. The author notes that the understanding of proving and evidences, typical for the legal science, is limited to the approaches, established in relation to judicial proceedings aimed at resolving the matters of a fact. Using the system, comparative-legal and formal-legal analysis, the author outlines the central problem of the article. Based on the peculiarities of constitutional judicial proceedings, the author concludes that proving in this type of judicial proceedings doesn’t conform to a traditional understanding of proving in other branches of law; therefore, there is a necessity to develop a more detailed normative regulation of this very branch of procedural law, thus improving the mechanism of realization of the personal right to judicial protection by means of constitutional judicial proceedings. 

Keywords: stages of constitutional judicial proceedings, normative regulation of proving , legal arguments , fact in proof, matters of fact, matters of law, evidence, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, proving, Constitutional judicial proceedings
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii: federal'nyi zakon ot 08.03.2015 № 21-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2015) // Rossiiskaya gazeta. № 49. 11.03.2015; URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru - 30.12.2015.
2.
Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: federal'nyi zakon ot 14.11.2002 № 138-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2015) // Rossiiskaya gazeta. № 220. 20.11.2002№; Rossiiskaya gazeta. № 297. 31.12.2015.
3.
Arbitrazhnyi protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: federal'nyi zakon ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2015) // Rossiiskaya gazeta. № 137. 27.07.2002; Rossiiskaya gazeta. №297. 31.12.2015.
4.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: federal'nyi zakon ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2015) // Rossiiskaya gazeta. № 249. 22.12.2001; URL:http://www.pravo.gov.ru - 30.12.2015.
5.
Narutto S.V. Konstitutsionnyi sudebnyi protsess: uchebnik dlya magistrantov, aspirantov, prepodavatelei / S.V. Narutto, S.E. Nesmeyanova, E.S. Shugrina. M.: Norma: NITs INFRA-M, 2014. 432 s.
6.
Konstitutsionnyi sudebnyi protsess: uchebnik / Otv. red. M.S. Salikov. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M. : Norma : INFRA-M, 2014. 352 s.
7.
Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993 g.) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 №6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // Rossiiskaya gazeta. № 7. 21.01.2009.
8.
O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Federal'nyi konstitutsionnyi zakon Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 21.07.1994 g. № 1-FKZ (v red. ot 14.12.2015 g.) // Rossiiskaya gazeta. № 138 – 139. 23.07.1994; URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru - 15.12.2015.
9.
Kommentarii k Federal'nomu konstitutsionnomu zakonu «O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiiskoi Federatsii» / Pod red. G.A. Gadzhieva. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012. 672 c.
10.
Budylin S.V. Vopros prava ili vopros fakta? Dokazyvanie i kassatsiya // Vestnik Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga. M.: Zakon. 2014. № 2(30). S. 80-83.
11.
Petrov A.A. Resheniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii: konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie : monografiya. Irkutsk: Institut zakonodatel'stva i pravovoi informatsii im. M.M. Speranskogo, Fond «Pravo i Demokratiya», 2012. 516 s.
12.
Ovsepyan Zh.I. Konstitutsionnoe sudebno-protsessual'noe pravo (konstitutsionnaya yustitsiya): u istokov otrasli prava, nauki i uchebnoi distsipliny // Severo-Kavkazskii yuridicheskii vestnik. 1998. № 2. S. 35-37.
13.
Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zaprosa Gosudarstvennogo Sobraniya – El Kurultai Respubliki Altai o proverke konstitutsionnosti Zakona Respubliki Altai «O munitsipal'nykh obrazovaniyakh goroda, raiona (aimakov) Respubliki i o polnomochiyakh ikh organov na perekhodnyi period» : Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii ot 13.11.2001 № 253- O // Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. 2002. № 2.
14.
Blokhin P.D. Analogiya i «vedushchie osnovaniya resheniya» v konstitutsionnom pravosudii // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2014. № 4. S. 29-38.
15.
Blankenagel' A. Rossiiskii Konstitutsionnyi Sud: videnie sobstvennogo statusa // Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeiskoe obozrenie. 1994. № 2. S. 35.
16.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii chastei tret'ei, chetvertoi i pyatoi stat'i 377 Ugolovno - protsessual'nogo kodeksa RSFSR v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan A.B. Aulova, A.B. Dubrovskoi, A.Ya. Karpinchenko, A.I. Merkulova, R.R. Mustafina i A.A. Stubailo : Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda ot 14.02.2000 № 2-P // Rossiiskaya gazeta. № 38. 23.02.2000.
17.
Nesmeyanova S.E. Razvitie konstitutsionnoi yustitsii v stranakh Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv // Vestnik Ustavnogo Suda Sverdlovskoi oblasti. 2010. № 1. S. 166-170.
18.
Sokolov T.V. Konstitutsionnoe sudoproizvodstvo – mekhanizm realizatsii sudebnoi vlasti?! // Pravo i politika. 2014. № 3. C. 313 - 325. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.3.11168.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website