|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:
Nafikova G.I.
Specific features of interrogation of witnesses and victims in court in the conditions excluding visual observation.
// Law and Politics.
2013. ¹ 7.
P. 12-12.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2013.7.4933 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=4933
Îñîáåííîñòè äîïðîñà ñâèäåòåëåé è ïîòåðïåâøèõ â ñóäå, â óñëîâèÿõ èñêëþ÷àþùèõ âèçóàëüíîå íàáëþäåíèå
Nafikova Gulnara Idarovna
PhD in Law
teacher of department biomedical ethics, medical right and medicine stories, Candidate of Law Sciences Kazan state medical university, Associate professor of customs affairs of the Kazan cooperative institute (branch) of the Russian university of cooperation
420000, Russia, g. Kazan', ul. Vosstaniya, 129, kv. 366
|
ruslanaq@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2013.7.4933
Received:
18-12-1969
Published:
1-2.625-2013
Abstract:
The general guarantees of criminal process provide for the complex of conditions, facilitating the comprehensive and objective procedure on criminal cases. The further development of the guarantees may be found in the measures regarding support of rights and freedoms of person and citizen in the criminal judicial procedure. The problem of implementation of the principle of protection of rights of persons and citizens is related to the guarantees of subjective rights and lawful interests of an individual. One of the key guarantees for the witness and victim on criminal case is a guarantee of security throughout the process on criminal case, including the judicial stages. This security guarantee should include protection and psychological support. Keywords: , , , , , , observation, choleric, melancholic, sanguine, phlegmatic.
Keywords:
jurisprudence, witness, victim, interrogation, security, observation, choleric, melancholic, sanguine, phlegmatic
References
1. Halikov A.Obespechenie bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v stadii sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2008. – ¹ 4. – S. 17.
2. Stecovskiy Yu.I. Sudebnaya vlast'. – M.: Delo, 2000. – S. 149.
3. Brusnicyn L.V. Poterpevshie i svideteli pod psevdonimom: nacional'noe zakonodatel'stvo i precedenty Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2002. – ¹ 2. – S. 125–127.
4. Belyaev M.V. Rassledovanie i sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo del o banditizme: ugolovno-processual'nye i kriminalisticheskie voprosy. – Kazan': Kazan. gos. un-t, 2009. – S. 140;
5. Sidorova N.V. Pokazaniya svidetelya v rossiyskom ugolovnom processe: Ucheb. posobie. – Tyumen': Izd-vo Tyumen. gos. un-ta, 2007. – S. 91.
6. Ugolovnoe delo ¹ 2-5/2006 // Arhiv Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Tatarstan za 2006 g.
7. Belyaev M.V. Ukaz. soch. – S. 140–141.
8. Novikova M.V. Institut bezopasnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve i puti ego sovershenstvovaniya // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2007. – ¹ 7. – S. 38–41.
9. Yakimov I.N., Miheev P.P. Dopros. – M., 1930 g. – S. 29
10. Zorin G.A. Rukovodstvo po taktike doprosa. – M., 2001. – S. 235
11. Koni A.F. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. – M., 1965. – S. 160.
12. Vasil'ev V.L. Yuridicheskaya psihologiya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. – SPb.: Piter, 2009. – S. 557.
13. Ugolovnoe delo ¹ 119344 // Arhiv Prokuratury Respubliki Tatarstan za 1999 g.
14. Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M., 1991. – S. 24–25.
15. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 8 iyulya 2004 g. ¹ 32-O04-37sp // BVS RF. – 2005. – ¹ 8. – S. 21–22.
16. Kassacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 iyunya 2006 g. ¹ 43-O06-9 // Pravovaya sistema «Garant».
17. Brusnicyn L. Psevdonimy v ugolovnom processe // Zakonnost'. – 2005. – ¹ 1.
18. Epihin A. Pravovoe regulirovanie mer bezopasnosti uchastnikov processa // Zakonnost'. – 2003. – ¹ 5. – S. 47.
19. Malov A.A., Timoshenko A.A. Sostoyanie zakonnosti i problemnye aspekty primeneniya mer gosudarstvennoy zaschity k poterpevshim, svidetelyam i inym uchastnikam ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M.: Gen. prokuratura RF, 2008. – S. 17.
20. Spravka Upravleniya po obespecheniyu uchastiya prokurorov v rassmotrenii ugolovnyh del sudami General'noy prokuratury RF o primenenii norm UPK RF, obespechivayuschih bezopasnost' uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva ot 24 dekabrya 2003 g. ish. ¹ 12/12-03 // Arhiv NII problem ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka pri General'noy prokurature RF.
21. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 marta 2005 g. ¹ 24-D04-9 // BVS RF. – 2006. – ¹ 6. – S. 29.
22. Kassacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 iyunya 2006 g. ¹ 43-O06-9 // Pravovaya sistema «Garant».
23. Opredelenie SK po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 marta 2005 g. ¹ 24-D04-9 «Kazhdyy obvinyaemyy v sovershenii ugolovnogo prestupleniya soglasno p. 16 ch. 4 st. 47, st. 247, ch. 3 st. 278 UPK RF vprave doprashivat' pokazyvayuschih protiv nego svideteley» (izvlechenie) // Byulleten' Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii. – 2006. – ¹ 6.
24. Brusnicyn L.V. Kommentariy zakonodatel'stva ob obespechenii bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M.: Yusticinform, 2009. – S. 178.
25. Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. - M., 1991. - S. 24 - 25.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
