Ñòàòüÿ '«Áóíòóþùèé ÷åëîâåê» â ïðàâîâîì äèñêóðñå: íîâàÿ ïîïûòêà îïðàâäàíèÿ' - æóðíàë 'Ïðàâî è ïîëèòèêà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

«Áóíòóþùèé ÷åëîâåê» â ïðàâîâîì äèñêóðñå: íîâàÿ ïîïûòêà îïðàâäàíèÿ

Skiperskikh Aleksandr Vladimirovich

ORCID: 0000-0001-8587-7415

Doctor of Politics

Professor, Department of Philosophy and Social Science, Bunin Yelets State University

399770, Russia, Lipetsk region, Yelets, Sverdlova str., 13, sq. 27

pisatels@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2015.3.13160

Received:

28-09-2014


Published:

19-03-2015


Abstract: Existence of the problem of “the protester” within the legal political discourse serves as a proof of a constant human strive towards broadening of their civil rights and  liberties. The degree of these liberties directly depends on the definition of the political regime and the existing legal system that motivates a person to broaden their liberties, as well as serving as a form of repression that limits the rights and liberties of a person. “The protester” is viewed differently within various legal discourses, which testifies of the existing difference in perception of the subject of liberty that pertains to the diversity of the cultural, political and legal traditions. The author tends to believe that the image of “the protester”, as the society’s right to liberty and demonstration of a protest is differently legitimized by one or another cultural tradition, which reflects in the amount of their rights and liberties that are allocated to them by the legal discourse. The forming of a certain tendency for protest, its technologies and aesthetics completely depends on the definition of the political regime that formulates specific requirements for the format of liberty within the framework of legal discourse.


Keywords:

Protest, protester, authority, law, culture, society, political protest, legal discourse, liberty, resistance

References
1. Aristotel'. Sochineniya: V 4 t. (per. S.A. Zhebeleva)-T. 4. – M.: Mysl', 1983. – 830 s.
2. Boden Zh. Shest' knig o gosudarstve.-Antologiya mirovoi filosofii v chetyrekh tomakh. Tom 2.-Evropeiskaya filosofiya ot epokhi Vozrozhdeniya po epokhu Prosveshcheniya. Redaktor-sostavitel' vtorogo toma i avtor vstupitel'noi stat'i V.V.Sokolov. Seriya «Filosofskoe nasledie». Akademiya nauk SSSR. Institut filosofii.-M.: Izd-vo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi literatury «Mysl'», 1970. – S. 141 – 147.
3. Garr T. Pochemu lyudi buntuyut. – SPb.: Piter, 2005. – 461 s.
4. Gegel' G. Filosofiya prava. – M.: Mysl', 1990. – 524 s.
5. Grotsii G. O prave voiny i mira.-M.: Ladomir, 1994. – 868 s.
6. Zhidkov O.A., Lafitskii V.I. Soedinennye Shtaty Ameriki: Konstitutsiya i zakonodatel'stvo.-M.: Progress, Univers, 1993. – 769 s.
7. Kamyu A. Buntuyushchii chelovek. Filosofiya. Politika. Iskusstvo. Per. s fr. – M.: Politizdat, 1990. – 415 s.
8. Makiavelli N. Gosudar'. Rassuzhdeniya o pervoi dekade Tita Liviya.-M.: Tranzitkniga, 2006. – 461 s.
9. Sartr Zh.P. Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoi ontologii (per. s fr. V.I. Kolyadko). – M.: Respublika, 2004. – 639 c.
10. Skiperskikh A.V. Vyzovy provintsial'nogo protesta. // Svobodnaya mysl'.-¹ 12. – 2011. – S. 45-50.
11. Skiperskikh A.V. Spetsifika provintsial'nogo politicheskogo protesta v sovremennoi Rossii (na primere goroda El'tsa Lipetskoi oblasti). // Teoriya i praktika politicheskikh issledovanii.-¹ 2-3. – 2012. – S. 58 – 69.
12. Todorov Ts. Dukh Prosveshcheniya. – M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanii, 2010. – 120 s.
13. Filosofiya. Khrestomatiya / Sost. Prof. P.S.Gurevich. – M.: Gardariki, 2002. – 453 s.
14. Fuko M. Vosstavat' bespolezno? (per. s fr. V. Akulovoi i D. Potemkina) // Neprikosnovennyi zapas. 2011. ¹ 5 (79).-S. 16-20.
15. Shmitt K. Teoriya partizana (per. s nem. Yu.Yu. Korintsa). – M.: Praksis, 2007. – 301 s.
16. Tilly C. Collective Violence in European Perspective.-University of Michigan, 1978. – 70 p.
17. Skiperskikh A.V. Homo Politicus: mezhdu buntom i podchineniem // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-6.-C. 682-688. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.6.12285.
18. Gurevich P.S.. Zlo protiv dobra // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.12.10162
19. Parkhomenko R.N.. Yu. Khabermas o sovremennoi demokratii // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.12.9516
20. I.V. Egorova. Khanna Arendt o massovoi kul'ture // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2013.2.9596
21. Parkhomenko R.N.. Diskussii o liberalizme v sovremennoi Rossii // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.9067
22. Bartashevich S.V.. Kategoriya svobody v nalogovykh pravootnosheniyakh: filosofskie predposylki resheniya problemy // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.4780
23. R.N. Parkhomenko. Svoboda kak filosofiya bogochelovechestva (N. Berdyaev) // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. – 2013. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.7.8106
24. Rubanik S.A.. Erikh Fromm o gosudarstvenno-pravovom razvitii v sovremennom globaliziruemom mire // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.6.5993
25. R.N. Parkhomenko. Yu. Khabermas o ponyatii idei svobody // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.13
26. R.N. Parkhomenko. Ponyatie idei svobody v antichnoi i srednevekovoi filosofii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.12
27. N.V. Tishchenko. Svoboda i nesvoboda v prostranstve literaturnykh tekstov: diskurs-analiz proizvedenii, posvyashchennykh GULAGu // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.04.8
28. E.M. Spirova. Fenomen dukha v filosofskoi antropologii // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.01.4
29. T.A. Gorelova. Modernizatsiya ili obshchestvennyi progres // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.01.6
30. A.V. Nikandrov. Norberto Bobbio o politike i kul'ture: nezavisimost' intellektualov i avtonomiya kul'tury // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
31. R.N. Parkhomenko. Liberalizm v rossii: obzor nauchnoi literatury // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-1
32. Aleinikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 7. - C. 94 - 140. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.