Статья 'Извинения при диффамации: сфера Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации или морального кодекса ответчика?' - журнал 'Право и политика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Извинения при диффамации: сфера Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации или морального кодекса ответчика?

Parygina Natal'ya Nikolaevna

Post-graduate student, Educator, the department of Civil Law, Omsk F. M. Dostoevskiy State University

644065, Russia, Omsk, 50 Let Profsoyuzov Street 100/1

np-line@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2015.11.16612

Received:

10-10-2015


Published:

1-3.77142857143-2015


Abstract: The object of this research is the social relations forming in the area of protection of citizens’ rights to honor and dignity, as well as the rights of citizens and legal entities to business reputation. With a wide arsenal of various means of legal defense of business reputation from defamation, the civil lawyers are often faced with the question of reasonableness and legality of apology as a means of protection of the business reputation. The subject of this research is the issue of legality and reasonableness of the use of apologies as an independent means of protecting civil right. The article also addresses the issues of qualifications of issuing an apology as a retraction of previously made statements or expressed beliefs due to coercion; highlighting the forms of apologies, and selecting those that need legislative regulation; satisfaction of public enquiry for corresponding modification of the means of protection of intangible assets. The goal of this article lies in the attempt to understand them. The research is conducted in the context of the corresponding international legal norms, as well as thematic generalization of current norms of the Russian legislation. The novelty of this work is defined by the multi-aspect original analysis of apologizing as a legal phenomenon, detection of legislative gaps, and author’s vision on the solution to the problems that arose in light of these gaps.


Keywords:

apologies submitting, remedies, honor, dignity, business reputation, non-material values, defamation, untruthful detractive information, freedom of expression, moral consideration

References
1. Rozhkova M.A. Sudebnaya praktika po delam o zashchite delovoi reputatsii yuridicheskikh lits i predprinimatelei // Prilozhenie k ezhemesyachnomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu «Khozyaistvo i pravo». 2010. № 2. S. 38.
2. Gavrilov E.V. Prinesenie izvineniya kak sposob zashchity chesti, dostoinstva i delovoi reputatsii // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2012. № 7.
3. Erdelevskii A.M. O novykh sudebnykh podkhodakh k zashchite neimushchestvennykh blag // Material podgotovlen dlya sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
4. Maleina M.N. Vozlozhenie obyazannosti prinesti izvinenie kak sposob zashchity neimushchestvennykh prav // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2009. № 11.
5. Makarova T.N. Voprosy zashchity chesti, dostoinstva i delovoi reputatsii v sudebnoi praktike // Kommentarii sudebnoi praktiki. Vypusk 10. Pod red. K.B. Yaroshenko. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskaya literatura», 2004.
6. Ioffe O.S. Novaya kodifikatsiya sovetskogo grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva i okhrana chesti i dostoinstva grazhdan // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1962. № 7. S. 64 – 65; Kuznetsov N.M. Soderzhanie otnoshenii po zashchite chesti, dostoinstva i delovoi reputatsii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009. S 18; Sedugin P.I. Sudebnaya praktika po delam o zashchite chesti i dostoinstva // Nauchnyi kommentarii sudebnoi praktiki po grazhdanskim delam za 1964-1965 gg. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1966. S. 63.
7. Fleishits E. A. Lichnye prava v grazhdanskom prave Soyuza SSR i kapitalisticheskikh stran // Uchenye zapiski VIYuN. M., 1941. Vyp. 6. S. 149; Reznik G. M., Sklovskii K. I. Chest'. Dostoinstvo. Delovaya reputatsiya: spory s uchastiem SMI. M.: Statut, 2006. S. 10 – 12; Gliskov A.A. Problemy kvalifikatsii klevety, sovershennoi putem rasprostraneniya negativnoi otsenochnoi kharakteristiki poterpevshego // Advokat. 2011. № 8.
8. Khavzhokova Z.B. Zashchita chesti, dostoinstva i delovoi reputatsii: teoriya i praktika grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009. S. 47 – 48.
9. Budyakova T.P. Izvinenie kak forma kompensatsii moral'nogo vreda v istorii rossiiskogo gosudarstva i prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2004. № 1.
10. Gusalova A.R. Grazhdansko-pravovaya zashchita delovoi reputatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Vladikavkaz, 2012. S. 6.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.