Статья 'Историко-мемориальная деятельность Россотрудничества за рубежом: результаты, проблемы, перспективы' - журнал 'Genesis: исторические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

Historical and Memorial Activities of Rossotrudnichestvo Abroad: Results, Problems, and Prospects

Filimonova Kseniia Nikolaevna

ORCID: 0000-0001-7602-1412

PhD student of the Russian History Department of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

117198, Russia, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6

fili-ksu@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2023.11.39284

EDN:

YFIKBZ

Received:

29-11-2022


Published:

08-12-2023


Abstract: The subject of the research is the historical and memorial activities abroad of the Federal Agency Rossotrudnichestvo as one of the instruments of diplomacy of the heritage of the Russian Federation. The author examines the work of the Agency for the period 2010-2022 in the field of preservation and maintenance of civilian burials and memorial sites, which are associated with the names of our compatriots - Russian and Soviet military and statesmen, cultural and scientific figures. One of the goals of memorial policy is to consolidate Russian compatriots abroad and help preserve their national identity and ties with their homeland. The study uses a systematic approach, which allows to analyze the problem from different points of view: historical, cultural and legal, as well as methods of analysis and synthesis. It is important to note that in the conditions of a difficult geopolitical situation the Rossotrudnichestvo has carried out a considerable amount of work to locate, maintain an inventory of burial sites of historical and memorial importance to Russia and to promote the historical memory of prominent Russian compatriots abroad. However, this area of activity requires additional funds and efforts, in particular: searching for new sources of financing major restoration work, improving mechanisms for the maintenance of graves, more thorough elaboration of measures to promote the memory of the "Russian abroad" and active interaction with the Russian and international expert community, non-profit organizations and associations of compatriots abroad.


Keywords:

humanitarian policy, heritage diplomacy, historical and cultural heritage, historical and memorial activities, historical memory, burial site, soft power, Russia, Rossotrudnichestvo, compatriots

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

The author expresses gratitude and deep appreciation to the scientific supervisor, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor M.N. Moseikina, and the federal agency Rossotrudnichestvo for valuable advice and comments while working on this article.

 

Historical and cultural heritage has always been an important tool of Russia's foreign policy, contributing to the formation and strengthening of a positive image of the country in the world and contributing to an understanding of its historical development, role and place in world history. Therefore, preserving the memory of the historical heritage of our compatriots abroad becomes a priority task of the state in the context of spreading the "culture of abolition" of all Russian in the politics of some states and the demolition of Soviet monuments dedicated to the events of World War II.

The issues of cultural diplomacy and the use of historical heritage and places of memory as a resource of "soft power" in the foreign policy of states were considered both by foreign (P. Nora [1], J. Nye [2], A. Assman [3, 4], H. Rius Uldemolins [5], etc.) and Russian researchers (O. S. Porshneva [6], V. F. Ershov [7], D. A. Zvyagina [8], M. M. Lebedeva [9], etc.).

The subject of this study is the historical and memorial activities abroad of the Federal Agency for the Commonwealth of Independent States, Compatriots Living Abroad and International Humanitarian Cooperation (Rossotrudnichestvo) as one of the tools of diplomacy of Russia's heritage. In his research, the author used a systematic approach, analyzing the problem from different points of view: historical, cultural and legal, as well as methods of analysis and synthesis.

Cultural and humanitarian diplomacy, which "manifests itself in the foreign information, socio-cultural space through the activities of information and cultural centers and other related institutions abroad," plays an important role "in expanding and strengthening the space of the Russian language and culture" [10, p. 66].

The need to develop international cooperation in the field of preservation, restoration and protection of cultural values is stated in the Concept of Humanitarian Policy of the Russian Federation Abroad approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 09/05/2022 No. 611. In the context of the current geopolitical moment, it sets the task of preserving Russia's participation in the system of European cultural interaction and expanding cultural ties with the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America.

