|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:
Ambartsumyan S.G.
Information Technology in the Law: History, Problems and Prospects
// Law and Politics.
2015. № 1.
P. 31-38.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2015.1.14243 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14243
Информационные технологии в праве: история, проблемы, перспективы
Ambartsumyan Samvel Gaikovich
PhD in Technical Science
Competitor of the Department of Criminal Law, Moscow State University. MV Lomonosov
119991, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Leninskie Gory, 1
|
tatev2010@rambler.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2015.1.14243
Received:
18-01-2015
Published:
31-01-2015
Abstract:
The subject of this article is the application of the new technologies (information and communication technologies) in law practice. Such aspects of the topic are studied as history of the use of ICT in law; the common problems of this use are discussed. In order to help the reader to understand the given material, the author gives the most common terms, definitions and explanations of mathematical logic in law. The author underlines the importance of the development of such a problem as artificial intelligence use in law and limits of this use. The following methods were used in the research: historical and logical methods of knowledge; comparative-historical method. The author concludes that, though there are some difficulties in the development of information and communication technologies, the upcoming applications of those technologies in legal practice are very big
Keywords:
Law, Legal Cybernetics, Information Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, Logics, enforcement, computer, internet, communication, automation
References
1. Kerimov D.A., O stanovlenii i zadachakh pravovoi kibernetiki, Voprosy kibernetiki. Vypusk 40. Pravovaya Kibernetika. AN SSSR, M., Sov. radio,1977,C.21
2. Poshkyavichus V.A., Kiberneticheskii podkhod k pravu, Voprosy kibernetiki. Vypusk 40. Pravovaya Kibernetika. AN SSSR, M., Sov. radio,1977,S.38
3. Berth,E.M. and Krabbe,E.C.W.,1982, From Axiom to Dialogue, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, NewYork
4. Douglas Walton, Argumentation Method for Artificial Intelligence in Law,Springer,Berlin,2005,270p
5. Ephraim Nissan, Artificial Intelligence and Formalisms for Legal Evidence: An Introduction, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18:185-229, 2004.
6. Chris Reed, Douglas Walton and Fabrizio Mecagno, Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2007,vol.22:1,87-109,Cambridge University Press
7. Susskind, R (1999) The Challenge of the Information Society: Application of Advanced Technologies in Civil Litigation and Other Procedures.
8. Carnevali, D; Di Cocco M.C. (2001) An Innovation Process Embedded in a Strict Institutional Setting: ICT in Italian Judicial System. in M. Fabri, F. Contini, Justice and Technology in Europe. How ICT is Changing the Judicial Buisiness. Amsterdam. Kluwer Law International.
9. Fabri M.; Langbroek P.M. (2000) The Challenge of Change for Judicial Systems, Developing a Public Administration Perspective, IOS Press OHMSHA: Amsterdam, Washington.
10. Fabri M.; Langbroek P.M. (2000) The Challenge of Change for Judicial Systems, Developing a Public Administration Perspective, IOS Press OHMSHA: Amsterdam, Washington.
11. Taruffo M. (1998) Judicial Decisions and Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 6, 311–324.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
