|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:
Rakhmanovskaya E.
Social Meanings of Freedom
// Psychology and Psychotechnics.
2015. № 2.
P. 122-134.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0722.2015.2.14060 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14060
Социальные смыслы свободы
Rakhmanovskaya Ekaterina
Junior researcher, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str. 1
|
rachkate@yandex.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0722.2015.2.14060
Received:
21-12-2014
Published:
31-03-2015
Abstract:
This research is devoted to internal freedom and its links with social determinants. The author compared the views of Nikolay Berdyaev and Erich Fromm and made a conclusion that the Russian philosopher was deeper in the problem by virtue of religious basis of his humanism. Berdyaev believes that freedom comes from Ungrund. It has no foundation but it is a foundation of everything. Freedom for him is the clue for any anthropological philosophizing. He denies any social determination of freedom as it appears to be personal challenge, but this challenge might be rejected nevertheless. The paradox is that freedom is much concerned with restrictions. Especially self-restrictions distinguish freedom from self-will; allow person to get free of everything useless, alien and destruction. The author considers the phenomenon of freedom and self-will in terms of good and evil, investigates relationship between freedom and responsibility. Research methods of historical and philosophical analysis, historic comparison and philosophical anthropology are used in the article. The phenomenon of freedom has taken place in the works of many philosophers and each time it presented new meanings and aspects. In this research however it appears as internal freedom which has an internal sense of personality but not social relationships as a source.
Keywords:
the moral law, responsibility, personality, existentialism, social determination, human existance, perceived need, freedom, self-restriction, self-will
References
1. Lenin V. Partiinaya organizatsiya i partiinaya literatura / Polnoe Sobranie Sochinenii, 5-e izd., t. 12
2. Pomerants G. Zapiski gadkogo utenka. M.-SPb: Tsentr Gumanitarnykh Initsiativ, 2012
3. Bibler V.S. Nravstvennost'. Kul'tura. Sovremennost'. M., 1988
4. Gurevich P. S. Filosofiya. Uchebnik dlya psikhologov. M., 2007
5. Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi. Tom II. M., 1992
6. Arendt Kh. Chto est' svoboda? // Voprosy filosofii. №4, 2014g
7. Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody. M. 2004
8. Fromm E. Zdorovoe obshchestvo. M., 2005
9. Berdyaev N. A. Smysl tvorchestva. M., 1916
10. Berdyaev N. A. O naznachenii cheloveka. Opyt paradoksal'noi etiki. Parizh, 1931
11. Berdyaev N.A. O rabstve i svobode. Parizh, 1939
12. Mei R. Novyi vzglyad na svobodu i otvetstvennost'. // http://psylib.org.ua/books/_meyro05.htm
13. Yaspers K. Filosofiya. Prosvetlenie ekzistentsii. M., 2012
14. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: INFRA-M. 2000
15. Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto: Opyt fenomenologicheskoi ontologii. // http://psylib.org.ua/books/sartr03/index.htm
16. Mandel'shtam N. Vtoraya kniga. M., 1990
17. Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994
18. Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobody. M., 1911
19. Berlin I. Dve kontseptsii svobody. // http://krotov.info/library/02_b/er/lin.htm
20. Volkogonova O. D. N.Berdyaev: Intellektual'naya biografiya. M., 2002
21. Gurevich P. S. Diagnostika chelovecheskikh strastei. Predislovie. // Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody. M., 2004
22. Tul'chinskii G. L. Filosofskaya antropologiya i ontologiya svobody. // Zhizn' cheloveka: opyt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniya.-SPb: IPBCh, 1997
23. Frankl V. Dukhovnost', svoboda i otvetstvennost'. // Chelovek v poiskakh smysla. M.: "Progress", 1990
24. Fromm E. Chelovek dlya samogo sebya. M. 2004
25. Epiktet. V chem nashe blago? M., 1904
26. Yu.V. Shchelokova Chelovek v traktovke Erikha Fromma. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2011.-8.-C. 8-17.
27. Avalyan S.A. INDIVID I OBShchESTVO: DVA RAZNYKh PODKhODA (Opyt osmysleniya kontseptsii E. Tirik'yana) // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2014.-2.-C. 67-84. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2014.2.13030.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|