|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Pedagogy and education
Reference:
Baksanskiy O.E., Emelin I.A.
Evolutionary Theory of Knowledge Within the Interdisciplinary Framework
// Pedagogy and education.
2016. № 2.
P. 192-201.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0676.2016.2.18735 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=18735
Эволюционная теория познания в междисциплинарном контексте
Baksanskiy Oleg Evgen'evich
Doctor of Philosophy
D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Leading Researcher at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Institute of Philosophy of RAS)
119991, Russia, Moscow, Volkhonka str., 141, bld. 5, rooom No. 405
|
obucks@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
Emelin Il'ya Anatol'evich
PhD in Philology
lecturer of the Department of High School Teaching Theory and Technology at I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
119991, Russia, Moscow, str. Trubetskaya, h. 8, bld. 2
|
|
emelinilan@gmail.com
|
|
 |
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0676.2016.2.18735
Received:
10-04-2016
Published:
23-08-2016
Abstract:
In this article the review of modern researches on the theory of knowledge is given, the new interdisciplinary endeavour which purpose is to research biological prerequisites of human knowledge and to explain features of knowledge on the basis of the modern evolutionary synthesis and Michael Polanyi's philosophy of science is considered. Application of the evolutionary approach allows to allocate a new foreshortening in the theory of knowledge. This approach is based on rationalistic attitudes and is focused on consideration of real cognitive processes, on research of real informative process by the means of modern science. Analysis of modern researches on the theory of knowledge allows to pay attention to the new methodology which can be described as the 'naturalistic' approach. This approach tries to analyze all kinds of philosophical problems from the scientific standpoint using specific scientific knowledge. For the purposes of the present research the authors believe it is necessary to analyze the new interdisciplinary endeavour aimed at studying biological prerequisites of human knowledge and to explain features of knowledge based on the modern evolutionary synthesis. As a conclusion, the authors state that the analysis of knowledge from the biological point of view shows that there is an opportunity to broaden our cognitive area. The consecutive understanding of biology as a science about interaction of living systems with environment and among themselves defines a methodological position of Lorentz which he called a hypothetical realism after Campbell.
Keywords:
philosophy of science, theory of knowledge, methodology of science, interdisciplinary approach, tacit knowledge, world picture, cognitive map, evolutionary approach, autophoesis, rationality
References
1. Campbell D.T. Evolutionary epistemology// In Schilpp, P.A. (Hrsg.): The philosophy of K.R. Popper, Open Court, La Salle, 1974. 12-23 p.
2. Lorenz K. Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte Gegenwartigen Biologic, Blatter fur deutsche Philosophie, 1941 (mehrfach nachgedruckt). 214 p.
3. Maturana H.R., Varela F.J. The Tree of Knowledge. The Biological of Roots of Human Understanding, Boston & London, 1988. 186 p.
4. Arshavskii I.A. Biologicheskie korni poznavatel'noi deyatel'nosti zhivykh sistem v svete dannykh negentropiinoi teorii ontogeneza // V kn.: Kul'tura i razvitie nauchnogo znaniya. M.: IFRAN, 1991. S. 46-78.
5. Baksanskii O.E. Kognitivnye reprezentatsii: Obydennye, sotsial'nye, nauchnye. M., 2009. 186 c.
6. Baksanskii O.E., Gnatik E.N., Kucher E.N. Estestvoznanie: Sovremennye kognitivnye kontseptsii. M., 2008. 212 c.
7. Baksanskii O.E., Gnatik E.N., Kucher E.N. Nanotekhnologii. Biomeditsina. Filosofiya obrazovaniya. V zerkale mezhdistsiplinarnogo konteksta. M., 2010. 196 c.
8. Baksanskii O.E., Kucher E.N. Kognitivnyi obraz mira: Prolegomeny k filosofii obrazovaniya. M., 2010. 204 c.
9. Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. M.: Medium, 1995. 166 c.
10. Glinskii B.A., Baksanskii O.E. Modelirovanie i kognitivnye reprezentatsii. M.: Al'teks, 2000. 188 c.
11. Kuznetsov A.S. Lichnost' i poznavatel'nye vozmozhnosti sub''ekta // Izv. Saratovskogo un-ta. Ser. Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya. 2013. T. 2. Vyp. 1(5). 116 c.
12. Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. M., 1998. 216 c.
13. Maturana U.R., Varela F.Kh. Drevo poznaniya. Biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo poznaniya. M., 1999. 186 c.
14. Motorina L.E. Vzaimosvyaz' lichnostnogo i nadlichnostnogo znaniya // Filosofskie nauki. 1982. S. 52-58.
15. Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie. M.: «Progress», 1985. 344 s.
16. Smirnova N.M. Kontseptsiya neyavnogo znaniya M. Polani i problema nauchnoi istiny // Priroda istiny v sotsial'nom poznanii. Kalinin, 1985. S. 101-109.
17. Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya. Vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki. M., 1998. 226 c.
18. Gurevich P.S. Filosofskoe bratstvo // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. № 11. C. 1593-1596. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.11.17113.
19. Korzhuev A.V., Baksanskii O.E. Pedagogicheskoe issledovanie v sovremennom nauchnom diskurse // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. 2014. № 4. C. 51-65. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2014.4.13926.
20. Baksanskii O.E. Konvergentsiya: metodologiya meganauki // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 4. C. 505-518. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.4.10390.
21. A.A. Voronin Usloviya vybora i vybor uslovii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 7. C. 932 - 941. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.7.6449.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
