Ответственность материнской компании по обязательствам  дочерней компании (проникновение за корпоративный занавес) по праву Англии

Раевская Татьяна Сергеевна

doi:10.7256/2454-0706.2009.10.1606


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Law and Politics

Reference:

Raevskaya T.S. // Law and Politics. 2009. № 10. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2009.10.1606 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=1606

Ответственность материнской компании по обязательствам дочерней компании (проникновение за корпоративный занавес) по праву Англии

Raevskaya Tat'yana Sergeevna

raevskaya@mail.transinvestbank.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Theory"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2009.10.1606

Received:

17-09-2009

Published:

1-10-2009

References

1. Zak A.Yu. Vozmozhno li primenenie rossiyskim sudom doktriny «pripodnimaniya vuali»?//Pravovye problemy razvitiya social'noy sfery v Rossiyskoy Federacii. Doklady i soobscheniya V Mezhdunarodnoy konferencii/g. Moskva/14 aprelya 2005 g.

2. Grigorash I.V. Zavisimye yuridicheskie lica v grazhdanskom prave. Moskva. Volters Kluver. 2007.

3. Kibenko E.R. Korporativnoe pravo Velikobritanii: Zakonodatel'stvo. Precedenty. Kommentarii. Yustinian. Kiev.2003.

4. Petrovicheva Yu.V. «Akcionernoe zakonodatel'stvo Anglii i Rossii. Sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz». Moskva. Norma». 2002.

5. E. Popova, E. Popov. Korporativnaya vual'//Hozyaystvo i pravo.2002.№12.

6. I.S.Shitkina. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost' osnovnogo obschestva po dolgam dochernego Korporativnyy yurist.2005. №1.

7. Shevchenko G.N. «Snyatie korporativnyh pokrovov» v rossiyskom grazhdanskom zakonodatel'stve//Sovremennoe pravo.2005.№3.

8. Fedchuk V.D. Pravo kompaniy Anglii: sovremennaya koncepciya korporativnogo lica (korporativnogo zanavesa) // Vneshneekonomicheskiy byulleten'. 2003.

9. Fedchuk V.D. Risk i l'goty za chuzhoy schet // Zakon. - M.: Izvestiya.2004.№ 11.

10. Fedchuk V.D.Pravovoy rezhim zavisimyh kompaniy v prave Anglii: proniknovenie za korporativnyy zanaves//Investicii v Rossii.2008.№ 4.

11. Fedchuk V.D. De fakto zavisimost' de jure nezavisimyh yuridicheskih lic: proniknovenie za korporativnyy zanaves v prave veduschih zarubezhnyh stran. Volters Kluver. Moskva.2008.

12. Fedchuk V.D. Koncepciya yuridicheskogo lica v prave Anglii: istoricheskie korni i sovremennost'//Yuridicheskiy mir.2008.№ 5.

13. Len Sealey, Sarah Worthington “Cases and Materials in Company Law”.Eight edition. Oxford University Press. 2008

14. Eilis Ferran. Company law and corporate finance. Oxford University Press.1999.

15. Ottolenghi S. “From Peeping behind the Corporate Veil to Ignoring it Completely”. The Modern law review. Vol. 53. № 3. 1990.

16. D.D. Prentice. Fraudulent Trading: Parent Company’s Liability for the Debts of its Subsidiary//Law quarterly review. Vol.103.London.1987.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.