Tagaeva S.N.
On the essence of family law liability in the Republic of Tajikistan
// Law and Politics.
2016. № 11.
P. 1406-1413.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.11.12057 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=12057
К сущности семейно-правовой ответственности в Республике Таджикистан
Tagaeva Sanavbar Nazirkulovna
Doctor of Law
Docent, the department of International Law and Comparative Jurisprudence, Russian-Tajik Slavonic University
734025, Tajikistan, Dushanbe, Tursunadze Street 30, office #15
Abstract: The author substantiates the position on the existence of an independent type of liability – that of family law. This work explores various views on the essence of family law liability. The author determines the distinctive features of family law liability and substantiates its interbranch nature. The author supports the notion of family law liability as protective legal relations, which emerge in cases of violation of the rights of family members within the framework of regulative family legal relations, established by law or an agreement. This work is the first in Tajikistan to present the substantiation of the essence of family legal liability as protective legal relations, emerging as the result of legal agreement or commission of family delict that has a interbranch nature. At the same time, the author believes that the family law liability is a separate type of legal responsibility. Therefore, the author distinguishes the contractual and non-contractual family law liability.
Keywords:
contract, delict, regulative legal relations, family legal relations, object of legal infraction, liability, legal relations, family, protective legal relations, family law liability
References
1. Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik. T. 1. / Pod red. A.P. Sergeeva, Yu.K. Tolstogo.-M.: Prospekt, 1999.-S. 533.
2. Antokol'skaya M. Semeinoe pravo.-M., 2003.-333 s.
3. Bratus' S.N. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i zakonnost'.-M. 1976.-215 s.
4. Vvedenie v filosofiyu otvetstvennosti. Monografiya / A. I. Orekhovskii [i dr.]; pod obshch. red. A. I. Orekhovskogo. — Novosibirsk: SibGUTI, 2005.-186 s.
5. Vorozheikin E.M. Pravovye osnovy braka i sem'i.-M.: Yurid. lit., 1969.-156 s.
6. Glushkova L.I. Otvetstvennost' v sovetskom semeinom prave. Avtoref. dis… kand.yurid.nauk.-M., 1982.-24 s.
7. Grishaev S.P. Semeinoe pravo v voprosakh i otvetakh.-M.: Novaya pravovaya kul'tura, 2008. – Elektronnaya spravochnaya sistema «Garant» [data obrashcheniya 12.03.2012].
8. Emel'yanov A.S. Realizatsiya okhranitel'noi funktsii finansovogo prava: Avtoref. diss.... d-ra yurid. nauk.-M., 2005.-42 s.
9. Zvyagintseva L.M. Mery zashchity v sovetskom semeinom prave.-Sverdlovsk, 1980.-202 s.
10. Zvyagintseva L.M. Osobennosti semeino-pravovykh sanktsii//Pravovedenie.-1980.-№5. –S.53-56.
11. Lifshits R.Z. Teoriya prava. –M., 1994.-224 s.
12. Malein N.S. Zashchita semeinykh prav.-M., 1972.-216 s.
13. Malein N.S. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i spravedlivost'. –M., 1992.-215 s.
14. Makhmudov M.A. Pravovye sredstva sokhraneniya i ukrepleniya sem'i v Tadzhikistane. –Dushanbe: TNU, 1998. –156 s.
15. Makhmudov M.A. Rol' sovetskogo semeinogo prava v sokhranenii i ukreplenii braka: Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 1986.-249 s.
16. Podkorytova O.V. Zashchita lichnykh neimushchestvennykh prav i zakonnykh interesov roditelei kak uchastnikov semeinykh otnoshenii. Diss…kand.yurid.nauk.-Dushanbe, 2009.-194 s.
17. Romovskaya Z.V. Zashchita v sovetskom semeinom prave.-L'vov, 1985.-180 s.
18. Sidorova S.A. Voprosy primeneniya mer grazhdansko-pravovoi i semeino-pravovoi otvetstvennosti v semeinom prave: dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. –Ryazan',2007.-216 s.
19. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii/ L.N. Bashkatov [i dr.]/ otv. red. I.L. Petrukhin.-M.: TK Velbi, 2006.-644 s.
20. Obshche uchenie o pravootnoshenii. M.:Yurid. lit. 1974.-348 s.
21. Khachaturov R.L., Lipinskii D.A. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. –Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo R.Arslanova «Yuridicheskii tsentr Press», 2007. –950 s.
22. Cherdantsev A.F., Kozhevnikov S. N. O ponyatii i soderzhanii yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti // Pravovedenie.-1976.-№ 5.-S. 39-48.
23. Chicherova L.E. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost' v semeinom prave//Tsivilisticheskie zapiski: Vyp. 5. Problemy kodifikatsii grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva v RF// Pod red. V.A. Rybakova, A.Ya. Grishko.-M.: Yurist, 2004. –S.592-602.
24. Chicherova L.E. Otvetstvennost' v semeinom prave: dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. –Ryazan',2004.-212 s. Rostovskaya I.V.. Kharakteristika sovremennogo konstitutsionnogo zakonodatel'stva o nesovershennoletnikh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
25. A. S. Galyautdinova. Sem'ya kak uchastnik nalogovykh pravootnoshenii // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
26. K.N. Averina. Osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya brachno-semeinykh otnoshenii, oslozhnennykh inostrannym elementom // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
27. Chuprina A.A. Dukhovno-nravstvennaya paradigma sem'i v usloviyakh sovremennoi Rossii // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. — 2014.-№ 2.-S.31-59. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2014.2.11058. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_11058.html
28. Gulyaikhin V.N. Sem'ya kak sub''ekt rannei pravovoi sotsializatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 7.-S.56-66. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.9007. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9007.html
29. Abel'beisov V.A.. Obzor zakonodatel'noi bazy v otnoshenii zhizneustroistva i vospitaniya detei-sirot i detei, ostavshikhsya bez popecheniya roditelei // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.11.5094
30. Afon'kin G.P. Sovremennye problemy pravovogo obespecheniya ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za semeinoe (domashnee) nasilie v Rossii // NB: Rossiiskoe politseiskoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.56-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.3.8912. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_8912.html
31. Abel'beisov V.A.. Siroty i deti, ostavshiesya bez popecheniya roditelei v sovremennoi Rossii // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 9. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.9.5093
32. Afon'kin G.P., Dodonov O.E.. Sovremennye problemy pravovogo obespecheniya ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za semeinoe (domashnee) nasilie v Rossii // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8702
33. A.A. Chuprina. Filosofskii kontekst osmysleniya sem'i kak indikatora kul'turnogo razvitiya obshchestva // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.2
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
