Nelaeva G.A., Khabarova E.A.
Assessment of the work of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia: views of Russian and foreign experts
// International Law and International Organizations.
2016. № 4.
P. 457-464.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0633.2016.4.20844 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20844
Оценки деятельности Международного трибунала по бывшей Югославии: взгляды российских и зарубежных экспертов
Nelaeva Galina Aleksandrovna
PhD in Politics
Docent, the department of New History and International Relations. Tyumen State University
625003, Russia, Tyumen, Lenina Street 23, office #403
Abstract: The subject of this research is the views of the Russian and foreign community upon the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The authors analyze the problematic aspects of its activity of legal and political character. The article examines the contribution of the Tribunal into the development of international criminal law and procedure, participation of the Tribunal in post-conflict reconciliation in the Balkans, involvement of ICTY in the integration process of the countries of Western Balkans into the European Union, as well as such issues as complication of processes and remoteness of the Tribunal from the Western Balkan countries. The main method of this research lies in comparison of the Russian and foreign communities during the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The ICTY experience allows determining the key problems in the area on international criminal justice and the ways for their solution. The analysis of the views of Russian and foreign experts demonstrates that the negative sides of the international criminal processes must be considered by international community in establishment of similar institutions in future.
Keywords:
International Criminal Law, ICTY, international criminal justice, tribunals, experts opinion, United Nations, international humanitarian law, international community, post-conflict resolution, Western Balkans
References
1. Meron T. The Humanization of Humanitarian Law // American Journal of International Law, 2000. Vol. 4. Ps. 239-278.
2. Cassese, A. International Criminal Law. Second Edition. Oxford University Press. 2008.
3. Ajevski, M. International Criminal Tribunals as Law-Makers-Challenging the Basic Assumptions of International Law (2011). Central European University SJD Thesis.
4. Droege, C. The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict // Israel Law Review. 2007. Vol. 40, No. 2. Ps. 310-355.
5. Gardam, J. G., Jarvis, M.J. Women, Armed Conflict and International Law. The Hague/London/Boston: Klewer Law International, 2001.
6. Mikhailov N.G. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi tribunal po byvshei Yugoslavii kak institut mezhdunarodnoi ugolovnoi yustitsii: Avtoreferat diss.. … dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2006. 55 s.
7. Volevodz A.G., Volevodz V.A. Sovremennaya sistema mezhdunarodnoi ugolovnoi yustitsii: ponyatie i mnozhestvennost' institutsional'nykh modelei // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2008. № 3. S. 3 – 14.
8. Egorov S.A. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi tribunal po byvshei Yugoslavii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii. 2014. № 4. S. 581 – 597.
9. Mezyaev A.B. Prava obvinyaemogo v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom protsesse (voprosy teorii i praktiki): Avtoreferat diss.. … dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2013. 68 s.
10. Lyamin N.M. Primenenie Mezhdunarodnym ugolovnym sudom norm mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava i mezhdunarodnogo prava prav cheloveka // Sovremennoe pravo. 2015. № 6. S.144 – 148.
11. Belyi I.Yu. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie i sovremennyi miroporyadok // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii. 2016. № 2. S. 238 – 256.
12. Rimskii statut Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda ot 17.07.1998 // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo v dokumentakh: Ucheb. posobie: V 2 t. / Sost. R.M. Valeev, I.A. Tarkhanov, A.R. Kayumova. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Statut, 2010. T. 2. S. 256 – 352.
13. Klimova E.A. Protsessual'nye aspekty deyatel'nosti Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2009. № 4. S. 16 – 19.
14. Nelaeva G.A. Politika Evropeiskogo Soyuza v otnoshenii institutov mezhdunarodnoi ugolovnoi yustitsii v kontekste stanovleniya «global'nogo pravovogo prostranstva» // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya. 2016. Tom 15, vypusk 1: Istoriya. S. 54 – 61.
15. Shinkaretskaya G.G. Pravomernost' sozdaniya i deyatel'nosti mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh sudov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii. 2014. № 4. S. 564 – 570.
16. Grigor'ev V.N., Antonov A.N. Reshenie tribunala po byvshei Yugoslavii po delu Gotovina/Markach kak (ocherednoi) proval mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2013. № 3. S. 9 – 15.
17. Gus'kova E.Yu. Deyatel'nost' MTBYu: soderzhanie, rezul'taty, effektivnost' // Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. 2009. № 5. S. 252–253
18. Rudolph C. Constructing an Atrocities Regime: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals // International Organization. 2001. V. 55. № 3. Ps. 655–691.
19. Snyder J., Vinjamuri L. Trials and Errors. Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice // International Security. 2003. Vol. 28. № 3. Ps. 5–44.
20. Orentlicher, D. That Someone Guilty Be Punished. The Impact of the ICTY in Bosnia. OSI Justice Initiative. 2010.
21. Nelaeva G.A. Uchastie epistemicheskogo soobshchestva v reshenii problemy iznasilovanii v vooruzhennykh konfliktakh: deyatel'nost' meditsinskikh nepravitel'stvennykh organizatsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2016. - 2. - C. 232 - 244. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.2.13109.
22. Sazonova K.L. K voprosu o sootnoshenii mezhdunarodnykh prestuplenii gosudarstva, norm jus cogens i obyazatel'stv erga omnes v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 9. - C. 1175 - 1181. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.9.9410.
23. Vorob'ev V.A. Nekotorye voprosy otsenochnykh ponyatii v mezhdunarodnom gumanitarnom prave. // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 6. - C. 825 - 834. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.6.12255.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
