Abstract: The subject of this article is the points of juxtaposition between the legal responsibility (for legal infraction, negative) and ordinary (public) legal consciousness. The object of this research is the social legal phenomenon of “legal responsibility” and ordinary legal consciousness. The aforementioned phenomena are examined from the perspective of their correlation and interaction. The authors also analyze the essence and composition of the legal responsibility; each of these parts is subjected to examination regarding its interconnection with the ordinary legal consciousness or substantiation by the ordinary legal consciousness. In particular, it implies the notion of responsibility; bases of responsibility as the social legal phenomenon; special internal characteristics of responsibility, such as principles, functions, goals, types, and measure. The scientific novelty consists in comparison of the phenomena of the ordinary legal consciousness and legal responsibility. Despite the fact that at first glance the practically do not have any points of intersection, the authors determine several aspects, which demonstrate that the indicated phenomena actively interact and substantiate each other. The distinctness of the ordinary legal consciousness of one or another society defines the character, content and limits of legal responsibility; otherwise, this mechanism of legal regulation will be incompetent. The ordinary legal consciousness contains the social and philosophical grounds of responsibility; the correspondence to the ordinary legal consciousness justifies the efficiency of legal responsibility in application of its functions, as well as achievement of the goals. The measure of responsibility must correlate with the ordinary legal consciousness of society; in other case, the effect of responsibility can turn out to be directly opposite to that planned by the government authority.
Keywords:
Legal relation, Legal nihilism , Efficiency of law, Legal education, Measure of responsibility, Grounds of responsibility, Legal infraction , Responsibility, Ordinary legal consciousness, Legal consciousness
References
1. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik dlya vuzov / Otv. red. V.D. Perevalov. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma, 2005. S. 210-211, 206.
2. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: kurs lektsii / Pod red. N.I. Matuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2013. S. 220, 213-214.
3. Ozhegov S.I. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka: ok. 100 000 slov, terminov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazhenii / Pod red. prof. L.I. Skvortsova. 27-e izd., ispr. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo Oniks»: OOO «Izdatel'stvo «Mir i obrazovanie». 2010. S. 663-664.
4. Polyakov A.V. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Kurs lektsii. SPb., 2001. S. 263.
5. Voplenko N.N. Pravosoznanie i pravovaya kul'tura: uch. posobie. Volgograd, 2000. S. 13.
6. Shchedrin O.G. Etnicheskie osobennosti russkogo pravosoznaniya: diss… kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01 / O.G. Shchedrin. Rostov-n/D, 2004. S. 13-14.
7. Pravosoznanie rossiiskogo obshchestva: tipologicheskaya kharakteristika: kollektivnaya monografiya / Pod red. V.V. Sorokina i A.A. Vasil'eva. Barnaul, 2013. S. 18.
8. Demchenko T.I. Pravovoe soznanie v drevnerusskoi i rossiiskoi gosudarstvenno-pravovoi zhizni: monografiya. M., 2013. S. 85.
9. Malakhov V.P. Filosofiya prava. Idei i predpolozheniya: uch. posobie. M., 2012. S. 148.
10. Sorokin V.V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava perekhodnogo perioda: uchebnik. Barnaul: OOO «Altaiskii poligraficheskii kombinat», 2007. S. 364-365.
11. Dostoevskii F.M. Dnevnik pisatelya: Kniga ocherkov. M.: Eksmo, 2007. S. 186-218.
12. Kulikov E.A. Printsip pravovoi ekonomii kak odno iz vedushchikh proyavlenii kategorii «mera» v pravovoi sisteme obshchestva // Pravovaya sistema obshchestva: preemstvennost' i modernizatsiya: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Barnaul, 4-5 oktyabrya 2012 g. Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2013. S. 24-27.
13. Mal'tsev V.V. Printsipy ugolovnogo prava i ikh realizatsiya v pravoprimenitel'noi deyatel'nosti. SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr «Press», 2004. S. 73, 76-77.
14. Kontseptsiya pravovogo vospitaniya Rossiiskogo obshchestva: kollektivnaya monografiya / Pod red. V.V. Sorokina i A.A. Vasil'eva. Barnaul: AZBUKA, 2014. 272 s.
