|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Innovative entrepreneurship as a unrealized prospect of Russia’s politics during reform period of the late XX century
Moiseeva Liubov Andreevna
Doctor of History
Professor, the department of Humanitarian Disciplines, Far Eastern State Academy of Art
690000, Russia, Vladivostok, Petra Velikogo Street 3a
|
03lubov47@gmail.com
|
|
 |
Другие публикации этого автора |
|
Abstract. The subject of this research is the innovative entrepreneurship as a factor of transition towards the innovative economy – the unrealized opportunities of the Russian reform period in the late XX century. Based on the modern historical knowledge, the article examines the theory of innovative entrepreneurship of the foreign and Russian scholars from metaphysical to contemporary behavioristic and psychosocial. The author describes the three “waves” in development of the theory of innovative functions of entrepreneurs reflected in a number of aspects of the conceptual constructs of the representatives of Austrian, German, French, and Dutch schools. The article demonstrates the specificity of theories of the Russian scholars that depicts the rapid formation of the new Russian entrepreneurship that is forced to lean not upon the national entrepreneurial culture, values and traditions, but interact with the business world of a foreign culture. The scientific novelty lies in revealing the structural-functional nature of the modern Russian entrepreneurship alongside the new unrealized functions of the state, which led to the large and dangerous historical delay that resulted in preservation of the technological backwardness and collapse of economy. At the same time, the scientific and technological innovations possess the specific functions: disrupting the ever-aging technological stability of production, they generate the structural shifts that allow defining the innovations as a factor of self-development of the entrepreneurial system. The author introduces the model of innovation development of economic system, the main conditions of which are the all-round promotion of innovation and experimentation at all levels and all departments of the corporation; establishment of a specific creative atmosphere; orientation of all innovation activity towards the social needs and national security.
Keywords:
Reform, Promotion, Methodology, Historical knowledge, Theory, Technological backwardness, New functions, Russian Federation, Entrepreneurship, Innovations
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2017.10.23940
Article was received:
06-09-2017
Review date:
02-09-2017
Publish date:
14-11-2017
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian
here
.
References
1.
|
Auktsionek S.P., Belyanova E.V. Sovremennyi etap teorii dlinnykh voln // Dolgovremennye tendentsii v kapitalisticheskom proizvodstve. – M., 1985. – s. 31-47.
|
2.
|
Babintsev V.S., Blinov V.M. Dlinnye volny ekonomicheskoi kon''yunktury i ikh vliyanie na innovatsionnuyu vospriimchivost' proizvodstva. – M., 1991. – 312s.
|
3.
|
Glaz'ev S.Yu. Teoriya dolgosrochnogo tekhniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. – M., 1993. – 377s.
|
4.
|
Glaz'ev S.Yu., Mikerin G.I., Teslya P.N. Dlinnye volny: nauchno-tekhnicheskii progress i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie. – Novosibirsk, 1991.
|
5.
|
Goskomstat Rossii dokladyvaet itogi Vserossiiskoi perepisi naseleniya 2002g. // Rossiiskaya gazeta, 2003. 3, 4 noyabrya.
|
6.
|
Gumilev L.N. Etnosfera: istoriya lyudei i istoriya prirody. – M.: Ekopros, 1993. – 387s.
|
7.
|
Dal' V.I. Tolkovyi slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka. V 4-kh t. T.3. – M.: Terra, 1995.
|
8.
|
Kompleksnaya programma razvitiya i gosudarstvennoi podderzhki innovatsionnogo predprinimatel'stva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 1994-1996gg. / Byuro mezhvedomstvennoi koordinatsionnoi komissii po nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politike. – M., 1994.
|
9.
|
Kondrat'ev N.D. Problemy ekonomicheskoi dialektiki. – M., 1989. – 280s.
|
10.
|
Medynskii V.G. Sharshukova L.G. Innovatsionnoe predprinimatel'stvo. – M.: INFRA, 1997. – 307s.
|
11.
|
Modin A. Organizatsionnye funktsii gosudarstva v protsesse dvizheniya k rynochnoi ekonomike // Voprosy ekonomiki, 1999.-№1.
|
12.
|
Moiseeva L.A. Istoriya formirovaniya predprinimatel'stva na Dal'nem Vostoke kak innovatsionnoi modeli khozyaistvovaniya (1985-2000gg.) – Vladivostok: Dal'nauka, 2003. – 455s.
|
13.
|
Put' v XXI vek: strategicheskie problemy i perspektivy rossiiskoi ekonomiki / rukovod. avtor. koll. D.S.L'vov. – M., 1999.
|
14.
|
Sm.: Predprinimatel'stvo v kontse KhKhv. – M.: Nauka, 1992. – 312s.
|
15.
|
Shumpeter J. Can Capitalism survive? New-York: Harper & Row. 1952. – P.72.
|
16.
|
Cantilion R. Essai sur la nature du commerce en general / Ed an transi. By H. Higgs L., 1931. – P.53-58.
|
17.
|
Sm. po: Knight F.H. Risk, uncertainaty and profit. N.Y., 1921. – 310p.
|
18.
|
Shakil G.L.S. The nature of economic thought. Cambridge (Mass), 1966. – 173p.
|
19.
|
Mises L., von Human action: A treatise on economics, New Haven (conn), 1949. – 249p.
|
20.
|
Hayek F.A. New studies in philosophy, politics, economies and the history of ideas. L., 1978. – 180p.
|
21.
|
Kirzner L.M. Perception opportunity and profit: Studies in the theory of intrepreneurship. Chicago, 1979. – 115p.
|
22.
|
Marchetti C. Society as a learning System: Discovery, Invention and Innovation Cycles Revisited // Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1980. V18.NII.
|
23.
|
Drucker Peter F. Managing for results. London; Sydney. 1992. P. 33.
|
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|