Статья 'Методологические практики как одно из условий антропологической революции' - журнал 'Психология и Психотехника' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Rozin, V. M. Methodological Practices as One of the Conditions of Anthropological Revolution

Abstract: The article is devoted to several topics. The author of the article analyzes the contribution of methodology into modern anthropological revolution. First of all, it is connected with technological approach and projective attitude towards thinking. The article also discusses the definition of the term ‘methodological practice’. The author shows that this term is partly Marxian and it creates an integrated approach to studying it and such approach involved a pragmatist approach, development and reformation. These provisions are illustrated and disclosed based on the history of the Moscow Methodological Club. By the example of the project of new sexuality, Foucault described both positive and negative influence of methodology on human.


Keywords:

psychology, activity, practice, methodology, development, reflection, projection, anthropology, realization, psychotechnics.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Berdyaev N.A. Novoe srednevekov'e (razmyshlenie o sud'be Rossii i Evropy) // Vestnik vysshey shkoly. 1991. № 3.
2. Gaydenko P. Proryv k transtsendentnomu. Novaya ontologiya KhKh veka. M., 1997.
3. Davydov A.P. Krizis kul'tury i kul'turnaya revolyutsiya v Rossii [Elektronnyy resurs] // www.liberal.ru.
4. Komarov S.V., Kordon S.I. Osnovy metodologii: sistemodeyatel'nostnyy podkhod. Kategorii. Perm', 2005.
5. Rozin V.M. Antichnaya kul'tura. Etyudy-issledovaniya. M., 2005.
6. Khoruzhiy S.S. Fonar' Diogena. Kriticheskaya retrospektiva evropeyskoy antropologii. M., 2010.
7. Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Znak i deyatel'nost'. M., 2005.
8. Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Iskhodnye predstavleniya i kategorial'nye sredstva teorii deyatel'nosti // Shchedrovits-kiy G.P. Izbrannye trudy. M., 1995.
9. Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Printsipy i obshchaya skhema metodologicheskoy organizatsii sistemno-strukturnykh is-sledovaniy // Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Izbrannye trudy. M., 1995.
10. Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Problemy logiki nauchnogo issledovaniya i analiz struktury nauki. M., 2004.
11. Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Sistema pedagogicheskikh issledovaniy (metodologicheskiy analiz) // Pedagogika i logika. M., 1993.
12. Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Struktura znaka: smysly, znacheniya, znaniya. 14 lektsiy 1971 goda // Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Znak i deyatel'nost'. T. 1. M., 2005.
13. Michel Foucault, une interview: sexe, pouvoir et la politique de l’identité. DE II, 358
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.