Предупреждение причинения вреда в США

Подкорытов Никита Сергеевич

doi:10.7256/2454-0706.2015.5.15156


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Law and Politics

Reference:

Podkorytov N.S. Tort prevention in the United States // Law and Politics. 2015. № 5. P. 708-711. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2015.5.15156 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=15156

Предупреждение причинения вреда в США

Podkorytov Nikita Sergeevich

Post-graduate student, department of Civil Law, The Russian Law Academy of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; Secretary of Court Proceedings, Intellectual Property Court

117292, Russia, Moscow, Profsoyuznaya Street 20/9, unit #308

naket16@yandex.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Conflict: tools of stabilization"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2015.5.15156

Received:

28-04-2015

Published:

19-05-2015

Abstract: The subject of this research is the analysis of the United States legislation in the area of “tort prevention”. The author presents the practice of application of this institution, legal doctrines used in the United States of America, comparative analysis with the legislation of the Russian Federation, as well as the German legislation. In addition to studying the civil legal institution of tort prevention, the author conducts a research in the area of sources of high risk. The author proposes to form a legislative designation of the sources of high risk, borrowing the concept of calculated risk from the US legislation, and implementing the legal precedent with regards to cases related to tort prevention as a doctrinal and basic approach towards regulation of relations.

Keywords:

source of high risk, tort prevention, legal precedent, legislation, United States of America, dlict, doctrine, concept, court, civil process

References

1. Fleishits E.A. Obyazatel'stva iz prichineniya vreda i iz neosnovatel'nogo obogashcheniya. M., 1951, str. 131;
2. Agarkov M.M. Vozniknovenie obyazatel'stv iz prichineniya vreda // Grazhdanskoe pravo. M., 1944. T. 1, str. 328;
3. Krasavchikov O.A. Vozmeshchenie vreda, prichinennogo istochnikom povyshennoi opasnosti. M.: Yurid. Liter. 1966, str. 99.
4. Shishkin S. Istochnik povyshennoi opasnosti i ego vidy // "Rossiiskaya yustitsiya", 2002, № 12, str. 20.
5. Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii chast' 2 ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ;
6. Atomic Energy Act USA of 1946 of 1946;
7. Clean Water Act of 1972.
8. Norfolk & Western Railway Company v. Ayres;
9. Beninati v. Black Rock City, LLC 10_ Anderson v. Pacific Gas & E. Co 11) Alwin v. State Farm and Casualty Co 12) Langan v. Valicopters, Inc 13) Monsanto Co. V. Geertsom Seed Farms 14) MsCormick v Great Western Power 15) Schriner v. Pa. Power and Light Co 16) Charles CASTONGUAY et al. v. Todd PLOURDE et al 17) American Electric Power Co. V. Connecticut. 18) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus_of_negligence; 19) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrahazardous_activity

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.