Статья 'Создание литературных объединений писателей Чувашии в 1920-1930-е гг.' - журнал 'Genesis: исторические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

Creation of Literary Associations of Writers of Chuvashia in the 1920s-1930s.

Agaeva Ekaterina Vasil'evna

PhD in History

Associate Professor, Chair of General Disciplines, Chuvash State Agrarian University

428003, Russia, Republic of Chuvashia, Cheboksary, K. Marx str., 29, of. Moskovsky Ave.

agaeva.ek@yandex.ru
Sergeev Tikhon Sergeevich

Doctor of History

Professor, Russian and General History Department, Chuvash State Pedagogical University

428003, Russia, Republic of Chuvashia, Cheboksary, K. Marx str., 38

tikhon-sergeev@yandex.ru
Mikhailova Renata Vasil'evna

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, Head of Chair of General Disciplines, Chuvash State Agrarian University

428003, Russia, Republic of Chuvashia, Cheboksary, K. Marx str., 29

neti-mix@yandex.ru
Tikhonov Anatolii Sergeevich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, Head of Chair of General Disciplines, Chuvash State Agrarian University

428003, Russia, Republic of Chuvashia, Cheboksary, K. Marx str., 29

tihonov.an12@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2022.12.39319

EDN:

YSTAEG

Received:

05-12-2022


Published:

30-12-2022


Abstract: The article examines the process of the origin and development of literary associations of writers of Chuvashia in the period of the 1920s-1930s. The object of research is the literary associations of writers of Chuvashia in the period under consideration. The subject of the study is the formation of creative literary associations of Chuvash writers in the 1920s-1930s. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study was made up of comparative historical, logical methods, as well as a chronological approach. Their application made it possible to reveal the literary and unifying processes in the development and in the context of phenomena occurring both in the whole country and in individual regions. The purpose of the article is to identify the features of the origin and development of literary associations of Chuvash writers as an emerging whole, including some structural elements. In modern Russia, in conditions of spiritual crisis, when interest in the literary works of national writers is declining, it is necessary to use the experience accumulated in the 1920s and 1930s. Over two decades, a galaxy of professional writers has formed in Chuvashia, largely due to the cultural and educational activities of literary associations. The scientific novelty lies in the identification of the specifics and conditions for the creation of literary associations in Chuvashia. Thus, we come to the conclusion that the peculiarities of the origin and development of literary associations of Chuvash writers acted as a becoming whole, which includes moments and stages of formation: 1) groups of Chuvash writers, 2) Chuvash journalism, 3) Chuvash literature with a variety of literary genres.


Keywords:

literary associations, Chuvashia, writers, culture of Chuvashia, national literature, creative intelligentsia, writers' association, writers' union, cultural institutions, socialist realism

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

 A comprehensive study of the professional and social activities of the creative intelligentsia in Russia, comprehension of its role in the development of culture is impossible without an exhaustive development of this topic in individual regions.

Each region or national republic has its own specifics, conditions and ways of forming the intelligentsia. Writers, as representatives of the creative intelligentsia, are the most vivid expression of the national self-awareness of the people. The young Chuvash Autonomous Region, formed in 1920, and received the status of an autonomous republic in 1925, developed both economically and culturally. Cultural institutions and special educational institutions were opened. The growth of periodicals in the Chuvash language required professional specialists - journalists, publicists, critics, etc. Talented young people were able to study at leading universities of the country on vouchers from the republic. It was at educational institutions that the first literary circles appeared, instilling a love of poetry and prose in young people.

