Ñòàòüÿ 'Óãîëîâíî-ïðîöåññóàëüíûå ôóíêöèè: ýâîëþöèÿ ïîíÿòèÿ è ñèñòåìíàÿ îñíîâà' - æóðíàë 'Ïðàâî è ïîëèòèêà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Óãîëîâíî-ïðîöåññóàëüíûå ôóíêöèè: ýâîëþöèÿ ïîíÿòèÿ è ñèñòåìíàÿ îñíîâà

Sychev Dmitry

PhD in Law

Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of the St. Petersburg Law Institute (Branch) of the University of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation

194354, Russia, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Sikeirosa, 12

ds999rus@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2016.7.13286

Received:

13-10-2014


Published:

27-07-2016


Abstract: This work examines the origin and evolution of the concept of “criminal procedure function”. A comparison is made on various approaches to definition of the criminal procedure function. The author demonstrates the systemic foundation of functionality in the criminal procedure. From the dialectics positions, the author unifies the approach towards definition of the criminal procedure function as a branch of activity, viewing it as duties established by the law or rights of general character of the parties of the criminal procedure. The author makes a conclusion that the main directions of the criminal procedure work that are manifested in the criminal procedure carry systemic character. The author removes the contradictions in the outlooks upon the criminal procedure function as a branch of activity as established by the law or rights of general character of the parties of the criminal procedure.


Keywords:

Criminal process, Criminal procedure, Resolution, Protection, Criminal prosecution, General rights, System, Adversarial principle, Branches of criminal procedure, Criminal procedure function

References
1. Afanas'ev V. G. O tselostnykh sistemakh // Voprosy filosofii. 1980. – ¹ 6. – S. 62 – 78.
2. Boltoshev E.D. Funktsii prokurora v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09: Moskva, 2002. – 189 c. RGB OD, 61:03 – 12/556 – 4.
3. Vedeneev V.A. O primenenii sistemnogo podkhoda v issledovanii prava (vvedenie v metodologiyu problemy) // Problemy gosudarstva i prava: Trudy nauchnykh sotrudnikov i aspirantov. Vyp. 9. – M., 1974. – S. 50 – 60.
4. Volkova V.N., Denisov A.A. Teoriya sistem i sistemnyi analiz. M.: Yurait, 2010. – 679 s.
5. Gegel' G.V. Sochineniya. Tom V. – M.: SotsEkGiz, 1937. – 380 s.
6. Gegel' G.V. Sochineniya. Tom VII. M.: SotsEkGiz, 1934. – 715 s.
7. Golunskii S.A. Voprosy dokazatel'stvennogo prava v osnovakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Soyuza SSR i soyuznykh respublik // Voprosy sudoproizvodstva i sudoustroistva v novom zakonodatel'stve Soyuza SSR. M., 1959. – S. 145.
8. Gulyaev A.P. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo regulirovaniya deyatel'nosti sledovatelya: Dis. ... d – ra yurid. nauk. – M., 1988. – 186 s.
9. D.V. Danilenko. Ponyatie akta sudebnoi vlasti // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – ¹ 11.
10. Zelenetskii V.P. Funktsional'naya struktura prokurorskoi deyatel'nosti. – Khar'kov. Izd – vo Khar'kovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta, 1978. – 178 s.
11. Zinatullin Z.Z. Izbrannye trudy. – SPb.: Yuridicheskii Tsentr Press, 2013. – Tom 1. – 608 s.
12. Kerimov D.A. Metodologiya prava. Predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava. – M. : Izd – vo Sovremennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 2008. – 520 s.
13. D.V. Danilenko. Sostyazatel'nost' — universal'nyi printsip sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 4.
14. Lyublinskii P.I. Novaya teoriya ugolovnogo protsessa. – Pg.: Senat. tip., 1916. – 44 s.
15. Nazhimov V.P. Ob ugolovno – protsessual'nykh funktsiyakh. «Pravovedenie», 1973, ¹5. S 73 – 82.
16. Optner S.L. Sistemnyi analiz dlya resheniya delovykh i promyshlennykh problem. – M.: Sovetskoe radio, 1969. – 216 s.
17. Rakhunov R.D. Uchastniki ugolovno – protsessual'noi deyatel'nosti po sovetskomu pravu. – M., Gosyurizdat, 1961. – 277 s.
18. Rozhin V.P. Sotsial'nye sistemy i ikh zakony // Filosofskie i sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. Uchenye zapiski kafedr obshchestvennykh nauk vuzov Leningrada. – L., 1974. – S. 10.
19. Sergeevskii N.D. Russkoe ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. – SPb., 1887. – 315 s.
20. Strogovich M.S. Priroda sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa i printsip sostyazatel'nosti. – M., 1939. – 152 s.
21. Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. – T 1. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka», 1968. – 468 s.
22. Strogovich M.S. Ugolovnoe presledovanie v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse / Otv. red.: Grodzinskii M.M. – M.: Izd – vo AN SSSR, 1951. – 191 c.
23. Tushev A.A. Prokuror v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Sistema funktsii i polnomochii. Diss. dokt. yur. nauk: 12.00.09. – Krasnodar, 2006. – 384 s. RGB OD, 71 07 – 12/13.
24. Fel'dshtein G.S. Lektsii po ugolovnomu sudoproizvodstvu. – M.: Tipo – litografiya V. Rikhter, 1915. – 432 s.
25. Foinitskii I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Tom 1. – 4 – e izd. – S. – Pb.: Tip. t – va "Obshchestv. pol'za", 1912. – 579 c.
26. Fatkullin F.N. Obvinenie i sudebnyi prigovor. – Kazan', 1965. – 531 s.
27. Chel'tsov M.A. Ugolovnyi protsess. – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo yuridicheskoi literatury, 1951. – 511 s.
28. Chernyshev V.A. Problema funktsii v rossiiskoi nauke ugolovnogo protsessa: Avtoreferat diss. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09: Izhevsk, 1999. – 166 s. RGB OD, 61:00 – 12/202 – 8.
29. Shimanovskii V.V. K voprosu o protsessual'noi funktsii sledovatelya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse // Pravovedenie. – 1965. – ¹2. – S. 175 – 178.
30. El'kind P.S. K voprosu o funktsii obvineniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse // Voprosy teorii i praktiki prokurorskogo nadzora. Mezhvuzovskii nauchnyi sbornik. – Saratov: Izd – vo Sarat. un – ta, 1974. – S. 3 – 13.
31. Yakubovich N.A. Protsessual'nye funktsii sledovatelya // Problemy predvaritel'nogo sledstviya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – M., 1980. – S. 15.
32. D. V. Danilenko. Ponyatie iska v pozitivnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 8. – S. 1232-1247.
33. Larin A.M. Rassledovanie po ugolovnomu delu: protsessual'nye funktsii. M.: Yurid. lit.,1986. – 160 s
34. Zhuk O.D. Sistema ugolovno – protsessual'nykh funktsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiiskoi Federatsii // «Chernye dyry» v Rossiiskom Zakonodatel'stve. – 2003. – ¹ 4. – S. 416 – 421.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.