Статья 'К вопросу о двухуровневой модели организации местного самоуправления в городских округах ' - журнал 'Административное и муниципальное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

К вопросу о двухуровневой модели организации местного самоуправления в городских округах

Irkhin Igor' Valer'evich

Doctor of Law

doctoral student at the Department of State (Constitutional) Law of the Southern Federal University, associate professor of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law of the Kuban State University, associate professor of the Department for Organization and Planning of Local Development of the Kuban State University

350088, Russia, Krasnodarskii krai, g. Krasnodar, ul. Rashpilevskaya, 43, kab. 20

dissertacia@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2015.7.13860

Received:

01-12-2014


Published:

16-08-2015


Abstract: The paper analyzes the legislative changes aimed at the creation of a two-level model of local government organization in city districts. The author outlines the possible problems of solution of local problems in the process of creation of city districts with itracity division and intracity areas. The author points out the necessity of specification of the criteria for division of city districts with intracity division into intracity areas, and of regulation of the order of intracity areas interaction with each other and with a city district.  The author argues that it is unnecessary to allot the status of intracity area to any attachable settlement. The use of the inductive, analytical and comparative methods allowed formulating the position according to the possible perspectives of practical inclusion of city districts with intracity division and of intracity areas into the format of local government of the Russian Federation. On the base of the dialectical method the paper reveals the contradictions and inconsistences of legislative approaches to the creation of a systematized and structured base of executive bodies of local government on the level of city districts with intracity division and intracity areas. The novelty of the research lies in the study of issues of correlation between theoretical-legal and practical use of city districts with intracity division and intracity areas, and enumeration of facts reflecting the unity and continuity of city economy. The author formulates the conclusions about the necessity to specify the interaction between local governments of a city district with intracity division and intracity areas (vertically), and of intracity areas between each other (horizontally). 


Keywords:

transformation, city economy, head of local administration, representative body, local administration, region, intracity area, city district, settlement, federal law

References
1. Federal'nyi zakon ot 06.10.2003 N 131-FZ «Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // Parlamentskaya gazeta. 08.10.2003. N 186.
2. Zakon Sverdlovskoi oblasti ot 05.11.2014 N 93-OZ «Ob osobennostyakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v gorodskikh okrugakh s vnutrigorodskim deleniem, raspolozhennykh na territorii Sverdlovskoi oblasti, i vo vnutrigorodskikh raionakh, raspolozhennykh v granitsakh etikh gorodskikh okrugov» // Oblastnaya gazeta 06.11.2014. N 204.
3. Oblastnoi zakon ot 20.05.1997 N 30-OZ «Ob administrativno-territorial'nom ustroistve Sverdlovskoi oblasti» // Oblastnaya gazeta. 03.06.1997. N 81.
4. Zakon Chelyabinskoi oblasti ot 10.06.2014 N 703-ZO «Ob osushchestvlenii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Chelyabinskom gorodskom okruge» // Yuzhnoural'skaya panorama. 14.06.2014. N 87. (spetsvypusk N 24).
5. Postanovlenie Omskogo gorodskogo Soveta ot 10.09.2014 N 920 «Ob obrashchenii v adres rabochei gruppy po voprosam realizatsii v Omskoi oblasti Federal'nogo zakona ot 27 maya 2014 goda N 136-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v stat'yu 26.3 Federal'nogo zakona «Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti sub''ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii» i Federal'nyi zakon «Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // Tret'ya stolitsa. N 41. 19.09.2014.
6. Reshenie gorodskoi Dumy Krasnodara ot 22.05.2014 N 63 p.1 «Ob ispolnenii mestnogo byudzheta (byudzheta munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya gorod Krasnodar) za 2013 god» // Vestnik organov mestnogo samoupravleniya MO g. Krasnodar. 26.05.2014. N 7.
7. Bondar' N.S., Dzhagaryan A.A. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i (ili) mestnoe samoupravlenie: v poiske optimal'noi modeli vzaimootnoshenii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2007. N 24. S. 25.
8. Mikheeva T.N. Novelly v pravovom regulirovanii mestnogo samoupravleniya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. №
9. S. 67. 9. Pertsev A., Korchenkova A., Gorodetskaya N., Nagornykh I. Mestnoi reforme potrebuetsya prodolzhenie // Kommersant''. Chetverg 27 noyabrya 2014 № 215. S. 3.
10. Peshin N.L. Pravovoe regulirovanie mestnogo samoupravleniya: problemy teorii i praktiki // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2010. N 8. S. 52.
11. Prokuratura podala v sud na meriyu Krasnodara za narusheniya pri ustranenii posledstvii ledyanogo dozhdya. – www.yuga.ru/news/326025
12. Fadeev V.I. Mestnoe samoupravlenie v Rossii: istoricheskii opyt i sovremennaya praktika pravovogo regulirovaniya // Lex russica. 2014. N 4. S. 396-412. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
13. Vinnik N.V. Ponyatie i priznaki organizatsionnoi
samostoyatel'nosti mestnogo
samoupravleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 709 - 712. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9052.

14. Vinnik N.V. Voprosy mestnogo znacheniya
kak garantiya organizatsionnoi
samostoyatel'nosti
mestnogo samoupravleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 9. - C. 874 - 877. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.9544.

15. Sergeev D.B. Munitsipal'noe obrazovanie kak chast' sotsial'no-yuridicheskogo mekhanizma obespecheniya prav
cheloveka // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 12. - C. 5 - 16.

16. Zakondyrin A.E. Osobennosti organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya kak mekhanizma upravleniya krupnymi gorodami, imeyushchikh gosudarstvennyi status // Urbanistika. - 2014. - 1. - C. 30 - 38. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2014.1.1174. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/urb/article_1174.html
17. Stukalov A.V. Kompetentsiya organov mestnogo samoupravleniya
v oblasti zhilishchno-kommunal'nogo khozyaistva. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 12. - C. 30 - 35.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.