Getman-Pavlova I., Kalugina S.
Choice-of-law regulation of the contractual obligations in the State of Oregon (USA)
// Law and Politics.
2015. № 4.
P. 515-529.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2015.4.14854 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14854
Коллизионное регулирование договорных обязательств в штате Орегон (США)
Getman-Pavlova Irina
PhD in Law
Scientific editor, "Law" journal of the Higher School of Economics; Docent, National Research University "Higher School of Economics", department of International Public and Private Law
Abstract: The Russian law doctrine practically has no research on the statutory legislation on Private International Law (PIL) of the United States, even though this country did participate in the global processes of codification of PIL. The subject of this research is the legislative act of the State of Oregon on the choice of law to be applied towards the contractual obligations (2001, rev. 2013). This act codifies the precedent of the State of Oregon; the structure of the act reflects its “judicial orientation”, meant to serve as a guide for the judges. At the same time, the act is “scientifically oriented”, and its positions reproduce the most successful doctrinal experience of American Choice-of-Law Revolution. The authors conclude that the rules of the act are based on the synthesis of flexible choice-of-law approaches and certain norms. Oregon’s legislators were able to achieve the optimal balance between flexibility and predictability of the choice-of-law regulation of contracts.
Keywords:
conflict approach, choice-of-law rules, Private International Law, the USA, Oregon, codification, contractual obligations, conflict regulation, the American choice-of-law Revolution, statutory legislation
References
1. Lunts L.A. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: V 3-kh tomakh. M.: Spark, 2002.
2. Merezhko A.A. Nauka mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: istoriya i sovremennost'. Kiev: «Takson», 2006.
3. Monastyrskii E.Yu. Gospodstvuyushchie doktriny kollizionnogo prava v SShA: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1999.
4. Rubanov A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy vzaimodeistviya natsional'nykh pravovykh sistem. M.: Nauka, 1984.
5. Get'man-Pavlova I.V., Akhrimenko M.A. Kollizionnye podkhody v sovremennom zakonodatel'stve, doktrine i sudebnoi praktike SShA // Voprosy pravovedeniya. 2014. № 1. S. 340–420.
6. Kenagy David R. The Oregon Law Commission at Ten: Finding Vision for the Future in the Functions of the Past // 44 Willamette L. Rev. 169 (2007).
7. Symeonides Symeon C. Oregon’s Choice-of-Law Codification for Contract Conflicts: An Exegesis // 44 Willamette L. Rev. (2007). P. 205–288.
8. Nafziger James A.R. Oregon's Project to Codify Choice-of-Law Rules // Louisiana Law Review. 2000. Vol. 60. P. 1189–1225.
9. Symeonides Symeon C. The American Choice-of-Law Revolution: Past, Present and Future. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006.
10. Symeonides Symeon C. Accommodative Unilateralism as a Starting Premise in Choice of Law / Balancing of Interests: Liber Amicorum Peter Hay (H. Rasmussen-Bonne, R. Freer, W. Lüke & W. Weitnauer., eds.). Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft GmbH, 2005. P. 417–434.
11. Boer T., de. Beyond Lex Loci Delicti: Conflicts Methodology and Multistate Torts in American Case Law. Deventer, 1987.
12. Juenger Fr. Choice of Law and Multistate Justice. Dordrecht; Boston; London, 1993.
13. Asoskov A.V. Osnovy kollizionnogo prava. M., 2012.
14. Baxter W.F. Choice of Law and the Federal System // Standford Law Review. 1963. Vol. 16.
15. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: Uchebnik. M.: «Yurait», 2011.
16. Symeonides Symeon C. Private International Law at the End of the 20th Century: Progress or Regress? Kluwer Law International, 2000.
17. Symeonides Symeon C. Issue-by-Issue Analysis and Dépeçage in Choice of Law: Cause and Effect // 45 The University of Toledo Law Review (2013).
18. Giuliano M., Lagarde P. Report on the Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations / North P. Contract conflicts. 355, 384 (1982).
19. Morris J.H.C. The Proper Law of Tort // 64 Harv. L. Rev. (1951). P. 881–945.
20. Nafziger James A.R. Oregon’s Conflicts Law Applicable to Contracts // 38 Willamette L. Rev. (2002).
21. Weintraub Russel J. Commentary on the Conflict of Laws. 355 (4th ed. 2001).
22. Symeonides Symeon C. Material Justice and Conflicts Justice in Choice of Law / International Conflict of Laws for the Third Millennium: Essays in Honor of Friedrich K. Juenger (P. Borchers & J. Zekoll, eds.), Transnational Publishers (2001). P. 125–140.
23. Kegel G. Paternal Home and Dream Home: Traditional Conflict of Laws and the American Reformers // 27 Am. J. Comp. L. 615, 616–617 (1979).
24. Currie B. Selected Essays on the Conflict of Laws. N.C., 1963.
25. D.V. Morozov Publichnoe pravo i kollizionnoe regulirovanie (sravnitel'no–pravovoi analiz zakonodatel'stva o mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave) // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2011. - 2. - C. 166 - 169.
26. Erpyleva N.Yu. Evolyutsiya kollizionnogo regulirovaniya v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave Rossii // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 7. - C. 960 - 984. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.7.12330.
27. Dzhimbeeva D.V. Tendentsii kollizionnogo regulirovaniya obyazatel'stv vsledstvie neosnovatel'nogo obogashcheniya // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2014. - 3. - C. 573 - 579.
28. Kanashevskii V.A. Sdelki po sliyaniyam i pogloshcheniyam (M&A) v aspekte mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2014. - 2. - C. 272 - 277.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
