Статья 'Электоральная активность населения современной России в условиях гибридного политического режима' - журнал 'Социодинамика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Sociodynamics
Reference:

The electoral activity of the population of modern Russia in a hybrid political regime

Kirichek Andrei Igorevich

assistant of the Department of State and Municipal Administration at Far Eastern Federal University. 

690109, Russia, Primorskii krai, g. Vladivostok, ul. Neibuta, 63, kv. 66

andrewword@inbox.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Spiney Kirill Aleksandrovich

Bachelor’s degree, Far Eastern Federal University

690091, Russia, Primorsky Krai, o. Russkiy, campus of the Far Eastern Federal University 8.2

kirill2015vip17@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2017.5.22988

Review date:

11-05-2017


Publish date:

04-06-2017


Abstract: This work is devoted to the main theoretical and methodological aspects of the concept of electoral authoritarianism in both foreign and domestic contexts and the study of electoral behavior of citizens both in the theoretical aspect and on the example of the upcoming presidential election in 2018. The aim of this work is to study the electoral activity of the population of modern Russia. The subject of the study is the electoral activity of the population of the Russian Federation in conditions of electoral authoritarianism. The work used a number of methods of scientific research, such as: analysis, synthesis, a method of sociological analysis. The authors pay special attention to typological features of electoral authoritarianism, their own definition and signs of electoral authoritarianism are given. In the work, the connection between political technologies and instruments used in regimes of a similar type – co-optation, repression, legitimation, electoral clientelism, and the electoral behavior of citizens, is distinguished through the synthesis of foreign experience. Based on the methods of scientific research it was found that the decrease in the level of electoral activity of citizens is due to the lack of representation of all groups of the electoral process during the elections. The scientific novelty of the work consists in a comprehensive analysis of the theoretical aspects of the concept of electoral authoritarianism by the example of the electoral process in the Russian Federation, the generalization of the results in the form of some conclusions: electoral clientelism leads to the unrepresentation of large groups of voters, which increases the level of social tension and the level of protest sentiments; the policy of populism is applied to a limited number of persons, does not provide sufficient legitimation of power and should be applied to a wider range of voters. Theoretical propositions and conclusions of the work can be used to further study and search for political technologies and tools that stimulate the electoral activity of the population of modern Russia.


Keywords: political behavior, legitimation, co-optation, populism, political technologies, elections, electoral behavior, electoral authoritarianism, democracy, hybrid regime
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Gel'man, V.Ya. Iz ognya da v polymya? Dinamika postsovetskikh rezhimov v sravnitel'noi perspektive / V.Ya. Gel'man // – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. – № 2. – 2007. – S. 81-108.
2.
Gel'man, V.Ya. Rastsvet i upadok elektoral'nogo avtoritarizma v Rossii / V.Ya. Gel'man // – Politiya. – № 4(67). – 2012. – S. 6-24.
3.
Polyakov, L.V. Elektoral'nyi avtoritarizm i rossiiskii sluchai / L.V. Polyakov // – Politiya. – №2. – 2015. – S. 6-20.
4.
Fedorov, V. Ot plebistsita k vyboram: Kak i pochemu rossiyane golosovali na vyborakh 2011–2012 gg. / V. Fedorov // – Praksis. – 2013. – 380 s.
5.
Pastukhov, V.B. Predchuvstvie grazhdanskoi voiny. Ot «nomenklatury» k «kleptokrature»: vzlet i padenie «vnutrennego gosudarstva» v sovremennoi Rossii / V.B. Pastukhov // – Polis. – № 6. – 2011. – S. 143-159.
6.
Yanov, A.L. Neliberal'naya demokratiya i liberal'naya oppozitsiya. – Nezavisimaya gazeta. 2004 [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.ng.ru/ideas/2004-04-16/11_democraty.html.
7.
Shul'man, E.M. Tsarstvo politicheskoi imitatsii. – Vedomosti. 2014. №3653 [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2014/08/15/carstvo-imitacii.
8.
Churakova O., Mukhametshina E. Kreml' podnimet yavku kreativom. – Vedomosti. 2017. №4287 [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2017/03/24/682556-kreml-izuchaet.
9.
Tsentral'naya izbiratel'naya komissiya. Vybory, referendumy i inye formy voleiz''yavleniya [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.vybory.izbirkom.ru.
10.
Kommunisticheskaya partiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Vybory prezidenta: Analitika mneniya, prognozy. 6-13 marta 2017 goda [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://kprf.ru/activity/elections/163530.html.
11.
Levada-tsentr. Odobrenie organov vlasti [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.levada.ru/indikatory/odobrenie-organov-vlasti.
12.
Fond Obshchestvennoe mnenie. V. Putin: reiting, otnoshenie, otsenki raboty [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://fom.ru/Politika/10946.
13.
Vserossiiskii tsentr izucheniya obshchestvennogo mneniya. Deyatel'nost' gosudarstvennykh institutov [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://wciom.ru/news/ratings/odobrenie_deyatelnosti_gosudarstvennyx_institutov.
14.
Vserossiiskii tsentr izucheniya obshchestvennogo mneniya. Otsenka vlastei [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://wciom.ru/news/ratings/ocenka_vlastej.
15.
Vserossiiskii tsentr izucheniya obshchestvennogo mneniya. Protestnyi potentsial [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://wciom.ru/news/ratings/protestnyj_potencial.
16.
Zinecker, Heidrun. ‘Regime-Hybridity in Developing Countries: Achievements and Limitations of New Research on Transitions’. International Studies Review 11 (2). 2009. P. 302–331.
17.
Bunce, Valerie and Sharon L. Wolchik. ‘Mixed Regimes in Postcommunist Eurasia: Tipping Democratic and Tipic Authoritarian.’ Democratization in European Former Soviet Republics: Limits, Obstacles and Perspectives. 2008. P. 57-86.
18.
Nozima Akhrarkhodjaeva. Instrumentalisation of Mass Media in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag. 2017. 283 p.
19.
D. Baluev, A. Novoselov. The "gray zones" of world politics. Essays on Current Politics. 2010. P. 266-268.
20.
Schedler, A. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013. 512 p.
21.
Rosenstone, S. J a Hansen, J. M. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Longman. 2003. 368 p.
22.
Gervasoni, C. ‘A Rentier Theory of Subnational Regimes, Fiscal Federalism, Democracy, and Authoritarianism in the Argentine Provinces’, World Politics. 62(2). 2010. P. 302–400.
23.
Johannes Gerschewski. The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization. 2013. P. 13-38.
24.
O’Donnell, G. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics, Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies. 1979. 219 p.
25.
Levitsky, S. and Way, L. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War, New York: Cambridge University Press. 2010. 536 p.
26.
Barker, R. Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentations of Rulers and Subjects, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2001. P. 41-69.
27.
Saikkonen, IAL. Electoral Mobilization and Authoritarian Elections: Evidence from Post-Soviet Russia. Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press. 2017. P. 51-74.
28.
Frye, T., Reuter, O.J. and Szakonyi, D. ‘Political Machines at Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace’, World Politics, 66(2). 2014. P. 195–228.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website