15. Lipinskii D.A., Stankin A.N. O roli reshenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda v formirovanii sistemy konstitutsionnoi otvetstvennosti // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. № 10. C. 50-62. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2016.10.19460. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_19460.html
16. Abdulgalimov R.Z., Suntsov A.P. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' obshchestvennykh ob''edinenii kak sub''ekta upravleniya delami gosudarstva. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 8. C. 807 - 813. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.12358.
17. Astanin G.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh po zakonodatel'stvu RF i Ukrainy: sravnitel'nyi analiz // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2013. № 7. C. 753 - 757. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9038.
18. Mindagulov A.Kh. O proekte novoi redaktsii Ugolovnogo kodeksa Respubliki Kazakhstan // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. 2013. № 1. C. 70-76.
19. Frolov V.A. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii realizatsii zapretov i ogranichenii pri vvoze ili vyvoze cherez tamozhennuyu granitsu Tamozhennogo Soyuza // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 11. C. 1154-1159. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.11.12500.
20. Razgil'dieva M.B. Teoreticheskie problemy byudzhetno-pravovoi otvetstvennosti // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2013. № 2. C. 102-118. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2013.2.9876.
21. Kashkina E.V. Administrativnyi nadzor organov vnutrennikh del za litsami, osvobozhdennymi iz mest lisheniya svobody // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2011. № 5. C. 25-29.
22. Molchanov A.A. K voprosu o neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnoi otvetstvennosti v tamozhennoi sfere // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2011. № 3. C. 67-70.
23. Lipinskii D.A., Musatkina A.A. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' pravonarusheniya v nauchnykh i zakonodatel'nykh opredeleniyakh Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Voprosy bezopasnosti. 2015. № 3. C. 24-44. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2015.3.15941. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_15941.html
24. Ostroushko A.V., Bukalerov A.A. O neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya normativnoi bazy sfery informatsionnoi bezopasnosti detei // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2016. № 2. C. 218-226. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2016.2.18077.
25. Dresvyannikova E.A. Ob effektivnosti realizatsii administrativnogo zakonodatel'stva v oblasti obespecheniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya. // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 8. C. 48-75. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.8.15591. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_15591.html
26. Lipinskii D.A. Social Bases of Positive Responsibility // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2015. № 3. C. 41-69. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2015.3.16009. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psen/article_16009.html
27. Lipinskii D.A. Funktsii administrativnoi otvetstvennosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2015. № 3. C. 63-93. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2015.3.15975. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_15975.html
28. Kretov V.V., Sevryugin V.E. O neobkhodimosti ustanovleniya administrativnoi otvetstvennosti za pravonarusheniya v oblasti dorozhnogo khozyaistva Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2015. № 4. C. 380 - 387. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.4.14614.
29. Baiteryakov R.E. O vozmozhnosti vvedeniya ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits (na primere krupneishikh nalogoplatel'shchikov) // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2015. № 2. C. 231-234. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15778.
30. Gulyaikhin V.N. Pravovaya kul'tura kak ob''ekt nauchnogo issledovaniya: metodologicheskie podkhody, struktura i kriterii otsenki // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 4. C. 135-158. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2013.4.635. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_635.html
31. Bashkirova N.N. Eticheskie osnovy vozniknoveniya nalogovykh riskov gosudarstva // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. 2013. № 9. C. 705-713. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.9.9672.
32. Ramazanov R.U. Zaprety i ogranicheniya dlya gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh i munitsipal'nykh sluzhashchikh kak effektivnyi sposob protivodeistviya korruptsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2012. № 1. C. 38-43.
33. Sizov I.Yu. Problemy informatsionnogo obespecheniya deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del pri protivodeistvii migratsionnoi prestupnosti // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2012. № 1. C. 26-30.
34. Nobel' A.R. Material'no-pravovoe i protsessual'noe znachenie kharakteristik sobytiya administrativnogo pravonarusheniya kak odnogo iz obstoyatel'stv, vkhodyashchikh v predmet dokazyvaniya po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (na primere del v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchei sredy) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 1. C. 25-29. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.1.9884.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
