Проблема обоснованности позиций сенаторов США в обсуждении размещения системы ПРО «Сейфгард»

Федюшко Дмитрий Игоревич

doi:10.7256/2454-0609.2016.4.15065


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

History magazine - researches

Reference:

Fedyushko D.I. The US Senate Debate on “Safeguard” Missile Defense System: Validity of Opinions Problem // History magazine - researches. 2016. № 4. P. 450-454. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0609.2016.4.15065 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=15065

Проблема обоснованности позиций сенаторов США в обсуждении размещения системы ПРО «Сейфгард»

Fedyushko Dmitrii Igorevich

post-graduate student of the Department of Modern and Contemporary History of European and American Countries, Faculty of History at Lomonosov Moscow State University

125993, Russia, g. Moscow, bul. Tverskoi, 2, of. 207

dmigfe@yandex.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Issues of war and peace"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0609.2016.4.15065

Received:

20-04-2015

Published:

07-10-2016

Abstract: This article discusses validity of opinions during the Senate debate on “Safeguard” missile defense system. The object of this research is senators’ arguments, presented after the decision-making on the problem. The author gives a detailed structure of their arguments and analyzes them. He pays special attention to senators’ statements on the US National Security or “Safeguard” technical characteristics. The author also defines influence of legislators’ arguments on the ideological split regarding the missile defense system. The main methods used in the articles are historical-typological and historical-systematic. The method of historical periodisation was used while reviewing the results of vote on missile defense issue. Research novelty lies in tracing connections between legislators’ argumentation and the ideological split in regards to the missile defense system. The author’s particular contribution to the topic is represented by grouping senators’ arguments into several categories, which allows to expose their position. The article also approaches the problem of party split regarding the missile defense system.

Keywords:

Senate, Voting, Safeguard, Anti-missile defense, Decision, Stance, Cold War, Split, Lawmakers, Survey

References

1. Dexter L. Congressmen and the Making of Military Policy // Readings on Congress. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971. 426 p.
2. Kanter A. Congress and the Defense Budget: 1960-1970 // The American Political Science Review. Vol. 66. No. 1. 1972. PP. 129-143.
3. Pastor R. Congress and the Politics of U.S. Foreign Economic Policy, 1929-1976. L. A.: University of California Press, 1982. 355 p.
4. Halsted T. Lobbying Against ABM, 1967-1970 // Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. Vol. XXVIII. No 4. April 1971. PP> 23-28.
5. Hinkley B. Stability and Change in Congress. N. Y.: Harper & Row, 1972. 323 p.
6. Foreign Relationa of the United States, 1969-1976. Vol. XXXII. SALT I, 1969-1972. Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 2010. 1016 p.
7. Rees C. ABM: A Study of Legislative Decision Making // American Bar Association Journal. Vol. 56. No. 5. May 1970. PP. 475-477.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.