Статья 'О заключении и показаниях специалиста: продолжение дискуссии' - журнал 'Право и политика' - NotaBene.ru
по
MAIN PAGE ABOUT NOTA BENE SERVICES ACCOUNT DETAILS CONTACT US
AUTHOR AREA
 PUBLISHER SITE
Journal Menu
 
> Issues
 
> Rubrics
 
> About journal
 
> Authors
 
> About the Journal
 
> Requirements for publication
 
> Editorial board
 
> Peer-review process
 
> Policy of publication. Aims & Scope.
 
> Article retraction
 
> Ethics
 
> Online First Pre-Publication
 
> Copyright & Licensing Policy
 
> Digital archiving policy
 
> Open Access Policy
 
> Article Processing Charge
 
> Article Identification Policy
 
> Plagiarism check policy
 
> Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
 
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Danilova, L.S., Gromov, N.A., Kolesnikov, E.V. On testimony and conclusions of the specialist: discussion continued.

Abstract: The issue on status and correlation of testimony and conlusions of a specialist in a criminal case remains topical, while the specialist was introduced into the legislation more than 30 years ago. As the authors note, the functions of specialists in a criminal process are not equal to those of an expert…

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register


Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
 Copyright protected by law of the Russian Federation.
Any materials may be published only with link to the source.
All violations of law are punishable by law. © NB-Media.