Статья 'Позиционирование института ответственности по праву ЕС в универсальной системе международной ответственности государств ' - журнал 'Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Позиционирование института ответственности по праву ЕС в универсальной системе международной ответственности государств

Chuval'skaya Inga Petrovna

Associate, Kikotya Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
 

117437, Russia, Moscow, Akademika Volgina Street 12

inga-chu@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0633.2016.2.16856

Received:

01-11-2015


Published:

05-07-2016


Abstract: This work demonstrates the place of the institution of responsibility by the EU law within the universal legal system of responsibility of the member-states of the global community. The author examines issues of responsibility from the perspective of the general principle of international law (Article 38 (1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice), which provides the regime of full reimbursement of damages, as well as the instrument of international law such as restitutio in integrum, which author views as a general requirement of law and justice. The author substantiates the need to transfer the general requirements of international law on the issues of responsibility of the states based on the Rule of Law to the level of supranational and national law. Naturally, such principle of international responsibility as full restitution would seem to be a general requirement of the institution of responsibility of the universal system of international responsibility by the EU law as a part of the international normative order. Through the course of the research the author was able to establish that the institution of responsibility by the law of the European Union forms an integral part of the universal system of international responsibility of states within the general parameters of the global community.


Keywords:

International court, Law enforcement activity, Legal regulation, International responsibility, International law, International responsibility of the states, Universal system , EU law, Institution of state responsibility, International normative order

References
1. Kalamkaryan R.A. Filosofiya mezhdunarodnogo prava. M., 2006.
2. Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoi otvetstvennosti. M., 2004.
3. Cour Permanente de Justice Internationale. Serie A/B. N 21.
4. Chernichenko S.V. Kontury mezhdunarodnogo prava. M., 2014.
5. Kovalev A.A. Mezhdunarodnaya zashchita prav cheloveka. M., 2013.
6. Sidorova E.V. Kompleksnoe pravovoe regulirovanie. M. 2015.
7. Avtonomov A.S. Prava cheloveka, pravozashchitnaya i pravookhranitel'naya deyatel'nost'. M.,2009.
8. Tiunov O.I., Kashirkhina A.A., Morozov A.N. Vypolnenie mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov Rossiiskoi Federatsii. M., 2011.
9. Kalamkaryan R.A. Mezhdunarodnyi sud v miroporyadke na osnove gospodstva prava. M., 2012.
10. Kalamkaryan R.A. Gospodstvo prava Rule of Law v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. M., 2004.
11. Jennings H.T. The international Courtof Justice after fifty years/ American Journal of International Law. 1995. Vol 89.N3.
12. S.Yu. Kashkin. Pravo Evropeiskogo Soyuza: Uchebnik dlya vuzov/ Pod red. S.Yu. Kashkina. – M.: Yurist'', 2004.
13. Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoi otvetstvennosti. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2004.
14. Dmitrieva G.K. Stanovlenie printsipa nedopustimosti zloupotrebleniya pravom / Sovetskii ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava.1987. M., 1988.
15. Dmitrieva G.K. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave / Pravovedenie. 1979. № 6.
16. Cheng B. General principles of law as applied by international courts and tribunals. London,1953
17. Shwarzenberger G. The Dynamics of International Law. London, 1976.
18. Oppenheim L. International Law / Ed. H. Lauterpacht. London, 1958. Vol.1.
19. S.Yu. Kashkin. Pravo Evropeiskogo Soyuza: Uchebnik dlya vuzov/ Pod red. S.Yu. Kashkina. – M.: Yurist'', 2004.
20. Harlow, C. Francovich ant the Problem of the Disobedient State. European Law Review. 1996, 2: 199–225;
21. Vertlib F. O. Otvetstvennost' gosudarstv za neispolnenie mezhdunarodnykh ekonomicheskikh obyazatel'stv. Monografiya, izd. Yulitinform, Seriya: Biblioteka mezhdunarodnogo prava: M.,2011.
22. Wolfrum, R. Reparation for Internationally Wrongful Acts. In: Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Volume four. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, 2000.
23. Bedjaoui, M., supra note 12.
24. Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts, with commentaries, supra note 6;
25. Conway, G. Breaches of EC Law and the International Responsibility of Member States. European Journal of International Law. 2002, 13(3): 679–695;
26. Biryukov M. M. Evropeiskoe pravo. Kratkii kurs. — M.: Diplomaticheskaya akademiya MID Rossii, 2003.
27. Ohlinger, T.; Potacs, M. Gemeinschaftsrecht und Staatliches Recht. Die Anwendung des Europasrechts im Innerstaatlichen Bereich. 3 aktualisierte Auflage. Wien: Lexis Nexis, 2006.
28. Arndt, H. W.; Fischer, K. Europarecht. 9 Auflage. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller Verlag, 2008.
29. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal, C 2008, No. 115-1;
30. Valančius, V., et. al. Procesas Europos Bendrijų Teisingumo teisme: preliminarus nutarimas [Procedure in the Court of Justice of the European Communities: preliminary ruling]. Vilnius: Teisinės informacijos centras, 2006,
31. Reshenie Suda ES ot 15 iyulya 1964 g. po delu № 6/64 «Flaminio Kosta [Flaminio Costa], i ENEL (ENEL'') [ENEL (Ente Nazionale Energia Elettrica)], byvshee predpriyatie Edison Vol'ta»// http://eulaw.ru/translation/1964/6;
32. Pravo evropeiskogo soyuza. Novyi etap evolyutsii: 2009–2017 gody/ Pod red. Entina L.M.-M.: Izd-vo «Aksiom», 2009.
33. Dogovor o Evropeiskom Soyuze (Maastrikht, 7 fevralya 1992 g.) (v redaktsii Lissabonskogo dogovora 2007 g.) Dogovor vstupil v silu 1 noyabrya 1993 g. Konsolidirovannyi tekst//SPS «Garant»: http://base.garant.ru/2566557/#ixzz3UqQRsDjd;
34. Lissabonskii dogovor, izmenyayushchii Dogovor o Evropeiskom Soyuze i Dogovor ob uchrezhdenii Evropeiskogo Soobshchestva (Lissabon, 13 dekabrya 2007 g.) (2007/S 306/01). Dogovor vstupil v silu 1 dekabrya 2009 g. //SPS «Garant»: http://base.garant.ru/2566561/#ixzz3UqQppHzd;
35. Dogovor o funktsionirovanii Evropeiskogo Soyuza (Rim, 25 marta 1957 g.) (v redaktsii Lissabonskogo dogovora 2007 g.) Konsolidirovannyi tekst//SPS «Garant»: http://base.garant.ru/2566558/#ixzz3UqS8cxuC;
36. Evropeiskoe publichnoe pravo: monografiya / Lando D.D., Samarin V.I.-M.: Prospekt, 2015.
37. Reshenie Suda ES ot 12 aprelya 2005g. po delu № S-265/03 «Simutenkov protiv Ministerstva obrazovaniya i kul'tury i Federatsii futbola Ispanii»// http://eulaw.ru/translation/simutenkov;
38. Vliyanie evropeiskogo prava na konstitutsionnoe pravo gosudarstv Tsentral'noi i Vostochnoi Evropy: monografiya / Gagaeva E.A., Dudko I.G.-M.: Yurlitinform, 2013
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.