Ñòàòüÿ 'ÍÅÊÎÒÎÐÛÅ ÏÐÎÁËÅÌÛ ÏÐÎÂÅÐÊÈ ÂÅÐÑÈÈ ÏÐÈ×ÈÍÅÍÈß ÑÌÅÐÒÈ ÈÇ ÎÃÍÅÑÒÐÅËÜÍÎÃÎ ÎÐÓÆÈß ÏÎ ÍÅÎÑÒÎÐÎÆÍÎÑÒÈ' - æóðíàë 'Ïðàâî è ïîëèòèêà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

ÍÅÊÎÒÎÐÛÅ ÏÐÎÁËÅÌÛ ÏÐÎÂÅÐÊÈ ÂÅÐÑÈÈ ÏÐÈ×ÈÍÅÍÈß ÑÌÅÐÒÈ ÈÇ ÎÃÍÅÑÒÐÅËÜÍÎÃÎ ÎÐÓÆÈß ÏÎ ÍÅÎÑÒÎÐÎÆÍÎÑÒÈ

Komarov Andrei Igorevich



dermkrim@jur.dvgu.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2009.7.1426

Received:

17-06-2009


Published:

1-7-2009


References
Churlyaeva I.V. Otvetstvennost' za prichinenie smerti po neostorozhnosti: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. - Rostov-na-Donu. - 2004

Lyapunov Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za deystviya, privedshie k neostorozhnomu prichineniyu smerti // Sov. yusticiya. 1973, ¹9.

Bezborodov D.A. Sovmestnost' deyaniya v neostorozhnom prestuplenii: o celesoobraznosti izmeneniya podhodov k issledovaniyu // Rossiyskaya yusticiya, 2007. ¹ 6.

Dagel' P.S. Primenenie ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya, sozdayuschee opasnost' dlya zhizni lyudey, dolzhno byt' nakazuemo // Sov. Yusticiya, 1967, ¹ 18.

Yarovenko V.V. Proverka versiy o neostorozhnoy vine pri ubiystve iz ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya // Problemy bor'by s prestupnoy nebrezhnost'yu. Vyp. 1.- Vladivostok, 1976.

Yarovenko V.V. Nekotorye aspekty dokazyvaniya neostorozhnoy formy viny // Problemy bor'by s prestupnoy neostorozhnost'yu. – Vladivostok, 1978.

Kalinovskiy V.A., Komarov A.I. Proverka versii obvinyaemoy o prichinenii smerti po neostorozhnosti // Pravo i politika. ¹ 8 (104), 2008.



Borodin S.V. Kvalifikaciya ubiystv po deystvuyuschemu zakonodatel'stvu. – M.: Izd-vo Yurid. lit., 1966.

Hasan B. I. Osobennosti sokrytiya prestupnoy deyatel'nosti po ugolovnym delam, svyazannym s primeneniem ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya // Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Vypusk 69. Kriminalisticheskie harakteristiki v metodike rassledovaniya prestupleniy. – Sverdlovsk: UrGU., 1978.

Lyubchenko A.A. Nekotorye kommentarii k metodike postroeniya i proverki versiy ob inscenirovke samoubiystv.// «Chernye dyry» v Rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2007. ¹1.

Yarovenko V.V. K voprosu o primenenii special'nyh znaniy pri issledovanii oruzhiya, patronov i sledov vystrela //Protivodeystvie organizovannoy prestupnosti: ugolovno-processual'nye i kriminalisticheskie aspekty bor'by s torgovley lyud'mi, nezakonnym oborotom narkotikov i oruzhiya, ekologicheskimi prestupleniyami: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy 10-letiyu kafedry ugolovnogo processa, kriminalistiki i pravovoy informatiki RGU im. I. Kanta / Pod. Red. T.S. Volcheckoy. – Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I. Kanta, 2008.




Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.