Статья ' Психологические особенности научной деятельности' - журнал 'Педагогика и просвещение' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Pedagogy and education
Reference:

Психологические особенности научной деятельности

Oleinikov Yurii Vasilevich

Doctor of Philosophy

leading researcher at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

542500, Russia, Moscow Region, Pavlovsky Posad, str. Karpovskaya, 5/A ap. 7

mgcupp@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0676.2016.2.19332

Received:

30-05-2016


Published:

23-08-2016


Abstract: While scientists seem to have rather comfortable working conditions, mental anomalies have been observed in this social group. Creative activity is accompanied with solving complex psychological problems arising in the process of studying, scientific work, adoption of a certain worldview, scientific and ideological paradigms, perception of success, criticism and evalution of their scientific activity in general. According to the author of the article, determination and summarization of specific features of scientific activity and psychlogical problems faced by scientists at our age of fundamental transformation and dominating paradigm should encourage better understanding and solution of these problems. The methodological basis of the research is based on the analysis of transformations of Thomas Kuhn's scientific paradigms, direct observation of psychologicalfeatures of scientific activity demonstrated by creative teams as well as materials presented in other researches of psychologists, psychoanalysts, historians and observations made by researchers themselves. Heuristical feature of the research is defined by extreme importance and complexity of psychological problems arising in the process of scientific research considering drastic changes of the paradigm and reformation of science in Russia. Development of a new paradigm and reformation of scientific institutions are accompanied with complex psychological problems faced by all participants of the process. These problems include choosing and proving an alternative paradigm, adjusting to new authorities and administrative hierarchy in the academic community, denial and adoptin of the market model of science, compatibility of Soviet and post-Soviet generations of researchers who have different worldviews, ideological and moral attitudes. The author sees the way of oothing and overcoming the aforesaid psychological problems in recognition and being aware of obvious fundamental transformations in society, and development and adoption of a new paradigm that would adequately reflect the actual situation with the evolution of the socio-natural universum. 


Keywords:

psychology, science, character, neurosis, paradigm, activity, will, courage, creativity, intellect

References
1. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 26. Ch. 1. M.: Izd-vo Polit. lit., 1962. S. 400.
2. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 25. Ch. 1. M.: Izd-vo Polit. lit., 1961. S. 116.
3. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii. M.: AST, 2009. 310 s.
4. Frankl V. Teoriya i terapiya nevrozov. SPb.: Rech', 2001. S. 185.
5. Servan-Shreiber D. Antirak. Novyi obraz zhizni. M.: RIPOL klassik, 2013. S. 107.
6. Kun T. Posle «Struktury nauchnykh revolyutsii» / Per. s angl. A.L. Nikiforova. M.: AST, 2014. S. 21, 200.
7. Feierabend P. Kak zashchitit' obshchestvo ot nauki // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. T. III. 2005. № 1. S. 219.
8. Amen D.Dzh. Velikolepnyi mozg v lyubom vozraste / Per. s angl. Yu.V. Ryabininoi. M.: Eksmo, 2012. S. 400-404.
9. Fromm E. Dusha cheloveka. M.: Respublika, 1992. S. 349.
10. Ivin A.A. Obnazhennost' i otchuzhdenie: filosofskoe esse o prirode cheloveka. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2015. S. 243.
11. Paskal' B. Mysli. Malye sochineniya. Pis'ma / Per s frants. Yu. Ginzburg. M.: AST: Astrel', 2011. S. 73.
12. Moren E. Metod. Priroda Prirody / Per. s frants. E.N. Knyazevoi. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2005. S. 247.
13. Shterenbenrg M.I. Fizicheskaya sushchnost' zhizni i nachala teorii organizovannykh sistem // Vechnye voprosy v svete nauki, filosofii i religii. Kn. 1. M.: OOO «Novyi vek», 2009. S. 116.
14. Uilson E. Smysl sushchestvovaniya cheloveka / Per. s angl.O. Sivchenko. M.: Alpina-non-fikshn, 2015. S. 69-74.
15. Vuds A., Grant T. Buntuyushchii razum: Marksitskaya filosofiya i sovremennost' / Per. s angl. Yu.V. Zhulii. M.: «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2015. 600 s.
16. Il'enkov E.V., Korovikov V. Strasti po tezisam o predmete filosofii (1954-1955) / Avt.-sost. E. Illesh. M.: «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2016. 272 s.
17. Kerkegor S. Filosofskie krokhi / Per. s dat. D.A. Lunginoi. - M.: Ins-t filosofii, teologii i istorii. 2009. S. VII-IX.
18. Stossel S. Vek trevozhnosti. Strakhi, nadezhdy, nevrozy i poiski dushevnogo pokoya / Per. s angl. M. Desyatovoi.M.: Alpina-non-fikshn, 2016. S.303.
19. Boyarintsev V. AntiEnshtein. Glavnyi mif XX veka. M.: Yauza, 2005.320 s.
20. Tolstykh V.I. Khochu — Mogu — Dolzhen. Opyt obshchestvennoi avtobiografii lichnosti. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2015. S. 126.
21. Fromm E. Missiya Zigmunda Freida. Analiz ego lichnosti i vliyaniya / Per. s nem. A.V. Aleksandrovoi. M.: AST: Astrel', 2011. S. 14-15.
22. Oleinikov Yu.V. Stanovlenie novoi mirovozzrencheskoi paradigmy // Filosofskie nauki. 2015. № 10. S. 53-60.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.