Статья 'Проблемы и перспективы Европейского Союза: экономические аспекты' - журнал 'Финансы и управление' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Finance and Management
Reference:

Problems and prospects of the European Union: economic aspects

Hasanov Javid

Postgraduate student, Academy of Labor and Social Relations

119454, Russia, Moscow, Lobachevsky str., 90

hasanov.javid@outlook.com

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7802.2023.3.44011

EDN:

ZERUWY

Received:

12-09-2023


Published:

05-10-2023


Abstract: This article analyzes the economic aspects currently faced by the European Union. The author resorts to studying this issue through the prism of several important categories, such as the functioning of the single market, the role of the eurozone, the impact of globalization and digital transformation on the economy, as well as issues of sustainable development. A variety of general scientific methods are used for analysis, including analysis and synthesis, as well as logical and comparative descriptive approaches. This allows the author to gain a deeper understanding of the economic situation of the European Union and identify potential solutions to these problems. The analysis of this article leads to the conclusion that the prospects for the economic development of the European Union are closely related to its level of integration within the Union, its ability to adapt to the processes of globalization and successfully solve both internal and external challenges. Despite significant achievements, such as the creation of the single market and the eurozone, there are still imbalances and vulnerabilities within them that pose serious obstacles to the long-term stability and functioning of the Union. A key factor in determining the future economic trajectory of the EU will be its ability to solve these complex problems and promote innovation and sustainable development. In the modern world, strategic planning and effective management are becoming even more important for preserving and strengthening the position of the European Union in the global economic arena.


Keywords:

European Union, single market, eurozone, globalization, digitalization, sustainable development, innovations, Green Course, Horizon Europe, financial crisis

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

The EU is a unique model of economic integration that can serve as a lesson to researchers and policy makers in other regions of the world seeking similar forms of cooperation. It faces a number of serious domestic economic problems, the understanding of which and the ways to solve them is important for global markets and economic actors. [1, c. 41]

The creation of the single market has become the most important achievement in the economic history of the EU and has brought numerous benefits to the EU member states. First of all, the abolition of tariffs and non-tariff barriers contributed to the development of trade within the EU, which led to economies of scale and increased access of enterprises to markets. This contributed to the development of healthy competition, stimulating innovation and improving the quality of products and services. In addition, the free movement of labor contributed to the creation of cross-border jobs, which allowed for a more efficient distribution of skilled personnel and labor among EU member States.

However, the single market is not without difficulties. A. Di Gregorio emphasizes that one of the main problems is the continuing discrepancy in regulatory regulation between the participating countries. [2] Differences in standards, licensing requirements and bureaucratic procedures may hinder the smooth operation of the market. As B. Voltolini, M. Natorski and K. Hay note, enterprises often face problems arising from these differences, especially in industries that are largely regulated at the national level. [3] In addition, the single market has exacerbated the need to develop a unified approach to issues such as consumer protection, environmental standards and digital rights.

The single market continues to face challenges that require careful consideration. The digital age has created new complexities that require standardized rules for data protection, e-commerce, and intellectual property rights. The growth of non-tariff barriers, including technical standards and regulatory obstacles, requires increased attention to harmonization issues. In addition, Brexit has introduced new aspects, affecting trade flows and supply chains, emphasizing the interconnectedness of the Single Market.

In order to improve the efficiency of the single market, the EU should prioritize the convergence of the regulatory framework in order to ensure a level playing field for business and increase consumer confidence. Increased investment in digital infrastructure and innovation will allow the EU to use the potential of the digital economy. In addition, the focus on sustainable development within the single market can contribute to achieving the EU's climate goals, as well as creating new economic opportunities.

The creation of the Eurozone was conceived with the aim of strengthening economic stability by eliminating currency fluctuations and reducing transaction costs within the participating countries. The common currency facilitates cross-border trade and investment, promotes price transparency and enhances the EU's global economic influence. It also simplifies travel and trade for citizens and businesses, which is in line with the broader goals of unity and integration within the EU. Nevertheless, this monetary union, while promising the benefits of stability and efficiency, poses complex challenges that require careful analysis. [4, c. 1241]

During the 2008 financial crisis, the Eurozone faced serious problems. The crisis revealed such vulnerabilities as differences in fiscal policy, uneven economic structure and inadequate anti-crisis management mechanisms. Countries faced difficulties in devaluing their currencies to regain competitiveness because they shared the euro. The crisis highlighted the need for a more comprehensive approach to the coordination of fiscal, monetary and regulatory policies.

The sovereign debt crisis that followed the financial crisis highlighted the problem of fiscal discipline in the Eurozone. Some participating countries have accumulated unsustainable levels of debt, which has raised concerns about the stability of the euro. The subsequent implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact and the Fiscal Compact was aimed at tightening fiscal rules obliging the participating countries to keep the budget deficit and debt levels within certain limits. However, the application of these rules has been criticized for rigidity and lack of flexibility. [5, c. 53]

In order to strengthen the Eurozone, the EU's prospects increasingly emphasize the need for reforms. Initiatives such as the Banking Union, which includes a Single Supervisory Mechanism and a Single Settlement Mechanism, are aimed at creating a unified system of banking supervision and crisis management. In addition, the issue of creating a Eurozone budget that could help stabilize the situation in the participating countries during economic downturns is being increasingly discussed. [6, c. 145]

D. Howarth and L. Kvaglia rightly write that one of the key problems is the asymmetry of shocks affecting various participating countries. A single monetary policy may not be suitable for all countries, given their different economic structures. Balancing national interests and the collective goals of the eurozone poses challenges to achieving deeper integration. In addition, issues of solidarity and burden-sharing during crises cause discussions about the responsibility of economically strong States to those who are experiencing difficulties. [7, c. 1562]

