Abramov R.A.
Main directions of the establishment of innovation systems within the Union State until 2030
// Trends and management.
2016. № 4.
P. 400-409.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0730.2016.4.20733 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20733
Основные направления построения инновационных систем в пространстве Союзного государства до 2030 года
Abramov Ruslan Agarunovich
Doctor of Economics
Ph.D. in Economics, professor, head of department, Department of State and Municipal Management, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
115470, Russia, G.moskva, Ul..nagatinskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Nagatinskaya Nab, 34, kv. 137
Abstract: The object of this research is the innovation systems of the Union State. The subject is the establishment of structural orientation towards development of the innovation system within the integration unions. The transnational Russia-Belarus union is being examined as an example of such institution. The author analyzes the historical experience and efficiency of the modern programs of cooperation and their integrity. The organizational support of such cooperation, as well as budget and private sponsorship is being demonstrated. The goal of the work consists in formulation of the directions of technical, economic, innovation, and social cooperation between the states, which would encourage the further integration and establishment of the single economic and political space. The author reveals the institutional conditions for the reforms in education system, the concept of which lies in implementation of the three-level model of education, built in compliance with the principle of the intellectual education cluster. The methodology lies in the forecast assessment and formation of the criteria of efficiency of the existing systems regarding the share achievement of the set by the projects results. The result of this work consists in the thesis that the search and creation of the “new markets” for optimization, development, and expansion of entrepreneurship activity or establishment of the new business become the current demands of the modern economy. The scientific novelty lies in determination of the structure of innovation systems of the Union State. The author proposes the development of the state projects based on the indicated directions. The conclusion consists in the analysis of development of the innovation systems within the framework of the transnational union not only for the purposed of creation of the universal socioeconomic and political space, but also determination of the factors of limitation and potential expansion of cooperation within the innovation systems of the Union State.
Keywords:
innovation system, Union State, direction, development, structure, market, optimization, choice, value, national development
References
1. Abramov R.A. Mekhanizmy realizatsii innovatsionnogo razvitiya regionov: rossiiskii i zarubezhnyi opyt // Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovanii. 2015. № 9-2. S. 333-336.
2. Gurinovich L.V., Goncharov V.V. Aktual'nye tendentsii razvitiya integratsionnykh ob''edinenii v ramkakh mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-tekhnicheskogo sotrudnichestva // V sbornike: Prioritetnye napravleniya razvitiya nauki, tekhniki i tekhnologii mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya. 2016. S. 71-73.
3. Kovaleva E.V. Gosudarstvenno-pravovye osnovy rossiisko-belorusskoi integratsii // V sbornike: Obrazovanie v vysshei shkole: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya Materialy Mezhvuzovskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. 2016. S. 155-163.
4. Kul'shanova A.A. Osnovnye podkhody i printsipy v protsesse sozdaniya sovetskogo gosudarstva // Nauka, novye tekhnologii i innovatsii. 2016. № 3. S. 127-129.
5. Luk'yanova V.Yu., Plyugina I.V. Institutsional'nye osnovy funktsionirovaniya integratsionnykh ob''edinenii na evraziiskom prostranstve // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2016. № 1 (56). S. 78-87.
6. Spartak A.N. Napravleniya i stsenarii vzaimodeistviya Rossii i Belarusi v formate soyuznogo gosudarstva // Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2016. № 3. S. 126-157.
7. Struk A.Yu., Abramov R.A. Stimulirovanie innovatsionnogo razvitiya real'nogo sektora ekonomiki kak sostavnaya chast' promyshlennoi politiki RF // V sbornike: Aktual'nye problemy realizatsii gosudarstvennoi promyshlennoi politiki v Rossii i za rubezhom sbornik tezisov, dokladov i statei. 2015. S. 152-156.
8. Shapiulaeva A.A. Ekonomichesko-partnerskie otnosheniya stran Rossii i Belorussii // Ekonomika i sotsium. 2016. № 1 (20). S. 987-992.
9. RIAs Pursuing Advanced Forms of Integration in the Post-Soviet Area. Legal Aspects of the Regional Integration Processes in the Post-Soviet Area. Z. Kembayev. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 2009. 95-170.
10. El-Agraa, A. M. (1989). Economic Integration Amongst Centrally Planned Economies. The Theory and Measurement of International Economic Integration. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK: 113-132.
11. Lane, D. (2015). Eurasian Integration as a Response to Neoliberal Globalization. The Eurasian Project and Europe: Regional Discontinuities and Geopolitics. D. Lane and V. Samokhvalov. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK: 3-22.
12. Libman, A. and E. Vinokurov (2012). Institutional Integration: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet History. Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK: 37-53.
13. Libman, A. and E. Vinokurov (2012). The Political Economy of Post-Soviet Integration. Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK: 86-100.
14. Libman, A. and E. Vinokurov (2012). Sub-National Actors in Post-Soviet Integration. Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK: 101-107.
15. Simón, L. (2013). Geopolitics and Grand Strategy in Cold War and Post-Cold War Europe (1945–2000). Geopolitical Change, Grand Strategy and European Security: The EU-NATO Conundrum in Perspective. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK: 55-107.
16. Vymyatnina, Y. and D. Antonova (2014). Post-Soviet Integration: Fictive and Derivative. Creating a Eurasian Union: Economic Integration of the Former Soviet Republics. New York, Palgrave Macmillan US: 9-61.
17. White, S. and V. Feklyunina (2014). ‘Europe’ and the Post-Soviet Republics Since 1991. Identities and Foreign Policies in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus: The Other Europes. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK: 51-98.
18. Bilous E.K., Nesterenko I.V., Surilov M.N. Perspektivy razvitiya malogo predprinimatel'stva v Rossii // V sbornike: Aktual'nye problemy realizatsii gosudarstvennoi promyshlennoi politiki v Rossii i za rubezhom sbornik tezisov, dokladov i statei. 2015. S. 47-51.
19. Abramov R.A. Osobennosti organizatsii venchurnykh investitsii v regional'nye innovatsionye proekty // Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. 2009. № 20. S. 26-32.
20. Abramov R.A. Sozdanie innovatsionnoi ekonomiki - obespechenie natsional'nykh interesov Rossii // Biznes: Ekonomika, marketing, menedzhment. 2009. № 3. S. 2-13.
21. Abramov R.A. Formirovanie sovremennoi rossiiskoi regional'noi innovatsionnoi infrastruktury // Vestnik Rossiiskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G.V. Plekhanova. 2009. № 6. S. 39-46.
22. Kirsanova E.G. Global'noe upravlenie ili ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo: k voprosu ob innovatsionnom razvitii na sovremennom etape // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2015. № 4. C. 443 - 447. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17168.
23. Kirsanova E.G. Global'noe upravlenie ili ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo: k voprosu ob innovatsionnom razvitii na sovremennom etape // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2015. № 4. C. 443 - 447. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17168.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