The first literary circles were opened in Moscow, Leningrad, Kazan, Samara [1]. It should be noted that the creation of literary associations became a kind of experiment in Soviet Russia. It was necessary to raise the educational level of the population, because 80% were illiterate, as D. S. Moskovskaya and O. V. Romanova noted in their work [13]. Soon similar associations appeared on the territory of Chuvashia: in Cheboksary, Vurnary, Alikov and other settlements. Since Cheboksary was a "quiet city" at that time, the nearby cities where quite a lot of Chuvash students lived became temporary "hotbeds" of new cultural transformations. In 1921, the Chuvash Literary Society was opened in Kazan, at the Empire Red Army Club. At the same time, another circle appeared around the editorial office of the newspaper "Kanash" (Council). These circles published handwritten magazines with short stories and poems by both well-known and novice authors. In 1921, in Simbirsk, the famous Chuvash publicist, poet, ethnographer A. P. Prokopyev-Milli created the "Chuvash Literary Circle". The staff of the newspaper "Sutala" (Light) and students of the Chuvash Teachers' Seminary took an active part in the work of the circle. Two issues of the handwritten magazine "Atal Yurri" (Volga Song) were published jointly. The members of the circle were also engaged in the translation of foreign literature into the Chuvash language, popularization of Chuvash literature among the Russian population [14].Gradually Cheboksary became the center of culture of the Chuvash people, where M. K. Sespel, N. I. Polorussov-Shelebi, N. Ya. Zolotov, S. V. Elger and other literary figures moved from other cities.

On December 18, 1921, the "Society of Lovers of Chuvash Literature and Literature named after N. I. Ashmarin" was established. Initially, this community was formed in the form of a free association, where writers of Chuvashia with different creative approaches to literature could consist. However, without reaching a consensus on the further development of the Chuvash literary language and the Chuvash script, the above-mentioned society split nine months later.

Most writers advocated the reform of the Chuvash language. A. P. Milli, D. P. Petrov-Yuman and some others advocated the preservation of the original Chuvash language, proposed to form Chuvash instead of foreign words [9]In April 1923, a group of writers led by A. P. Milli created the "Chuvash Literary Society". Later, the leader and members of this society: A. P. Milli, D. P. Petrov-Yuman, S. V. Elger, N. T. Vasyanka, N. I. Shelebi and others were accused of adherence to bourgeois-nationalist elements, of abandoning Russian culture and switching to the assimilation of Western culture, which caused the dissolution of the society [15].In June 1923, the Union of Chuvash Writers and Journalists "Kanash" was established, which included about 40 professional journalists, publicists, poets, prose writers. D. S. Elmen, N. Ya. Zolotov, S. V. Elger, N. T. Vasyanka, F. P. Pavlov, N. V. Vasiliev (Shubossini), G. V. Zaitsev (Tal-Mrza) and others spoke about the need to develop Chuvash literature and language, to introduce scientific, international terms [6].

They found their inspiration in the revolutionary events, the civil war, the heroic labor of the workers, etc. Since July 1924, the literary and artistic magazine "Suntal" (Anvil) began to be published by the forces of the association. It should be emphasized that Kanash has done a great job in introducing the masses to education and literature. V. I. Sokolova and V. B. Lastochkin noted in their work that the implementation of some aspects of national policy was carried out through small public formations, to which this union can be attributed [17]. By 1925, about 200 people were in various literary circles.

 

The split that occurred in 1921 in the "Society of Lovers of Chuvash Literature and Literature named after N. I. Ashmarin", on the one hand, led to constant criticism of some writers in excessive nationalism, on the other - contributed to the development of different genres and trends in national literature.The transformation of the Chuvash Autonomous Region into an autonomous republic in April 1925 brought the national culture to a new level.

 

Various newspapers, magazines "Samrak kommunist" ("Young Communist"), "Yalkor" ("Selkor") began to be published. From 1926 to 1929, the number of workers and peasants correspondents at the editorial offices of newspapers and magazines increased from 500 to 1,500. Of these, about 80 people, along with notes, published poems and stories, which indicates a change in literacy. Correspondents usually stood on the side of the new government. R. V. Mikhailova in her work gives examples of how many peasants worried that they would not be classified as "well-off" and wrote about it in the newspapers [11]. There were 22 literary circles and 8 sections on the territory of the republic, in which about 300 young writers, journalists, and laborers were involved [19].