In relation to the history of international cooperation in the field of humanitarian relations, modern historiography uses the concept of "heritage diplomacy", which T. Winter characterizes as "a set of processes as a result of which the cultural and natural past, shared between countries and between states, becomes the subject of exchange, cooperation and forms of joint management" [11, p. 1007].

An important part of Rossotrudnichestvo's activities is historical and memorial activities abroad. On the territory of modern foreign countries there are a large number of graves and memorials that are associated with the names of our compatriots – Russian and Soviet military and government figures, cultural and scientific figures. Since 2010, the Agency has been carrying out work on the maintenance and preservation of memorial cemeteries abroad, individual plots in common cemeteries and individual graves and other types of graves, with the exception of burial sites classified as military and new graves.

In its activities, the Agency is guided by a series of regulatory legal acts, among them: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 09/06/2008 No. 1315 "On Certain Issues of Public Administration in the field of International Cooperation" and the regulations approved by him on the Federal Agency for the Commonwealth of Independent States, Compatriots Living Abroad, and International Humanitarian Cooperation;  Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 05/31/2010 No. 379 "On Approval of the Rules for the Organization of Work on the Maintenance and Preservation of Burial Sites located Abroad that have Historical and Memorial significance for the Russian Federation"; Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 11.11.2010 No. 1948-r "On approval of the List of burial sites located Abroad that have historical significance for the Russian Federation-memorial significance"; order of Rossotrudnichestvo dated 06/02/2014 No. 0098-pr "On the Procedure for organizing and carrying out work on maintaining and preserving burial sites located abroad that have historical and memorial significance for the Russian Federation", etc.

Rossotrudnichestvo and its representative offices abroad (Russian Houses), together with the Government Commission for Compatriots Abroad (PCDSR), regularly updates the list of burial sites located there that have historical and memorial significance for the Russian Federation. The main selection criteria are: the historical significance of the contribution of the buried persons to science, culture, art, and the spiritual life of Russia and the states where the burial sites are located, and to the strengthening of bilateral relations.

To find and identify such burial sites, Rossotrudnichestvo and its foreign missions cooperate with volunteer and youth organizations, associations of compatriots abroad, as well as with the Russian and international expert community, including the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, the Federal Archival Agency (Rosarchiv), the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IRI RAS), the Russian The D.S. Likhachev Scientific Research Institute of Cultural and Natural Heritage, the Alexander Solzhenitsyn House of the Russian Diaspora.

After the last update in 2020, the government List includes more than 90 graves located on the territory of 14 states (Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, Egypt, Italy, Macedonia, Morocco, the Netherlands, Poland, Serbia, Tunisia, Turkey, the Czech Republic and France). It should be noted that the List includes not only individual burials, but also entire "Russian" sections of cemeteries. Thus, the Russian sector of the city cemetery of Saint-Genevieve-de-Bois (France) has more than 5.5 thousand.  Russian graves, where famous personalities are buried (among them: ballet dancer Rudolf Nureyev, writer Ivan Bunin and film director Andrei Tarkovsky). There is also a single complex of historical and memorial monuments "Russian Necropolis" on the territory of the New Cemetery in Belgrade (Serbia), where representatives of the first and second waves of emigration are buried.

In order to preserve these burial sites, Russian homes abroad organize work on the installation and repair of tombstones, restoration work, pay for services in preparing initial permits and estimates, technical specifications in compliance with the requirements of the legislation of the country where the burial sites are located, as well as for the maintenance of burial sites in proper condition, including land lease.

