Статья 'Процессуальные решения в рамках неотъемлемой и подразумеваемой компетенции ОРС ВТО' - журнал 'Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Smbatyan, A.S. Procedural decisions in the framework of inalienable and presumed competence of the international judicial bodies of the WTО.

Abstract: The constituent instruments of the international judicial bodies of the WTO provide for the judicial procedure in general, as well as to the basic rights and freedoms of the participants of the procedure. In practical work these bodies do not limit themselves to these documents, and they actively use implied and inalienable powers. The value of their decisions on procedural issues often goes beyond the technical need to resolve the dispute. The procedural decisions of the international judicial bodies are capable of and should be able to provide for greater effi ciency of justice in general.


Keywords:

international law, competence, inalienable, justice, WTO, IJB, amicus curiae, brief


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. A.S. Smbatyan. Mezhdunarodnye torgovye spory v GATT/VTO: izbrannye resheniya (1952-2005 gg.). – M.:
2. Volters Kluver, 2006. – 344 s.
3. V.M. Shumilov. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: ucheb. – M.: TK Velbi, 2007. – 488 s.
4. WTO Law and Process. Edited by Mads Andenas and Federico Ortino. British Institute of International and
5. Comparative Law. 2005.- 542 p.
6. WTO Jurisprudence and Policy: Practitioners Perspectives. Ed. by Marco C.E.J. Bronckers and Gary N. Horlick.
7. London: Cameron May. 2004. – 836 p.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.