In the mid-1920s there came a turning point in the development of literature. In this case, the fracture is a profound change. The decisions of the XIII Congress of the RCP (b) on the press (1924) and the resolutions of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) "On the party's policy in the field of fiction (1925) became the beginning of total ideological control over literary works. The struggle against bourgeois and counter-revolutionary elements intensified. The emphasis was placed on the education of ideologically correct communist cadres [12]. Party and state figures often spoke to the writers with guiding parting words: S. P. Petrov, V. I. Toksin, A. N. Nikitin. Freedom of creativity began to be restricted, denunciation was welcomed.

The Chuvash Literary Society was closed. M. F. Yuryev, N. V. Shubossini, P. P. Khuzangai and others were accused of creating extra-class works, praising the past.

In June 1927, the Kanash Union was reorganized into the Chuvash Association of Proletarian Writers by analogy with the Russian Association of Proletarian Writers (RAPP), established in 1925. On the one hand, all literary activity became controlled by party structures, but on the other hand, the creative intelligentsia of the republic united again, and the unifying principle was socialist idealism, transformed by 1932 into the style of socialist realism. The second half of the 1920s was a period of rapid growth of the Chuvash national literature. This process was influenced by the meetings of A.M. Gorky, V. V. Mayakovsky with writers of Chuvashia. Some of them subsequently corresponded with famous masters of the word. The works "The Earth Speaks" by V. E. Rzai, "The Daughter of the Storm" by V. O. Alager, "The Village in Plmen" by D. V. Isaev about the events of the revolutionary years, have received popular recognition. There were works for children "Ethnus and Marusya", "In a quiet hut" by M. D. Trubina, "The Cat and the Rooster" by N. I. Shelebi.

Both young talents and experienced masters continued to be sent to educational institutions of the country to improve their professional level [2]. His studies were conducted at the Moscow State University, the Gorky Literary Institute, the State Institute of Journalism, the Moscow Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages, Leningrad State University and others. E. Z. Maden studied at the postgraduate school of the Research Institute of Culture of Oriental Peoples in Leningrad, and N. Ya. Zolotov at the postgraduate school at the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. In 1920-1925, the number of writers with higher education in the republic was about 5%, and by 1935-1940 it was already about 20% [3].

In 1931-1932 . The Central Committee of the CPSU (b) adopted a number of resolutions aimed at complete ideological dictate by the state. In his work S. S. Bakaryagin concludes that "party ideology became the only possible one for broadcasting in all spheres of society" [4]. Literary groups and societies began to be abolished. The Union of Soviet Writers, formed in 1934, became the unifying organization of writers supporting the Soviet government, the structural unit of which was the Union of Writers of Chuvashia.

In June 1934, the First Congress of the Union of Writers of Chuvashia opened. Authoritative writers were elected to the board of this union: A. I. Zolotov, I. S. Maksimov-Koshkinsky, D. D. Danilov, M. F. Danilov-Chaldun. The newly created writers' organization of Chuvashia began to carry out active socio-political work. Its members - writers of Chuvashia regularly held creative meetings with the workers of the republic. The role of the Writers' Union was significant in promoting the publication of books. It is worth emphasizing that the content of these books had to correspond to the dissemination of the theme of the labor of workers and peasants, the achievements of Soviet power. It is important to note that the works of Chuvash writers in the 1930s reached a professional level. This is evidenced by the recognition of the works of Chuvash writers at the All-Union level. Poems by P. P. Khuzangai, Ya. G. Ukhsai, stories by A. F. Talvir and others were translated into Russian. Works of Russian classics were published in the Chuvash language. Poems and stories by Tatar, Udmurt, Mari, and Mordovian authors were published in almanacs and magazines of the republic. These moments, in fact, contributed to the exchange of experience of creative wealth between different regions.

