Институционно-правовая значимость включенности криминалистической базы данных и учета в систему сотрудничества государств-членов Европейского Союза по уголовным делам

Никитина Ирина Эдуардовна

doi:10.7256/2454-0706.2016.3.14768


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Law and Politics

Reference:

Nikitina I.E. Institutional and legal significance of the involvement of forensic database and criminal records in the system of cooperation European Union member-states in criminal cases // Law and Politics. 2016. № 3. P. 361-372. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.3.14768 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14768

Институционно-правовая значимость включенности криминалистической базы данных и учета в систему сотрудничества государств-членов Европейского Союза по уголовным делам

Nikitina Irina Eduardovna

ORCID: 0000-0003-1172-3426

Doctor of Law

Professor of the Department of Criminalistics and Forensic Science, Faculty of Law, Russian University of Transport (MIIT)

109028, Russia, Moscow, ul. Khokhlovsky Lane, 13, p. 2.

irinanikitina23@rambler.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "International security systems"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2016.3.14768

Received:

20-03-2015

Published:

28-03-2016

Abstract: This work discloses institutional and legal significance of the involvement of forensic database and criminal record in the system of cooperation European Union member states in criminal cases. Analyzes the process of creating an information system automated exchange of criminal information, principles, foundation and entities, and institutional mechanism to ensure the implementation of the Treaty of Prum. Providing an interstate process of exchange criminal information, to promote the positive and minimize the negative effects of storage and transmission of personal information. Using the dialectical method, as well as the traditional importance of comparative legal methods of studying legislation to implement the fight against crime, this work presents an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of Treaty of Prum. Since the Treaty of Prum entry into force the process forward harmonization of legislation for the protection of human rights and freedoms was further developed. Conclusions of this work may be useful to law enforcement authorities in the detection and investigation of cross-border crimes.

Keywords:

System of international security, Information security, Criminal database, Cooperation, Treaty of Prum, Protection of personal data, Criminal information, Automated exchange, Unification of legislation, Criminal investigation, international security system, information security, forensic database, cooperation, The Treaty of Prum, protection of personal data, criminal records, automated exchange, harmonization of legislation, investigation of crimes

References

1. Dmitrieva G.K. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave / Pravovedenie. 1979. № 6.-S. 85-86.
2. Dmitrieva G.K. Stanovlenie printsipa nedopustimosti zloupotrebleniya pravom / Sovetskii ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 1987. M, 1988.-S. 114 – 117.
3. Ivanov I.S. Verkhovenstvo prava v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh / Mezhdunar. zhizn'. 2000. № 12.-S. 62-67.
4. Kalamkaryan R.A. Gospodstvo prava Rule of Law v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. M., 2004.-S. 256-269.
5. Kalamkaryan R.A. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave. M., 1990.
6. Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod // Sbornik dokumentov Soveta Evropy «Zashchita prav cheloveka i bor'ba s prestupnost'yu» 2-e dopolnennoe izdanie. M., 2005. – S. 49.
7. MVD Finlyandii – Ministerstvo upravleniya, regional'nogo razvitiya i vnutrennei bezopasnosti. Khel'sinki, 2000.
8. Blakemore B., Blake Ch. Can the National DNA Database be effective and comply with human rights legislation? / Police Journal, Great Britain, 2010, Vol. 85, № 3, P. 192.
9. Cheng B. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, London, 1953. P. 121-136.
10. Dicey A.V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of Constitution. London, 1960. P. 183-206.
11. Dok. Nr. 11367/12 Council of the European Union, Brussels, 20 June 2012.
12. Innocence Project (nd) [Online] http://www.innocenceproject.org/know/ (29 October 2010).
13. The Hague Program: strengthening freedom, security and Justice in the EU / Official Journal of European Communities, 2005. Vol. 48. C. 53. – P. 1–14. Some remarks on Schengen III / Statewatch Bulletin, 2005, 17 July. Dostupno na saite: http:www.statewatch.org/news/2005/jul/17Schengen-III.htm.
14. Jackson S.W. The rule of law among nations / The Rule of Law. Dallas, 1961.-P. 71-86.
15. Jacqué J.-P. Eléments pour une theorie de l’acte juridique en droit international public. Paris, 1972.-P. 171
16. Jeffreys A.J. et. al. Individual specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA, The Hague, 1985. P. 76–79.
17. Lia van der Westen. Legal Regulations Governing Forensic Scientific Methods // Harmonisation in Forensic Expertise. An inquiry into the desirability of and opportunities for international standards, Thela Thesis, The Hague, 2000.-P. 284.
18. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2007) The Forensic Use of Bio Information: Ethical Issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics: London [Online] htpp://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/The%20forensic%20use%20of%20bioinformation%20%20ethical%20issues.pdf (14 December 2010).
19. Oppenheim L. International Law / Ed. by H. Lauterpacht. London, 1958.Vol. 1 P. 345-347; 21. Oppenheim L. Op. Cit. P. 345-347.
20. Official Journal C 193/2 of 24.06.1997.
21. OL L 210, 2008 8 6.
22. Paul V. The Abuse of Rights and Bona Fides in International Law / Ӧsterreichishe Zeitschrift für ӧffentliches Recht und Vӧlkerrect. 1977. Bd. 28 N. 1/2. S. 125, 127, 128-129.
23. Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the EU, 19 June 1990 / Official Journal C 30, 10 November 1997. Dostupno na saite: www.europa.eu.
24. Renouf A. The rule of law in international affairs / Australian Foreign Affairs Record. 1975. July. P. 395-405.
25. Rousseau Ch. Droit International Public. Paris, 1970. Vol. 1-P. 382-383.
26. Schwarzenberger G. International Law. London. 1976. P. 382-383.
27. Zoller E. La bonne foi en droit international public. Paris, 1977.-P. 350.
28. G. G. Shinkaretskaya Evropeiskii soyuz i Evropeiskaya konventsiya
o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2012. - 1. - C. 54 - 64.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.