Статья 'Внешнеполитические подходы США и ЕС к странам постсоветского пространства в контексте международного права' - журнал 'Право и политика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Внешнеполитические подходы США и ЕС к странам постсоветского пространства в контексте международного права

Kalinin Emil' Aleksandrovich



emil_kalinin@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2011.7.3997

Received:

17-06-2011


Published:

1-7-2011


References


1. A Secure Europe in a Better World. European Security Strategy. Adopted at the European Council meeting in Brussels, December 12, 2003. P. 1, 7. (http://ue.eu.int/solana/docs/031208ESSIIEN.pdf).



2. Bacevich A.J. New Rome, New Jerusalem // The Imperial Tense. Prospects and problems of American Empire. Chicago. 2003. R. 94.



3. Darnton J. Union, but Not Unanimity, as Europe’s East Joins West // The New York Times. March 11. 2004.



4. Dobbins J. Friends again? // Friends again? EU-US relations after the crisis / Ed. by M. Zaborowski. Paris. 2006. P. 26-27.



5. http://www.nato.int/docu/update/2003/03-march/e0317a.htm.



6. Indstrom G. EU-US burdensharing: who does what? // Chaillot Papers. 2005. № 82.



7. Kagan R. America’s Crisis of Legitimacy // Foreign Affairs. March/April 2004. P. 69.



8. Kagan R. Power and Weakness // Policy Review. June/July 2002. № 113.



9. Lindley-French J. The ties that bind // NATO Review. Autumn 2003. http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2003/issue3/english/art2_pr.html.



10. Marks S. Empire's law // Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 2003. Vol. 10. № 5. P. 462.



11. Mattei U. A theory of imperial law: a study on U.S. hegemony and the Latin resistance // Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 2003. Vol. 10. № 5. P. 383.



12. Patten Ch. The European Union and the World // Europe in the New Century, Visions of an Emerging Superpower / Ed. by R. Guttman. London. 2001. P. 79.



13. Rice C. Promoting the national interest // Foreign Affairs, 2000, v. 79, № 1, January/February, p.48-50.



14. The National security strategy of the United States of America. The White House. Washington. September. 2002. P. 1;



15. The National security strategy of the United States of America. The White House. Washington. March. 2006. P. 1-2.



16. Bzhezinskiy Z. Velikaya shahmatnaya doska. Gospodstvo Ameriki i ego geostrategicheskie imperativy. M. Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 1998. S. 178.



17. Bzhezinskiy Z. Velikaya shahmatnaya doska. Gospodstvo Ameriki i ego geostrategicheskie imperativy. M. 1999. S. 40.



18. Butorina O.V. Mezhdunarodnye valyuty: integraciya i konkurenciya. M. Delovaya literatura. 2003. S. 227-228.



19. Deklaraciya OON ot 18 noyabrya 1987 g. «Ob usilenii effektivnosti principa otkaza ot ugrozy siloy ili ee primeneniya v mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniyah». Deystvuyuschee mezhdunarodnoe pravo. T. 2. M. 1997. S. 202-206; T. 1. M. 1996. S. 99-102. S. 103-110.



20. Deklaraciya o sovershenstvovanii sotrudnichestva mezhdu Organizaciey Ob'edinennyh Naciy i regional'nymi soglasheniyami ili organami v oblasti podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo mira i bezopasnosti (Prinyata 9 dekabrya 1994 g. Rezolyuciey 49/57 na 49-oy sessii General'noy Assamblei OON). Deystvuyuschee mezhdunarodnoe pravo. T. 2. M. Moskovskiy nezavisimyy institut mezhdunarodnogo prava. 1997. S. 211-214.



21. ES i SShA dogovarivayutsya ob importe «gormonal'noy» govyadiny http://www.wto.ru/ru/press.asp?msg_id=24556.



22. Kara-Murza S.G. Eksport revolyucii. Yuschenko, Saakashvili... M. Algoritm. 2005. S. 254, 260, 372.



23. Kissindzher G. Nuzhna li Amerike vneshnyaya politika. K diplomatii XXI veka. M. 2002. S. 71, 74, 326.



24. Lukashuk I.I. Otvetstvennost' odnogo sub'ekta mezhdunarodnogo prava v svyazi s deyaniem drugogo // International Lawyer - Yurist-mezhdunarodnik. 2003. № 1. S. 9-14;



25. Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2002. № 2. S. 30-43.



26. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: Uchebnik // Otv. red. Yu.M. Kolosov, E.S. Krivchikova. M. Mezhdunar. otnosheniya. 2000. S. 14.



27. Nosov M.G. Global'nye aspekty transatlanticheskih otnosheniy // Sovremennaya Evropa. 2006, № 2. S. 39.



28. Rar A. Oranzhevaya revolyuciya // Oranzhevaya revolyuciya. Ukrainskaya versiya: Sb. // Sost. M. Pogrebinskiy. M. Evropa. 2005. S. 165.



29. Rezolyuciya 36/103 XXXVI sessii GA OON // Deystvuyuschee mezhdunarodnoe pravo. T. 1. M. 1996. S. 99-102.



30. Samatov O.Zh. O voennyh bazah SShA na territoriyah SNG i sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2005. № 2.



31. Chernyak E.B. Vekovye konflikty. M. Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 1988. S. 366-367.



32. Shironin V. KGB-CRU. Sekretnye pruzhiny perestroyki. M. 1997. S. 92-93.


Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.