It should be noted that during the period under review, contradictions arose in the writing environment between writers representing different ideological trends [5]. They reflected the installation of the CPSU (b) coming "from above" to constantly monitor deviations towards nationalism and various biases. Within the framework of such a party setup, some representatives of the creative intelligentsia acted to "curry favor" with the board of the Writers' Union, seeking to find lines in the works of colleagues for which the authors could be classified as "enemies of the people". It is also known that sometimes the Writers' Union itself initiated criticism of the work of a particular writer. It is clear that such actions justified the re-aggression that had begun against "enemies of the people" [9, 10]. In the context of what has been said, it is important to note that the label "non-Soviet writer" was already attached to recognized masters. There is a known case when the secretary of the Cheboksary City Party Committee summoned the people's poet of the Chuvash ASSSR S. V. Elger and demanded to purge "enemies of the people" [7].

  In 1937, according to the order of the People's Commissar of Internal Affairs of the USSR, 1800 people were to be repressed in the republic, 300 of them were to be shot [20]. V. E. Mitta, A. I. Zolotov, D. P. Petrov-Yuman, P. P. Khuzangai and others were repressed. Similar processes took place in other regions of the country [16, 18].So, despite the complexity of the historical period of the 1920s-1930s, when contradictory socio-political processes took place, there is no doubt that this period was the time of formation and development of the national Chuvash literature.

We came to the conclusion that the peculiarities of the origin and development of literary associations of Chuvash writers acted as a becoming whole, which includes moments and stages of formation: 1) since the 1920s, literature lovers have been uniting into groups that begin to conduct educational and publishing activities; 2) due to the growth of periodicals in the Chuvash language, Chuvash journalism appears, represented by both professional journalists and various authors of articles from the masses; 3) there is a rapid growth of Chuvash literature with a variety of literary genres, the number of professional writers is growing.

References
1. Agaeva, E. V., Sergeev, T. S., & Mikhailova, R. V. (2021). The problem of training theatrical personnel for Chuvashia in the 20-30s of the XX century. Bulletin of the Chuvash University, 2, 5-10.
2. Agaeva, E. V., Petrov, V. R., & Chernoyarova, M. Yu. (2018). Activities of state and party bodies for the training of creative intelligentsia for the Chuvash Republic in the 1920s-1930s. In Accounting, analysis and audit in the digital economy : Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 444-450). Cheboksary: Chuvash State Agricultural Academy.
3. Agaeva, E.V., & Sergeev, T.S. (2008). Formation of the creative intelligentsia of Chuvashia: problems and searches, 2nd ed., supplement and revision, Cheboksary: Chuvash. state. ped. un-t.
4. Bakaryagin, S. S. (2020). The magazine "Art to the masses" as a source of studying the artistic culture of the USSR at the turn of the 1920s-1930s. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 4(115), 199-204.
5. Goncharenko, A. A. (2020). Institute of Art criticism in the USSR culture system of the 1930s. Culture and Art,6, 38-46.
6. State Archive of Modern History of the Chuvash Republic. F. 2718/434. Op. 2. d. 81. L. 46.
7. State Archive modern history of the Chuvash Republic. F.2718/434. Op.2. d.82. l.9.
8. Emelyanova, T. N. (2021). Some reflections on the origin of the genre system of Chuvash literature. Language and word: Collection of scientific papers. Cheboksary: I.N. Ulyanov Chuvash State University, 107-109.
9. History of modern Chuvashia. Book 1: 1917-1941 (2001). – Cheboksary.
10. Kukushkina, T. A. (2021). "The silent ones have spoken": Serapions at a discussion at the Leningrad branch of the All-Russian Union of Soviet Writers on ideological and creative perestroika (1931) // The Serapion Brothers: A Look from the XXI century: To the 100th anniversary of the Literary Community. K.A. Fedin State Museum, Saratov National Research State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky. – Saratov: IC "Science", 2021. – pp. 58-65.
11. Mikhailova, R.V. (2005). Features of spirituality of the Russian peasantry in the 20-30s of the XX century. Artistic culture of Chuvashia: the 20s of the XX century. Cheboksary: CHGIGN, 106-123.
12. Moskovskaya, D.S. (2021). Proletarian literature as a project. New Literary Review, 5(171), 80-93.
13. Moskovskaya, D. S., & Romanova, O. V. (2021). Literary circles as a tool for building proletarian culture. 1920-1932 (according to the documents of the Department of manuscripts of IMLI RAS). Bulletin of Slavic Cultures, 61,189-198. https://doi.org/10.37816/2073-9567-2021-61-189-198 .
14. Russian State Archive of Literature and Art. F. 1698. Op. 1. D. 1071. L. 5.
15. Sirotkin, M.Ya. (1956). Essay on the history of Chuvash Soviet literature. Cheboksary.
16. Son, Z. (2020). Soviet Culture and Soviet Koreans (1920-1930). Journal of Toegye Studies, 3 (2), 95-111.
17. Sokolova, V. I., & Lastochkin, V. B. (2020). On some aspects of the implementation of the national policy of the Soviet state in the Chuvash ASSR in the 1920s-1930s. Bulletin of the Chuvash University, 2, 150-157.
18. Sokolova, F. H., & Panikar, M. M. (2021). Political repressions against the intelligentsia of the European North of Russia in 1920-1930. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 469, 194-203.
19. Suntal (Anvil). 1930. No. 7-8. p.4. (in Chuvash)
20. Soviet Chuvashia. 2005. 29 Apr.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

