Ответственность государства за искажение исторических фактов: международно-правовой аспект

Кривенкова Мария Витальевна

doi:10.7256/2454-0706.2016.5.14826


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Law and Politics

Reference:

Krivenkova M. Responsibility of a state for distortion of historical facts: international legal aspect // Law and Politics. 2016. № 5. P. 605-609. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.5.14826 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14826

Ответственность государства за искажение исторических фактов: международно-правовой аспект

Krivenkova Mariya

PhD in Law

Associate professor of the Department of Private Law at Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University in Naberezhnye Chelny

423831, Russia, respublika Tatarstan, g. Naberezhnye Chelny, ul. Raskol'nikova, 67, kv. 48

amaria@inbox.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "XXI century International law"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2016.5.14826

Received:

28-03-2015

Published:

28-05-2016

Abstract: This article examines the currently relevant issue of distortion of historical facts by private parties and the official representatives of states. As one of the main causes the author considers the absence within the existing international law of responsibility for the countries in general, as well as responsibility for falsification and distortion of information about the current circumstances, or those that took place in the past. For the purpose of developing the approach towards the solution of the aforementioned problem from the perspective of international law, the author examines and analyzes the positions of the separate legal acts (obligatory for execution by the participating states, recommended, and projects of such acts), as well as the norms of the Russian legislation that hold criminal and administrative responsibility for denying the facts established by the sentence of the International Military Tribunal for trial and punishment of the chief war criminals of the European countries of the axis; approval of crimes established by the same sentence; as well as spread of the intentionally false testimony about the activity of USSR during the World War II. The article conducts a legal analysis of the Russian and international legal norms that regulate responsibility for falsification and distortion of historical facts. The author comes to the conclusion that there is a pressing need for the international legal norms which not only establish the unlawfulness of the actions themselves, but also codify the international legal responsibility of the states for the corresponding illegal activity.

Keywords:

Criminal responsibility, Falsification, Domestic law, International relations, Hold responsibility, State, International legal responsibility, Formation of public opinion, Distortion of historical facts, International legal violation

References

1. Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka (prinyata General'noi Assambleei OON 10.12.1948) // Rossiiskaya gazeta. – 1995.-№67.
2. Doklad Komissii po nauke i tekhnike v tselyakh razvitiya / Dok. OON E/CN.16/1995/L.2. 22 May 1995. URL: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G95/517/71/PDF/G9551771.pdf?OpenElement (data obrashcheniya 20.03.2015)
3. Dok. OON A/RES/56/83. URL: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/477/99/PDF/N0147799.pdf?OpenElement (data obrashcheniya 29.03.2015)
4. Idayatov A.K. Transformatsiya roli mirnykh sposobov razresheniya mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov v usloviyakh informatsionnogo obshchestva. – 2013. – №2 (71). – S. 14-16.
5. Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: feder. zakon ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ [red. ot 08.03.2015] // Rossiiskaya gazeta. – 2001. – № 256.
6. Konventsiya OON 1998 g. O dostupe k informatsii, uchastii obshchestvennosti v protsesse prinyatiya reshenii i dostupe k pravosudiyu po voprosam, kasayushchimsya okruzhayushchei sredy. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/orhus.shtml (data obrashcheniya 20.03.2015)
7. Karpovich O. G. Voprosy prav cheloveka i natsional'noi bezopasnosti v SShA // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. – 2012. – №1. – S. 36-40.
8. Kurdyukov G. I. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie norm mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava // Rossiiskii ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. Spetsial'nyi vypusk. – 2005. – S. 112-118.
9. Ob utverzhdenii sostava Komissii pri Prezidente Rossiiskoi Federatsii po formirovaniyu i podgotovke rezerva upravlencheskikh kadrov, izmenenii i priznanii utrativshimi silu nekotorykh aktov Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 14.02.2012 g. №183 // Rossiiskaya gazeta. – 2009. – № 89.
10. Orlov A. A. Nachalo Vtoroi mirovoi voiny kak povod k fal'sifikatsii istorii // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. – 2009. – №S4. – S. 332-336.
11. O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii: feder. zakon ot 05.05.2014 g. № 128-FZ // Rossiiskaya gazeta. – 2014. – № 101.
12. O Komissii pri Prezidente Rossiiskoi Federatsii po protivodeistviyu popytkam fal'sifikatsii istorii v ushcherb interesam Rossii: Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 15.05.2009 g. №549 // Rossiiskaya gazeta. – 2009. – № 89.
13. Rekomendatsiya o razvitii i ispol'zovanii mnogoyazychiya i vseobshchem dostupe k kiberprostranstvu. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/multilingualism_recommendation.shtml (data obrashcheniya 29.03.2015)
14. Sazonova K.L. Osnovaniya mezhdunarodno-pravovoi otvetstvennosti gosudarstv // Yuridicheskaya nauka. – 2012. – №4. – S. 77-79.
15. Sereda M.Yu. Zakreplenie prava na dostup v set' Internet v mezhdunarodno-pravovykh aktakh i zakonodatel'stve zarubezhnykh stran // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. – 2013. – №5 (74). – S. 44-47.
16. Skvortsov L.V. Teoriya istiny: tsivilizatsionnyi aspekt // Kul'turologiya. – 2005. – №2. – S.177-214.
17. Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: feder. zakon. ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ [red. ot 08.03.2015] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 1996. – №25. – St. 2954
18. Sazonova K.L. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii: problemy i perspektivy // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 16 - 25. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wl/article_371.html
19. A. A. Borisenkov Mirovaya politika —
vid politicheskogo vliyaniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 49 - 56.
20. Karyakin V.V. Sovreemnnye krizisy i konflikty: osobennsoti, stsenarii razvitiya i predotvrashchenie // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 446 - 457. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11422.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.