Ñòàòüÿ 'Êîëëèçèîííàÿ çàùèòà ïðàâ ïîòðåáèòåëåé â Åâðîïåéñêîì ñîþçå è Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè' - æóðíàë 'Ïðàâî è ïîëèòèêà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Êîëëèçèîííàÿ çàùèòà ïðàâ ïîòðåáèòåëåé â Åâðîïåéñêîì ñîþçå è Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè

Reznik Roman

Post-graduate student, the department of International Public and Private Law, National Research University "Higher School of Economics"

101000, Russia, Moscow, Myasnitskaya Street 20

roman.reznik.180@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2015.12.17307

Received:

16-12-2015


Published:

24-01-2016


Abstract: This article examines the models of choice of law regulation of contracts involving consumers, while separately studying the model chosen by Russian and European legislators. The work explains the notions of passive and active consumers, and reflects the specificity of contract regulation with participation of both of these types of consumers. Based on the analysis of the norms and doctrines, the author determines a number of practical and theoretical problems, thus raising the issue of possibility of the cumulative application of protective imperative norms of several legal orders. It is yet unclear who initiates the application of imperative norms of the country of residence of the consumer – the consumer or the ex officio court. In addition to that, the author raises the question of exactly which imperative norms are subject to application – only those that directly pertain to consumer protection, or any imperative norms of the consumer’s country of residence. Another practical issue is the need for the professional side to consider and know the legislation on consumer protection of all countries in which they conduct business, which carries additional expenses for small and medium business, forcing it out of the international retail market.


References
1. Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' tret'ya) ot 26.11.2001 ¹ 146-FZ // SZ RF. 03.12.2001. ¹ 49. St. 4552.
2. Convention 80/934/ECC on the law applicable to contractual obligations opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980 // OJ L 266 of 9.10.1980.
3. Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) // OJ L 177, 4.7.2008. R. 6–16.
4. Federal'nyi zakon ot 30.09.2013 ¹ 260-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v chast' tret'yu Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // SZ RF. 07.10.2013. ¹ 40 (chast' III). St. 5030.
5. Rühl G. Consumer protection in choice of law // Cornell International Law Journal. — Vol. 44. — 2011. — P. 587 — 592.
6. Hill J. Cross-Border Consumer Contracts. — Oxford, 2008. — 466 p.
7. Asoskov A. V. Osnovy kollizionnogo prava. — M.: Infotropik Media, 2012. — 352 c.
8. Hartley T. Mandatory Rules in International Contracts: the Common Law Approach // Recueil des Cours / Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. — Vol. 266. — 1997. — P. 337 — 431.
9. Novoselova A. A., Lomakina E. V. Predely svobody dogovora v mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh otnosheniyakh // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. — 2014. — ¹ 1. — S. 9 — 13.
10. Bundesgesetz über das Internationale Privatrecht (IPRG) vom 18. Dezember 1987 (Stand am 1. Juli 2014) // AS 1988 1776.
11. LA. REV. STAT. ANN. § 51:1418 (S) (2014).
12. OR. REV. STAT. § 15.320 (2013).
13. Vischer F. The Principle of the Typical Performance in International Contracts and the Draft Convention // Harmonization of Private International Law by the E.E.C. / Ed. K.Lipstein. — London, 1978. — P. 25 — 30.
14. Stoll H. Internationalprivatrechtliche Probleme bei Verwendung Allgemeiner: ein Diskussionsbeitrag // Festschrift Beitzke zum 70. Geburtstag / Hrsg. O. Sandrock. — Berlin, 1979. — P. 759 — 785.
15. Asoskov A. V. Kollizionnoe regulirovanie dogovornykh obyazatel'stv. — M.: Infotropik Media, 2012. — 640 s.
16. Get'man-Pavlova I. V., Erpyleva N. Yu. Rossiiskoe zakonodatel'stvo po mezhdunarodnomu chastnomu pravu: problemy sovershenstvovaniya // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. — 2009. — ¹ 1. — S. 8 — 14.
17. Kommentarii k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii, chasti tret'ei (postateinyi) (pod red. T. E. Abovoi, M. M. Boguslavskogo, A. G. Svetlanova). — M.: Yurait-Izdat, 2004. — 486 s.
18. Klevchenkova M. N. Kodifikatsiya dogovornogo prava v Evropeiskom soyuze // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. — 2012. — ¹ 7. — S. 53 — 58.
19. Philip A. Mandatory Rules, Public Law (Political Rules) and Choice of Law in the E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations // Contract Conflicts. The E.E.C. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: a Comparative Study / Ed. P. North. — Amsterdam, 1982. — P. 78 — 103.
20. Dicey, Morris and Collins on the Conflict of Laws. — London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008. — 1950 p.
21. Nishitani Y. Party Autonomy and its Restrictions by Mandatory Rules in Japanese Private International Law: Contractual Conflicts Rules // Japanese and European Private International Law in Comparative Perspective / Ed. J. Basedow, H. Baum, Y. Nishitani. — Mohr Siebeck, 2008. — P. 77 — 103.
22. Act on the General Rules of Application of Laws. Act No. 78 of June 21, 2006 // Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal. — Vol. 8. — 2006. — P. 138 — 160.
23. Basedow J. Consumer Contracts and Insurance Contracts in a Future Rome-I Regulation // Enforcement of International Contracts in the European Union. Convergence and Divergence between Brussels I and Rome I / Eds. J. Meeusen, M. Pertegas, G. Straetmans. — Intersentia nv, 2004. — P. 269 — 295.
24. Get'man-Pavlova I. V., Erpyleva N. Yu. Kodifikatsiya mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava v Respublike Gruziya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii. — 2012. — ¹ 2. — S. 44 — 75.
25. Nekrasov A. I. Osnovy pravovogo regulirovaniya politikiEvropeiskogo Soyuza v oblasti finansovykh uslug // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2013. - 2. - C. 210 - 209. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.6341.
26. Batalova M. R. Zashchitnye ogovorki v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave Turetskoi Respubliki // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2014. - 4. - C. 537 - 544. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.4.13480.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.