REVIEW of the article The history of the creation of creative organizations of writers of Chuvashia in the 1920s-1930s. The title partly corresponds to the content of the article materials. The title of the article conditionally looks at the scientific problem, which the author's research is aimed at solving. The reviewed article is of relative scientific interest. The author did not explain the choice of the research topic and did not justify its relevance. The article does not formulate the purpose of the study, does not specify the object and subject of the study, the methods used by the author. In the reviewer's opinion, the main elements of the "program" of the study were not fully thought out by the author, which affected its results. The author did not present the results of the analysis of the historiography of the problem and did not formulate the novelty of the undertaken research, which is a significant disadvantage of the article. In presenting the material, the author selectively demonstrated the results of the analysis of the historiography of the problem in the form of links to relevant works on the research topic. There is no appeal to opponents in the article. The author did not explain the choice and did not characterize the range of sources involved in the disclosure of the topic. The author did not explain or justify the choice of the chronological and geographical framework of the study. In the opinion of the reviewer, the author sought to use sources competently, maintain a scientific style of presentation, competently use methods of scientific knowledge, observe the principles of logic, systematicity and consistency of presentation of the material. As an introduction, the author said that "the revolutionary events of 1917 gave an impetus to the development of Chuvash literature": "talented young people from Chuvashia, who had the opportunity to study at universities in the country, began to unite in creative circles." In the main part of the article, the author, first of all, listed a number of creative organizations that arose in the early 1920s, said that they had established the production of periodicals. Then the author explained why Cheboksary was "gradually becoming the center of culture of the Chuvash people, said that in 1923 the Chuvash Literary Society was created and suddenly noticed that some of its members "were later accused of adherence to bourgeois-nationalist elements," etc. The author continued a fragmentary presentation of the facts of history (it is unclear why exactly the "creation"?) creative organizations: he told that in 1923 the Union of Chuvash Writers and Journalists "Kanash", etc., arose, unexpectedly stated again that "the split among Chuvash writers had positive aspects, because it contributed to the development of different genres and trends in national literature", justified the idea that "the transformation of the Chuvash Autonomous Region into an autonomous republic in April 1925 brought national culture to a new level." Further, the author informed the reader that "in the mid-1920s, a turning point in the development of " etc., that "freedom of creativity began to be limited, informing was welcomed," etc., that "in June 1927, the Union Kanash was reorganized into the Chuvash Association of Proletarian Writers by analogy with the Russian Association of Proletarian Writers (RAPP), established in 1925,"and that "the unifying principle was socialist idealism, transformed by 1932 into the style of socialist realism." In the following stories, the author drew attention to the fact that "both young talents and experienced masters continued to be sent to educational institutions of the country to improve their professional level," etc., that "in 1931-1932. The Central Committee of the CPSU(b) adopted a number of resolutions aimed at complete ideological dictate on the part of the state,"etc., that "contradictions between representatives of different ideological trends grew in the writing environment," etc., and that writers, along with other citizens of the USSR, were subjected to repression. The author's conclusions are generalizing. The conclusions allow us to evaluate the scientific achievements of the author in the framework of his research in part. The conclusions do not reflect the results of the research conducted by the author in full. In the final paragraph of the article, the author reported that "the 1920s and 1930s were the period of formation and development of Chuvash literature," etc. The author unexpectedly summarized that "despite the ideological dictate, the traditions laid down by the classics of Chuvash literature have been preserved." The conclusions, in the opinion of the reviewer, do not clarify the purpose of the study. In the reviewer's opinion, the potential purpose of the study has been partially achieved by the author. The publication may arouse the interest of the magazine's audience. The article requires significant revision, first of all, in terms of formulating the key elements of the research program and their corresponding conclusions.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