Russian grave restoration works were carried out on the graves of architect N.V. Sultanov, M. Georgievsky, M.P. Posen, Prince Shakhovsky at the Russian Orthodox cemetery in the period 2013-2016 by the representative office of Rossotrudnichestvo in Germany together with the Berlin 09 Society, the Abert Herrmann & S?hne GmbH society and the German Cultural Society of Baden-Baden. grave grave of Prince I.S. Vasilchikov in the cemetery of Baden-Baden, graves of V.D. Nabokov, N.P. Bogdanov-Belsky, M.O. Eisenstein, A.V. Krivoshein in the Russian Orthodox cemetery in Berlin. Russian Russian Necropolis complex burial and restoration works were completed in July 2014 at the New Cemetery in Belgrade, which took place in several stages with the support of Gazprom Neft and a specially created non-profit organization Foundation for the Maintenance, Restoration and Preservation of the Complex of Historical and Memorial Monuments "Russian Necropolis in Belgrade". In January 2021, the restoration of monuments on the graves of the artist K. Bryullov and Princess M. Obolenskaya at the non-Catholic historical cemetery "Testaccio" in Rome came to an end.

Financing of the work on maintaining the graves in proper condition is mainly due to funds received by Russian houses from authorized activities. Since 2019, it has become possible to receive budget allocations for the organization of work on the restoration and preservation of civil graves abroad (Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 739 dated June 7, 2019 "On Amendments to the Rules for the Organization of Work on the Maintenance and Preservation of Burial Sites located Abroad that have historical and Memorial Significance for the Russian Federation"). It should be noted that the limited resources of Rossotrudnichestvo's representative offices and the complexity of the procedure for obtaining funds from the federal budget of Russia make it difficult to carry out large-scale restoration work, which a number of burials need. Rossotrudnichestvo's offices mainly carry out measures to maintain graves, including cleaning tombstones, partial restoration of inscriptions on steles, garbage collection and landscaping.

Large-scale restoration work of graves and "Russian" necropolises abroad in isolated cases is carried out at the expense of funds raised by funds. So, in 2008, with the assistance of the International Public Foundation for the Promotion of the Spiritual and Moral Revival of Modern Society, the Foundation of the Apostle Andrew the First-Called restored a memorial to 342 Russians who died in 1921 during the stay of the army of General P.N. Wrangel on the Gallipoli Peninsula in Turkey. Russian Russian Heritage Foundation, in turn, in 2021 paid the debts for the lease and maintenance of 37 graves in the "Russian" necropolis of the New Cemetery of Belgrade, and in 2022 financed the repair of the burial of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Empire (1906-1910) A.P. Izvolsky and artists M.F. Larionov and N.S. Goncharova in France. However, such interaction between Rossotrudnichestvo and partner organizations is non-systemic in nature.

In addition, Rossotrudnichestvo and its representative offices pay attention to measures to popularize the Russian historical and memorial heritage abroad, preserve the historical memory of the exploits of our great compatriots, including through the creation of memorial routes, organization of work with the expert community, support and preservation of the Russian language abroad.

One of the goals of Rossotrudnichestvo's memorial policy is to consolidate Russian compatriots abroad, promote the preservation of their national identity and ties with their homeland. Thus, in order to preserve and maintain in proper condition other Russian graves at the Testaccio cemetery in Italy, in 2015, for the first time, the potential of the volunteer movement was actively used. The involvement of the RIM youth association in practical work on the preservation of the Russian historical and memorial heritage is of great historical, patriotic and educational importance.

            In recent years, Rossotrudnichestvo has carried out a lot of work on the search, inventory and preservation of burial sites of historical and memorial significance for Russia and the popularization of historical memory of Russian compatriots abroad. At the same time, it should be recognized that this area of activity of Rossotrudnichestvo requires additional funds and efforts.

            Firstly, a systematic approach to the issue of including new burial sites in the List is important. It is advisable to create expert councils based on the Agency and Russian Houses with the participation of representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, embassies and consulates, historians and art historians who could assess the contribution of our compatriots buried in different countries; after which, on a regular basis, to select burials.  

Secondly, the issue of financing mechanisms for major restoration and restoration works needs to be worked out. To carry out this type of events, it is optimal to use public-private partnership tools based on the best practices implemented both in Russia (for example, in the Kaluga, Moscow, Tula regions) and abroad. With such cooperation, the state performs administrative and supervisory functions, and the private partner performs executive functions [12, p. 137]. In this regard, it is important to develop mechanisms for interaction with foundations and partner organizations, in particular with the Russian Diaspora Heritage Foundation and the St. Andrew the First-Called Foundation, in order to develop cooperation on a systematic basis.

