MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:
Lichidov A.A.
Claim on recognition of real right as non-existent in disputes on the rights to real estate
// Law and Politics.
2016. ¹ 9.
P. 1149-1154.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.9.16309 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=16309
Èñê î ïðèçíàíèè âåùíîãî ïðàâà îòñóòñòâóþùèì ïðè îñïàðèâàíèè ïðàâ íà íåäâèæèìîå èìóùåñòâî
Lichidov Aleksandr Andreevich
External doctoral candidate, the department of Civil Law and Procedure, South Ural State University; Legal Assistant, LLC UK"Uralkran"
454000, Russia, Chelyabinsk, Akademika Sakharova Street 32
|
lichidov74@gmail.com
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.9.16309
Received:
05-09-2015
Published:
28-09-2016
Abstract:
This article examines the problematic issues pertaining to means of defense of civil rights. The author explores the possibility of defense against violation of rights through the means unlisted in the Russian Civil legislation, as well as the practice of their application in arbitration courts. Analysis is conducted on the points of views that exist in legal literature regarding the discussion on applicability of the norms on laches towards the demand for recognition of the right to ownership and claim to recognition absence of the real right. This work raises the issue of the possibility of application of claim to recognize the absence of real right in liability dispute. The author also examines the issue of implementation of the term of laches on claims to recognize the absence of real right, as well as the justification of the possibility to apply this term in a claim. A comparison is made between the declaratory judgment and nugatory claim.
Keywords:
Real estate, Laches, Dispute, Real right, Real action, Claim, Declaratory judgment , Court, Civil law, right
References
1. Podshivalov T.P. Pravovaya priroda iska ob osparivanii zaregistrirovannogo prava na nedvizhimost' // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. – 2014. – ¹ 5. – S. 76-83.
2. Vitryanskii V.V., Braginskii M.I. Dogovornoe pravo. kniga pervaya. – M.: Statut, 2012.-847 c.
3. Krasnova S.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy klassifikatsii grazhdansko-pravovykh sposobov zashchity // Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. – 2011. – ¹ 2. – S. 170-176.
4. Podshivalov T.P. Kriterii sootnosheniya veshchnykh i obyazatel'stvennykh iskov // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2015. – ¹ 1. – S. 49-56.
5. Lapach V. Problema osparivaniya prava // Khozyaistvo i pravo. – 2007. – ¹ 2. – S. 109-114.
6. Petryaev A. Isk o priznanii prava otsutstvuyushchim // EZh-yurist. – 2014. – ¹ 1-2 // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
7. Il'ichev P. Iskovaya davnost' problemy teorii i pravoprimenitel'noi praktiki: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2014. – 171 s.
8. Podshivalov T.P. Pravila primeneniya iskovoi davnosti dlya vindikatsii // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. – 2013. – ¹
9. – S. 20-23. 9. Podshivalov T. Iskovaya davnost' dlya negatornogo iska de lege ferenda // Khozyaistvo i pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 84-87.
10. Lyushnya A.V. Isk o priznanii prava sobstvennosti i iskovaya davnost' // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. – 2005. – ¹
11. – S. 62-66. 11. Podshivalov T.P. Zapret obkhoda zakona v rossiiskom grazhdanskom zakonodatel'stve i sudebnoi praktike // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. – 2015. – ¹ 2. – S. 86-115.
12. Podshivalov T.P. Opredelenie nadlezhashchego sposoba zashchity veshchnykh prav v arbitrazhnoi praktike // Vestnik arbitrazhnoi praktiki. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 13-17.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
