Ñòàòüÿ 'Ê âîïðîñó î íåîêîí÷åííîì ïðåñòóïëåíèè â óãîëîâíîì ïðàâå Äðåâíåé Ðóñè ' - æóðíàë 'Ïðàâî è ïîëèòèêà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Ê âîïðîñó î íåîêîí÷åííîì ïðåñòóïëåíèè â óãîëîâíîì ïðàâå Äðåâíåé Ðóñè

Georgievskii Eduard Viktorovich

PhD in Law

Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law, Law Institute of the Irkutsk State University

Russia, 664082, Irkutsk, m-n. Universitetskiy, ul. Ulan-Batorskaya, d.10.

georgcrime@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2013.7.7528

Received:

18-12-1969


Published:

1-2.625-2013


Abstract: The institution of incomplete attempt of crime in the criminal law of the ancient Russian state is hardly well studied and quite topical. The surviving legal texts of that time do not include references or definitions of the stages of crime, which was natural for the legal techniques of that time. Various fragments of stages of completion of crime are provided for on case by case basis in accordance with the legal practice, and sometimes they lack clear formulae. The opinions of the scholars on the presence/absence of the legislatively provided stages of crime (mostly on attempt) in the ancient Russian criminal law are divided and both sides have their own arguments. The scholars’ supporting the position of presence of provisions on attempt of crime in the ancient Russian law insist that it should be interpreted literally and refer to the terminology. Those in opposition of this view point out that the institution of incomplete attempt of crime could not have existed in the ancient Russian law, due to the lack of development of the subjective elements of  crime. Probably the truth lies in between these two points. The ancient Russian law did not fully reflect the institution of incomplete attempt of crime, which in fact existed in legal practice. This position of the author is based upon the comparative analysis of some similar norms of legislation of other Slavic states and the Western European states of the same historical period.  


Keywords:

jurisprudence, preparation, incomplete attempt of crime, malicious intent, offence, intention, temptation, law, court, ancient Russian

References
1. Belyaev I. D. Lekcii po istorii russkogo zakonodatel'stva. Vtoroe izdanie / I. D. Belyaev. – M.: Tip. A. A. Karceva, 1888. – 584 s.

2. Berner A. F. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava: Chast' obschaya. Chasti obschaya i osobennaya: S primechaniyami, prilozheniyami i dopolneniyami po istorii russkogo prava i zakonodatel'stvu polozhitel'nomu. T. 1 / Berner A.F.; Prim.: Neklyudov N. – SPb.: Tip. N. Tiblena i komp., 1865. – 940 c.

3. Bogdanovskiy A. Razvitie ponyatiy o prestuplenii i nakazanii v russkom prave do Petra Velikogo / A. Bogdanovskiy. – M.: V tip. Katkova, 1857. – 145 s.

4. Budzinskiy S. Nachala ugolovnogo prava / S. Budzinskiy. – Varshava: Glavnyy sklad v knizhnyh magazinah Kozhanchikova v S. Peterburge, Varshave i Kazani, 1870. – XI s., 362 s.

5. Vedrov S. V. O denezhnyh penyah po Russkoy Pravde sravnitel'no s zakonami salicheskih frankov / S. V. Vedrov. – M.: V univer. tip., 1877. – X s., 143 s.

6. Vinaver M. Issledovanie pamyatnika pol'skogo obychnogo prava XIII veka, napisannogo na nemeckom yazyke // Varshavskie universitetskie izvestiya. – 1888. – ¹ 1. – S. 1 – 254.

7. Vladimirskiy-Budanov M. F. Obzor istorii russkogo prava / M. F. Vladimirskiy-Budanov. – Rostov-n/D: Izd-tvo Feniks, 1995. – 640 s.

8. Vlas'ev N. O vmenenii po nachalam teorii i drevnego russkogo prava / I. Vlas'ev. – M.: V universitet. tip., 1860. – 238 s.

9. Gal'perin S. D. Ocherki pervobytnogo prava / S. D. Gal'perin. – SPb.: Tip. P. P. Soykina, 1893. – 299 s.

10. Danilova G. M. Alamannskoe i bavarskoe obschestvo VIII i nachala IX v. / G. M. Danilova. – Petrozavodsk: Izd-vo «Kareliya», 1969. – 294 s.

