MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:
Nadykto, E. I.
Rationality as an Impediment of Succession of Values
// Psychology and Psychotechnics.
2013. № 8.
P. 789-797.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63115
Nadykto, E. I. Rationality as an Impediment of Succession of Values
Abstract:
The article describes components of rationality and their influence on the process of succession of values.
Today, when the experience of previous generations is not used in the new information progressive reality and general orientation of humankind at technology and rational thinking, succession of values is becoming an important issue.
Influence of rationality on succession of values is shown mostly through understanding of values by mind. It is explained
that, despite a common opinion that the reason and rationality are the same things, in the process of knowledge the
reason means understanding of the irrational part of the process of succession of values, i.e. the relationship between
bearer and successor, their willingness to give and to accept, the same level of values and trust towards authoritative
figures. The author also discovers the restricting influence of rational thinking on the process of succession of values
by describing the tendency towards fast results and rational agreement on their needs. It is shown that a rationalist’s
orientation at immediate result and material needs reduces the need in preservation and transfer of knowledge
between generations.
Keywords:
psychology, philosophy, succession, values, personality, society, rationality, reason, benefit, irrational.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Belyaev V.A. Kritika interkul'turnogo razuma: Analiz tsennostnoy struktury novoevropeyskogo mira. M.: KD LIBROKOM, 2012. 288 s.
2. Bukreev V.I. Raschelovechivanie cheloveka v mirovoy istorii: istoki i global'nye posledstviya. M.: FLINTA: Nauka, 2011. 408 s.
3. Gellner E. Razum i kul'tura. Istoricheskaya rol' ratsional'nosti i ratsionalizma. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2003. 252 s.
4. Gornostaeva L. G. Preemstvennost' pokoleniy kak faktor sotsiokul'turnoy dinamiki (na primere rossiyskogo sotsiuma): dis. na soisk. uch. st. ... kand. kul'turologii. M., 2007. 211 s.
5. Levin G.D. Istinnost' i ratsional'nost'. M.: Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiya, 2011. 224 s.
6. Lektorskiy V.A. Istoricheskie tipy ratsional'nosti. T. 1. M.: IF RAN, 1995. 350 s.
7. Nadykto E.I. Analiz problem preemstvennosti pokoleniy: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie kharakteristiki i komponenty struktury // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2011. № 12 (39). C. 35-46.
8. Neudakin V.A. Mekhanizm preemstvennosti tsennostey (vliyanie sovremennykh usloviy na obrazovatel'nyy protsess) // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. 2011. № 3. C. 37-49.
9. Rezhabek E.Ya. V poiskakh ratsional'nosti (stat'i raznykh let): nauchnoe izdanie. M.: Akademicheskiy prospekt, 2007. 389 s.
10. Rudykh A.V. Strakh samoaktualizatsii kak sotsiokul'turnyy faktor razlada mekhanizma preemstvennosti tsen-nostey // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2011. № 9. C. 35-48.
11. Serl' D. Ratsional'nost' v deystvii / per. s angl. A. Kolodiya, E. Rumyantsevoy. M.: Progress-traditsiya, 2004. 336 s.
12. Shvyrev V.S., Pruzhinin B.I. Ratsional'nost' kak predmet filosofskogo issledovaniya. M.: IF RAN, 1995. 225 s.
13. Yaskevich Ya.S. Metodologiya i etika v sovremennoy nauke: poisk otkrytoy ratsional'nosti. Minsk: BGEU, 2007. 186 s
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
