Ñòàòüÿ 'The Caspian 5 and Arctic 5 – Critical Similarities' - æóðíàë 'SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of Editors > Peer-review process > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Publication Terms
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Reference:

Bajrektarevic A. The Caspian 5 and Arctic 5 – Critical Similarities

Abstract: While the world’s attention remains focused on Ukraine, Crimea is portrayed as its hotbed. No wonder as this peninsula is an absolutely pivotal portion of the Black Sea theatre for the very survival of the Black Sea fleet to both Russia and Ukraine. In the larger context, it revels the old chapters of history books full of overt and covert struggles between Atlantic–Central Europe and Russophone Europe for influence and strategic depth extension over the playground called Eastern Europe. However, there are two other vital theatres for these same protagonists, both remaining underreported and less elaborated. Author brings an interesting account on Caspian and Artic, by contrasting and comparing them. He claims that both water plateaus are of utmost geopolitical as well as of geo-economic (biota, energy, transport) importance, and that Caspian and Arctic will considerably influence passions and imperatives of any future mega geopolitical strategies – far more than Black Sea could have ever had.


Keywords:

Politics, Geopolitics, Caspian, Arctic, Sea, Europe, Asia, International relations, State, Similarities


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. A. M. Temirbulatov. Geopoliticheskie protivorechiya strategicheskogo razvitiya Kaspiiskogo regiona // Politika i Obshchestvo. — 2012. — ¹ 3. — S. 104–107.
2. A. S. Laletina. Transgranichnye gazoprovody na territorii Turkmenistana: pravovye aspekty // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. — 2011. — ¹  3.
3.  — S. 104–107. 3. V. V. Maleev. Energeticheskie interesy Rossii v Kaspiiskom regione // Natsional’naya bezopasnost’ / nota bene. — 2011. — ¹ 3. — S. 104–107.
4. A. T. Abakarov. Kaspiiskii region v global’noi strategii v usloviyakh novogo geopoliticheskogo prostranstva. // Pravo i politika. — 2007. — ¹ 11.
5. R. Mamedov. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya delimitatsiya Kaspiiskogo morya (okonchanie). // Pravo i politika. — 2001. — ¹ 5.
6. R. Mamedov. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya delimitatsiya Kaspiiskogo morya. // Pravo i politika. — 2001. — ¹ 4.
7. R. Mamedov. Sovremennyi mezhdunarodno-pravovoi status Kaspiiskogo morya: politika, diplomatiya i pravo. // Pravo i politika. — 2001. — ¹ 
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.