It is known that Russian culture has always been characterized by literary centrism, and therefore the importance of writers and poets for the formation of public opinion was extremely high. Let us recall here only such luminaries as A.S. Pushkin, M.Y. Lermontov, L.N. Tolstoy, etc. However, national literatures were no less important for the formation of their ethnic groups, which in a number of cases began their formation in the XX century and, especially, after the revolution of 1917. In this regard, it is of interest to study various aspects of the formation of national literary schools in the history of Russia in the XX century. These circumstances determine the relevance of the article submitted for review, the subject of which is the creation of literary associations of writers of Chuvashia in the 1920s and 1930s. The author sets out to analyze the history of literary associations of Chuvashia, to show the contradictions between writers representing different ideological trends, as well as to get ahead of the contribution of this period to the formation of Chuvash national literature. The work is based on the principles of analysis and synthesis, reliability, objectivity, the methodological basis of the research is a systematic approach, which is based on the consideration of the object as an integral complex of interrelated elements. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the topic: the author seeks to characterize the initial stage of the formation of Chuvash national literary associations. Scientific novelty is also determined by the involvement of archival materials. Considering the bibliographic list of the article as a positive point, its scale and versatility should be noted: in total, the list of references includes up to 20 different sources and studies. The source base of the article is represented by published materials (periodicals) and documents from the collections of the State Archive of Modern History of the Chuvash Republic and the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art. Among the studies used, we note the works of E.V. Agaeva and T.S. Sergeev, T.N. Yemelyanova and other authors, whose focus is on various aspects of the history of Chuvash literature. Note that the bibliography is important both from a scientific and educational point of view: after reading the text of the article, readers can turn to other materials on its topic. In general, in our opinion, the integrated use of various sources and research contributed to the solution of the tasks facing the author. The style of writing the article can be attributed to a scientific one, at the same time understandable not only to specialists, but also to a wide readership, to anyone interested in both the history of Chuvash culture in general and Chuvash literature in particular. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the collected information received by the author during the work on the topic of the article. The structure of the work is characterized by a certain logic and consistency, it can be distinguished by an introduction, the main part, and conclusion. At the beginning, the author defines the relevance of the topic, shows that "the study of the professional and social activities of the creative intelligentsia in Russia, understanding its role in the development of culture is impossible without an exhaustive development of this topic in individual regions." The author shows the gradual formation of the national Chuvash literature, which begins to develop quite quickly from neighboring regions (Kazan) in Cheboksary. Within the framework of the study, several important conclusions are made: "1) since the 1920s, literature lovers have been uniting into groups that begin to conduct educational and publishing activities; 2) due to the growth of periodicals in the Chuvash language, Chuvash journalism appears, represented by both professional journalists and various authors of articles from the masses; 3) there is a rapid growth of Chuvash literature with a variety of literary genres, and the number of professional writers is growing." The main conclusion of the article is that "the period of the 1920s-1930s became the time of formation and development of national Chuvash literature." The article submitted for review is devoted to an urgent topic, will arouse readers' interest, and its materials can be used both in lecture courses on the history of Russia and in various special courses. In general, in our opinion, the article can be recommended for publication in the journal Genesis: Historical Research.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.