по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

ON THE POSSIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF INDEPENDENCE AND COMPETITIVENESS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
Bakradze Andrei Anatol'evich

Doctor of Law

Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure at State University of Management

109542, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Ryazanskii Prospekt, 99, of. A-403

Bakradzeaa@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Aminov David Isakovich

Doctor of Law

Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure at the State University of Management

109542, Russia, Moscow, Ryazanskiy Prospekt, 99, of. A-403

aminovdi59@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Article was received:

22-03-2015


Review date:

23-03-2015


Abstract.

The authors offer the ways of implementation of principles of independence and competitiveness in criminal proceedings as a governmental activity in the sphere of justice which saliently forms the citizens’ comprehension of the existing level of social justice. In the authors’ opinion, the observation of certain conditions in the activity of judicial and law enforcement bodies would enhance their efficiency, in particular: 1) would exempt legislative bodies from participation in bureaucratic “games”; 2) the level of accessibility of justice for citizens would significantly increase; 3) the confidence of citizens in the possibility of their rights and interests defending would strengthen; 5) citizens would more actively assist the authorities in combating crime; 5) the workload of public administration would significantly decrease due to activization of internal potential of public and business institutions in combating crimes, etc. The methodology of the research is based on the general and special methods of scientific cognition: the methods of empirical research (observation, comparison, collection and analysis of data), analysis and synthesis of theoretical and practical material. The authors analyze normative-legal acts, educational literature, special literature, statistical data and law enforcement practice. The authors offer the ways of implementation of principles of independence and competitiveness in criminal proceedings by means of formation of political will capable of improvement of the ideology of an official in relation to the role of legal proceedings in the country, effective prohibition of “telephone law”, development of the institute of advocatory investigation, public expertise of criminal cases, enhancement of professionalism of the prosecution. 

Keywords: corruption crimes, bribery, public expertise, advocatory investigation, principle of competitiveness, principle of independence, court, advocacy, prosecutor, punishment

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2015.6.14775

Publish date:

01-06-2015


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Aminov D.I., Solonin A.Yu. Ot chego zavisit effektivnost' ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeistviya?/ Aminov D.I., Solonin A.Yu. // Rossiiskii sledova-tel', 2009. № 17. S. 13-16.
2.
Aminov D.I., Solonin A.Yu. Tseli pravoprimenitel'noi deyatel'nosti / Aminov D.I., Solonin A.Yu. // Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo ag-rarnogo zaochnogo universiteta, 2008. № 5. S. 166-167.
3.
Aminov D.I., Polishchuk D.A. Sekrety effektivnosti ugolovno-pravovoi politiki / Aminov D.I., Polishchuk D.A // Rossiiskii sledovatel', 2013. № 18. S. 11-14.
4.
Aminov D.I., Polishchuk D.A. Neskol'ko slov o roli monitoringa v sovre-mennoi ugolovnoi politike / Aminov D.I., Polishchuk D.A // Rossiiskii sle-dovatel', 2013. № 12. S. 27-29.
5.
Myshko F.G., Aminov D.I. Gde skryvayutsya rezervy effektivnosti ugo-lovno-pravovoi politiki? / Myshko F.G., Aminov D.I. // Vestnik Moskov-skogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2012. № 11. S. 48-51?
6.
Bakradze A.A. Prodolzhaemoe moshennichestvo: teoriya i praktika / A.A. Bakradze // Bezopasnost' biznesa, 2014. № 2. S. 23-29.
7.
Bakradze A.A. Ob isklyuchenii ushcherba iz ponyatiya khishcheniya / A.A. Bakradze // Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya). 2013. № 8. S. 122-127.
8.
Bakradze A.A. Otgranichenie khishcheniya predmetov, imeyushchikh osobuyu tsennost' ot smezhnykh prestuplenii / A.A. Bakradze // Zakonnost' i pravoporyadok v sovremennom obshchestve, 2011. № 4. S. 231-237.
9.
Bakradze A.A. Ob''ektivnaya storona prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 164 UK RF / A.A. Bakradze // Rossiiskii sledovatel', 2009. № 24. S. 6-8.
10.
Bakradze A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ugolovno-pravovoi okhrany sob-stvennosti ot prestuplenii, sovershaemykh putem obmana ili zloupotreble-niya doveriem. Avtoref. diss. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2011. S. 13.
11.
Bakradze A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ugolovno-pravovoi okhrany sob-stvennosti ot prestuplenii, sovershaemykh putem obmana ili zloupotreble-niya doveriem: Monografiya / A.A. Bakradze.-M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2011. S. 380.
12.
V.I. Gladkikh, I.V. Vlasova, R.N. Shumov. Protivodeistvie prestupleni-yam, sopryazhennym s prinuzhdeniem k soversheniyu sdelki ili k otkazu ot ee soversheniya. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. M., 2010 – 9, 25 p.l.
13.
V.I. Gladkikh, P.V. Fedotov, R.N. Shumov. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteri-stika i preduprezhdenie prestuplenii, sovershaemykh na rynke nedvizhimo-sti. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. M., 2010 – 9,0 p.l.
14.
Goloviznina I.A. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak mera ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera, napravlennaya na bor'bu s legalizatsiei prestupnykh dokhodov // Sbornik nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh «Institutsio-nal'nye, ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie osnovy protivodeistviya legaliza-tsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem» M.: Akademiya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti MVD Rossii. 2008.-0,15 p.l.
15.
Mikulin A.I. Printsip sostyazatel'nosti v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 10. - C. 64 - 72.
16.
Glushkov A.I. Rol' prokurora v obespechenii realizatsii printsipa sostyazatel'nosti storon na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 482 - 485. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.05.14.
17.
M.S. Zhamborov Osobennosti printsipa sostyazatel'nosti v konstit utsionnom sudoproizvodstve po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i SShA // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 12 - 15. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.01.3.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website