Ñòàòüÿ 'Êâàëèôèöèðóþùèå ïðèçíàêè ñîñòàâà ìåæäóíàðîäíîãî ïðåñòóïëåíèÿ â ìåæäóíàðîäíîì óãîëîâíîì ïðàâå ' - æóðíàë 'Ïðàâî è ïîëèòèêà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Êâàëèôèöèðóþùèå ïðèçíàêè ñîñòàâà ìåæäóíàðîäíîãî ïðåñòóïëåíèÿ â ìåæäóíàðîäíîì óãîëîâíîì ïðàâå

Ganibal Sidor Sidorovi

Professor, Distinguished Scientist of Science and Education

0000000, Bangladesh, g. Gaaga, ul. Ganibala, 123

prof_48kost@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2015.3.11524

Received:

28-06-2014


Published:

19-03-2015


Abstract: The main goal of this research is to devise a definition and determine the qualifying criteria of the elements of international crimes that are a byproduct of international legal norms (international agreements) and the status of the International Criminal Court. The actual topic of “legal definition of the qualifying criteria of the elements of an international crime within international criminal law” gained theoretical and practical importance from the very moment that the International Criminal Court was established and began its functioning. The author comes to the conclusion that a party can be held responsible for committing an international crime under the international criminal law only with the existence of the qualifying criteria of the elements of international crime that corresponds with the requirements of the International Criminal Court and other international legal norms that regulate the responsibility for the committed international crime.


Keywords:

International Criminal Court, international crime, international criminal law, qualifying criteria, complicity, private party, guilt, motive, criminal intent, causation

References
1. Antonyan Yu.M., Borodin S.V. Prestupnost' i psikhicheskie anomalii. M., 1997 g.
2. Akopov K.L., Kaufman M.A. i dr. Ob''ektivnaya storona prestupleniya (fakul'tativnye priznaki). M., 1995.
3. Kuris P. M. Mezhdunarodnye pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennost' gosudarst¬va. Vil'nyus, 1973. S. 126-127.
4. Kudryavtsev V.N. Ob''ektivnaya storona prestupleniya. M., 1960.
5. Kovalev M.I. Problemy ucheniya ob ob''ektivnoi storone sostava prestupleniya. Krasnoyarsk, 1991.
6. Leikina N.S. Lichnost' prestupnika i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost'. L., 1968. S. 57.
7. Menzhinskii V. I. Problema mezhdunarodnoi otvetstvennosti (V svete so-vetskoi kontseptsii mezhdunarodnogo prava). Avtoref. dis. na soiskanie uch. st. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1951. S. 15.
8. Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo v dokumentakh. M., 1996. S. 124.
9. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo. Ucheb. Posobie / Pod obshchei red. V. N. Kudryavtseva. M., 1999. S. 74.
10. Naumov A.V. Ugolovnyi zakon v usloviyakh perekhoda k rynochnoi ekonomike //SGP. 1991. ¹ 2. S. 35.
11. Naumov A.V. Predpriyatie na skam'e podsudimykh //SYu. 1992. ¹ 7. S.3.
12. Nyurnbergskii protsess nad glavnymi nemetskimi voennymi prestupnikami. Sbornik dokumentov. T. VII.M., 1961. S. 516.
13. Nyurnbergskii protsess//Sbornik materialov. M., 1955. T. II. S. 601-605.
14. Otvetstvennost' za voennye prestupleniya i prestupleniya protiv chelovechestva (Sbornik dokumentov). M.,1969. S. 42-43.
15. Piontkovskii A.A. Uchenie o prestuplenii po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. S. 358.
16. Rybakov Yu. M. Vooruzhennaya agressiya – tyagchaishee mezhdunarodnoe prestuplenie. M., 1980, S. 182.
17. Reshetov Yu.A. Bor'ba s mezhdunarodnymi prestupleniyami protiv mira i bezopasnosti. M., 1983. S. 28.
18. Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo. M., L., 1926. S. 35.
19. Smirnov L.N., Zaitsev E.B. Sud v Tokio. M., 1978. S.71-72.
20. Tagantsev N.S. Russkoi ugolovnoe pravo. Chast' obshchaya. T.I. SPb., 1902. S. 601.
21. Trainin A. N. Pravovye problemy Nyurnbergskogo protsessa. Sov. gos. i pravo. M. 1947, ¹ 3. S. 15.
22. Tunkin G.I. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. M., 1970. S. 431.
23. Timeiko G.V. Obshchee uchenie ob ob''ektivnoi storone prestupleniya. Rostov-na-Donu, 1997.
24. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast' / Pod red. A.I. Raroga 3-e izd. M. Eksmo, 2009. S. 94-115.
25. Ugolovnyi zakon. Opyt teoreticheskogo modelirovaniya. M., 1999. S. 78-79.
26. Ustimenko V.V. Spetsial'nyi sub''ekt prestupleniya. Khar'kov, 1998.
27. Kalamkaryan R.A.. Mezhdunarodnyi sud kak glavnyi sudebnyi organ Organizatsii Ob''edinennykh Natsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 210-232. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.7737.
28. Kostenko N.I.. Rol' Organizatsii Ob''edinennykh Natsii po resheniyu problem pravosudiya perekhodnogo perioda i gospodstva prava v konfliktnykh // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10012.
29. N. I. Kostenko. Organizatsiya Ob''edinennykh Natsii na puti k novomu soglasiyu po voprosam mezhdunarodnoi bezopasnosti // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹ 3.
30. D. E. Vidus. Otvetstvennost' gosudarstv za genotsid // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – ¹ 2. – S. 92-102.
31. R.A. Kalamkaryan. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 92-103. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.6.
32. N.I. Kostenko. Sub''ekty mezhdunarodnykh prestuplenii po mezhdunarodnomu ugolovnomu pravu. // Pravo i politika. – 2003. – ¹ 7.
33. D. E. Vidus. Vopros o gruppakh okhranyaemykh, konventsiei «O preduprezhdenii prestupleniya genotsida i nakazanii za nego» i identifikatsii zhertv genotsida // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 16-27.
34. N. I. Kostenko. Organizatsiya Ob''edinennykh Natsii v razvitii mezhdunarodnoi ugolovnoi yustitsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
35. Kostenko N.I.. Pravovye mekhanizmy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva v pravookhranitel'noi sfere. // Pravo i politika. – 2005. – ¹ 8.
36. N.N. Kostenko. Organizatsiya Ob''edinennykh Natsii na puti k novomu soglasiyu po voprosam mezhdunarodnoi bezopasnosti // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – ¹ 1.
37. N. I. Kostenko. Rol' mezhdunarodnogo prava v bor'be s terrorizmom. // Pravo i politika. – 2006. – ¹ 8.
38. N.I. Kostenko. Rol' organizatsii ob''edinennykh natsii v preduprezhdenii transnatsional'noi organizovannoi prestupnosti. // Pravo i politika. – 2003. – ¹ 9.
39. Proces des grands criminels de guerre devant le Tribunal militaire international. Texte officiel en langue frncaise, 42 volumes, Nuremberg, 1947-1949, t.I, p. 238.
40. Droit penal international, deuxion, Dalloz, 1979, p. 155.
41. The Law Reports of War Criminals, vol. II, p. 70.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.