11. Evangulov G. G. Yuridicheskaya priroda pokusheniya // Vestnik prava. Zhurnal yuridicheskogo obschestva Imperatorskogo S.-Peterburgskogo universiteta. – 1902. – ¹ 4 – 5 (aprel'-may). – S. 51 – 69.

12. Kovalevskiy M. M. Sovremennyy obychay i drevniy zakon. T. 2 / M. M. Kovalevskiy. – M.: Tip. V. Gatcuk, 1886. – 410 s.

13. Longinov A. V. Mirnye dogovory russkih s grekami, zaklyuchennye v X veke. Istoriko-yuridicheskoe issledovanie / A. V. Longinov. – Odessa: Ekon. tip., 1904. – 163 s.

14. Meychik D. Sistema prestupleniy i nakazaniy po Dogovoram Olega i Igorya i Pravde Yaroslava // Yurid. vestn. – 1875. – Fevral' – mart. – S. 32–80.

15. Nazarenko G. V. Neokonchennoe prestuplenie i ego vidy: Monografiya / G. V. Nazarenko, A. I. Sitnikova. – M.: Os'-89, 2003. – 160 s.

16. Nikol'skiy S. L. «Muzhi cesarstva nashego» v svete stat'i 12 russko-vizantiyskogo dogovora 944 goda // Vostochnaya Evropa v drevnosti i srednevekov'e: X Chteniya k 80-letiyu chlena-korrespondenta AN SSSR Vladimira Terent'evicha Pashuto. Moskva, 15-17 aprelya 1998 g. / Otv. red. E. A. Mel'nikova. – M.: Institut rossiyskoy istorii RAN, 1998. S. 82 – 85.

17. Pamyatniki russkogo prava: v 8 vyp. / pod red. S. V. Yushkova. – M.: Gosyurizdat, 1952. – Vyp. 1: Pamyatniki prava Kievskogo gosudarstva. X–XII vv. – 287 s.

18. Popov A. Russkaya Pravda v otnoshenii k ugolovnomu pravu / A. Popov. – M.: V universit. tip., 1841. – 121 s.

19. Pravda Russkaya. T. 2: Kommentarii: Sost. B. V. Aleksandrov, V. G. Geyman, G. E. Kochin i dr. / Pod red. B. D. Grekova. – M.-L.: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1947. – 862 s.

20. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo X—XX vekov : teksty i komment. v 9 t. / Pod obsch. red. O. I. Chistyakova. – M.: Yurid. lit., 1984. – T. 1. Zakonodatel'stvo Drevney Rusi. – 430 s.

21. Sergeevich V. I. Lekcii i issledovaniya po drevney istorii russkogo prava / V. I. Sergeevich; pod red. i s predisl. V. A. Tomsinova. – M.: Zercalo, 2004. – 488 s.

22. Sreznevskiy I. I. Materialy dlya slovarya drevnerusskogo yazyka po pis'mennym pamyatnikam. T. 1 / I. Sreznevskiy. – SPb.: Tip. Imperator. akad. nauk, 1893. – IX c., 1420 s., 49 s.

23. Stanislavskiy A. Issledovanie nachal imuschestvennyh otnosheniy v drevneyshih pamyatnikah russkogo zakonodatel'stva / A. Stanislavskiy. – Kazan': Izd. knigoprodavca Ivana Dubrovina, 1855. – 66 s.

24. Tal' P. Tret'ya Novgorodskaya skra (okolo 1325 g.). Tekst i russkiy perevod / P. Tal'. – M.: Univer. tip., 1905. – 40 s.

25. Hrestomatiya pamyatnikov feodal'nogo gosudarstva i prava stran Evropy / Pod red. akad. V. M. Koreckogo. – M.: Gos. izd-vo yurid. lit., 1961. – 950 s.

26. Hrestomatiya po istorii russkogo prava. Vyp. 1: Sost. M. Vladimirskiy-Budanov. – Kiev: V tip. imperator. un-ta Sv. Vladimira, 1876. – 228 s.

27. Evers I. F. G. Drevneyshee russkoe pravo v istoricheskom ego raskrytii / I. F. G. Evers. – SPb.: Pechatano v Tip. Shtaba Otdel'nogo Korpusa Vnutrenney Strazhi, 1835. – 422 s.


Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.