Thirdly, it is necessary to develop action protocols for the Agency's representative offices that guarantee the safety of burials after the completion of a comprehensive restoration and take into account the norms of the legislation of the countries where the burial sites are located.

Finally, it is important to improve the tools for popularizing historical memory of the Russian diaspora, for which to develop cultural and educational programs (in offline and online formats) together with the scientific community for both local residents and compatriots of different ages.

References
1. Nora, P., Ozouf, M., De Puymège, G., & Winock, М. (1999). Франция-память [France-memory]. Saint Petersburg, Russia: Saint Petersburg State University's Publishing House.
2. Nye, J. (2014). The Future of Power. Moscow, Russia: AST.
3. Assmann, A. (2014). Длинная тень прошлого: мемориальная культура и историческая политика [The Long Shadow of the Past. Remembrance culture and politics of history]. Moscow, Russia: New Literary Observer.
4. Assmann, A. (2019). Забвение истории – одержимость историей [Forgetting history-obsession with history]. Moscow, Russia: New Literary Observer.
5. Zamorano, M. M, Rius Ulldemolins, J. (2016). ¿La diplomacia cultural, una política de Estado? Articulación y descoordinación intergubernamental en la acción cultural exterior del Estado español [Cultural diplomacy, a State policy? Intergovernmental articulation and lack of coordination in the external cultural action of the Spanish State]. Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals [Journal of Regional and Federal Studies], 24, 115–154. doi:10.2436/20.8080.01.11
6. Porshneva, O. S. (2021). The Politics of Russian Memory: The Great War in the European Context. RUDN Journal Of Russian History, 20(2), 216-235. doi:10.22363/2312-8674-2021-20-2-216-235
7. Ershov, V. F., & Gadzhieva, K. K. (2018). Russian community in Spain and cultural dialogue (1991-2015). RUDN Journal Of Russian History, 17(1), 92-108. doi:10.22363/2312-8674-2018-17-1-92-108
8. Zvyagina, D. A. (2012). Cultural influence as component of “soft power”. Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики [Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art criticism. Issues of theory and practice], 11–2, 94–98. Retrieved from https://www.gramota.net/materials/3/2012/11-2/22.html
9. Lebedeva, M. M. (2017). Soft power: the concept and approaches. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 3(54), 212-223. doi:10.24833/2071-8160-2017-3-54-212-223
10. Moseykina, M. N. (2015). Diaspora Diplomacy of Russia in Latin America: Historical Experience and Prospects. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 15(4), 66-75. Retrieved from https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/10497
11. Winter T. (2015). Heritage Diplomacy. International Journal of Heritage Studie, 21(10), 997–1015. doi:10.1080/13527258.2015.1041412
12. Rusinova, N. S. (2021). Public-private partnership in the sphere of preservation and development of monuments of cultural heritage. In Фотинские чтения – 2021 (весеннее собрание): материалы VIII Международной научно-практической конференции [Fotin readings – 2021 (spring meeting). Proceedings of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference] (pp.134-139). Izhevsk: Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University's Publishing House.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

for the article Historical and memorial activities of Rossotrudnichestvo abroad: results, problems, prospects, the title partly corresponds to the content of the materials of the article. The title of the article reveals a scientific problem, which the author's research is aimed at solving. The reviewed article is of relative scientific interest. The author explained the choice of the research topic and outlined its relevance. The article does not formulate the purpose of the study, but indicates the subject of the study ("The subject of this study is the historical and memorial activities abroad of the Federal Agency for the Commonwealth of Independent States, Compatriots Living Abroad and International Humanitarian Cooperation (Rossotrudnichestvo) as one of the tools of diplomacy of Russia's heritage"), the methods used by the author. The author outlined the results of the analysis of the historiography of the problem and did not formulate the novelty of the undertaken research, which is a significant drawback of the article. In presenting the material, the author selectively demonstrated the results of the analysis of the historiography of the problem in the form of links to relevant works on the research topic. There is no appeal to opponents in the article. The author did not explain the choice and did not characterize the range of sources involved in the disclosure of the topic. In the opinion of the reviewer, the author sought to use the sources competently, to maintain the scientific style of presentation, to use the methods of scientific knowledge competently, to observe the principles of logic, systematicity and consistency of the presentation of the material. As an introduction, the author expressed gratitude to the scientific supervisor and the federal agency Rossotrudnichestvo for their help, pointed out the reason for choosing the research topic, outlined its relevance and the results of the analysis of the historiography of the problem. In the main part of the article, the author explained to the reader that "the need to develop international cooperation in the field of preservation, restoration and protection of cultural values is stated in the Concept of Humanitarian Policy of the Russian Federation Abroad approved by Presidential Decree No. 611 dated 09/05/2022," etc., that "an important part of Rossotrudnichestvo's activities is historical and memorial activities abroad," etc. The author listed the key regulations governing the Agency's activities, said that "Rossotrudnichestvo and its representative offices abroad (Russian Houses), together with the Government Commission for Compatriots Abroad (PCDSR), regularly updates the list of burial sites located there that have historical and memorial significance for the Russian Federation," etc. Then the author reported that "in order to search for and identify such burial sites, Rossotrudnichestvo and its foreign missions interact with volunteer and youth organizations, associations of compatriots abroad, as well as with the Russian and international expert community," etc., and that "after the last update in 2020, the government List includes more than 90 graves located on the territory of 14 states" He listed the areas of special activity, gave examples of it. Russian russians explained that "the financing of work to maintain burials in proper condition is mainly carried out at the expense of funds received by Russian houses from authorized activities," etc., that "major restoration works of burials and "Russian" necropolises abroad in isolated cases are carried out at the expense of funds raised by funds," etc. At the end of the main part of the article, the author stated that "Rossotrudnichestvo and its representative offices pay attention to measures to popularize the Russian historical and memorial heritage abroad, preserve the historical memory of the exploits of our great compatriots," etc., and that "one of the goals of Rossotrudnichestvo's memorial policy is to consolidate Russian compatriots abroad, promote the preservation of their national identity and ties with the motherland" etc. Why the author limited his efforts to researching the Agency's activities "for the maintenance and preservation of memorial cemeteries abroad, individual plots in common cemeteries and individual graves and other types of burials" remains unclear. There are minor typos in the article, such as: "inventory preservation". The author's conclusions are generalizing and clearly formulated. The conclusions allow us to evaluate the scientific achievements of the author within the framework of his research only partially. In the final paragraphs of the article, the author stated that Rossotrudnichestvo "has done a lot of work on the search, inventory and preservation of burial sites of historical and memorial significance," etc., pointing out that "a systematic approach to the issue of including new burial sites in the List is important," "it is advisable to create expert councils based on the Agency and Russian houses with the participation of representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, embassies and consulates, historians and art historians,"etc., that "the issue of financing mechanisms for major restoration and restoration works needs to be worked out," etc., "it is important to develop mechanisms for interaction with foundations and partner organizations," etc., that "it is necessary to develop action protocols for Agency representative offices, guaranteeing the safety of burials after the completion of a comprehensive restoration and taking into account the norms of the legislation of the countries where the burial sites are located." The author summarized that "it is important to improve the tools for popularizing historical memory of the Russian diaspora, for which to develop cultural and educational programs (in offline and online formats) together with the scientific community," etc. The final paragraphs of the article, in the opinion of the reviewer, do not clarify the purpose of the study. In the reviewer's opinion, the potential purpose of the study has been partially achieved by the author. The publication may arouse the interest of the magazine's audience. The article needs to be finalized, first of all, in terms of formulating the key elements of the research program and their corresponding conclusions.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.