Globalization has significantly affected the economic prospects of the EU. By opening up new markets and opportunities, it has at the same time exposed the EU to global economic fluctuations. [4, p. 1243] Trade tensions between major economies, such as the United States and China, may affect the EU economy due to its interconnectedness. In addition, the digital revolution has created problems of data protection, intellectual property rights and the future of labor, which requires the adaptation of EU economic policy. [8,]

Globalization has opened up new horizons for the EU, allowing it to gain access to broader markets for goods and services. The removal of trade barriers and the expansion of supply chains have accelerated economic growth. The EU is generally positive about globalization, emphasizing the need to adapt to changing consumer preferences and technological progress. By supporting innovative industries and facilitating the conclusion of international trade agreements, the EU seeks to take advantage of globalization. [9, c. 48]

However, globalization also exposes the EU to the risk of trade tensions and geopolitical uncertainty. The growth of protectionist measures by major economies such as the United States and China has disrupted global trade flows.[10] In this regard, the EU advocates a multilateral approach, protects a rules-based trading system, and is looking for alternative partnership options to mitigate the effects of trade disputes.

The digital revolution is changing the economy and society all over the world. The EU's point of view on technological progress is focused on using the potential of digital transformation to increase competitiveness. Initiatives such as the "Digital Single Market" are aimed at creating a harmonized regulatory environment that allows the EU to benefit from digital innovation while ensuring data privacy and security. [7, c. 1565]

External factors, such as climate change and environmental problems, encourage the EU to focus on the future. The EU's commitment to environmental sustainability is consistent with global efforts to combat climate change. The ambitious Green Deal initiative is an example of the EU's desire to move to a zero-carbon economy, as well as to stimulate the development of green technologies and jobs. [11, p. 45]

The EU's views on externalities and globalization emphasize the recognition of the need for sustainability and adaptation. In the face of rapid changes in the world, the EU is exploring the possibilities of diversifying supply chains, improving energy security and reducing dependence on critical imports. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the importance of self-sufficiency and strategic autonomy in the most important industries. [12, p. 621]

In a world shaped by external factors and globalization, the EU's prospects are dynamic and promising. The EU's approach involves taking advantage of the opportunities of globalization and actively countering its challenges, such as trade tensions and environmental degradation. By giving preference to innovation, sustainable development and strategic independence, the EU seeks to position itself as a sustainable and adaptable global player. As the EU overcomes the tangled web of external dynamics, its views on these factors continue to change, guided by the desire for unity, prosperity and common values.

In its future trajectory, the EU pays great attention to innovation and technological progress. [13, p. 43] In connection with the development of the digital economy and the fourth industrial revolution, the EU plans to create a single market integrated into the digital environment, which will promote the development of research, entrepreneurship and the introduction of new technologies. Initiatives such as Horizon Europe highlight the EU's commitment to funding research and innovation with a focus on sustainable solutions to global challenges.[14. p. 25]

Sustainability is the cornerstone of the EU's future development trajectory. An example of the EU's commitment to combating climate change is the Green Deal, a comprehensive plan to turn Europe into the world's first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Through policy measures, investments in renewable energy sources and the development of a circular economy, the EU seeks to lead the transition to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly future.

Given the changing balance of power in the world, the EU seeks to strengthen its geopolitical influence and establish a strategic partnership. The EU's prospects presuppose a commitment to a multilateral approach, advocating global cooperation on issues such as trade, security and human rights. Strengthening relations with key partners such as the United States and interaction with emerging economies demonstrate the EU's desire to form a more stable and interconnected world.

The future development trajectory of the EU also presupposes the priority of social sustainability and inclusivity. The lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of health systems, social guarantees and a sustainable workforce. [15] The EU's prospects presuppose the creation of a fair and inclusive society that empowers its citizens, supports democratic values and eliminates socio-economic differences between member countries.

Despite the ambitious future trajectory of the EU, it is not without difficulties. The EU must address issues such as demographic shifts, migration pressures and the consequences of technological shocks. The prospects for adaptation involve investing in education and training, managing migration on the basis of compassion and solidarity, as well as ensuring that the benefits of technological progress are widely disseminated. [16]

The future development trajectory of the European Union is determined by a multifaceted perspective encompassing innovation, sustainability, geopolitical influence and social sustainability. Focusing on these components, the EU seeks to build a prosperous, environmentally friendly and interconnected future in which global problems will be solved, while remaining faithful to its core values - unity, democracy and human rights. In a rapidly changing world, the EU's prospects reflect its desire to build a better future for its citizens and the global community.

In conclusion, it should be noted that the economic prospects of the EU are the result of its desire for integration, adaptation to globalization and response to internal and external challenges. The single market and the eurozone represent significant achievements, but imbalances and vulnerabilities persist. The EU's ability to address these challenges by promoting innovation and sustainability will determine its economic trajectory in an increasingly complex world.

References
1. Kaveshnikov, N. Y. (2020). Integration and disintegration in the European Union: development scenarios. Crisis and post-crisis: people, institutions, practices. collection of articles of the Interdisciplinary Scientific Online Conference. Tyumen.
2. Di Gregorio, A. (2016). Crisis of the Rule of Law in the New EU Member States. Conflictology / nota bene, 4, 241-251.
3. Voltolini, B., Natorski, M., & Hay, C. (2020). The politicisation of permanent crisis in Europe. Journal of European Integration, 42(5).
4. Nielsen, B., & Smeets, S. The role of the EU institutions in establishing the Banking Union. Collaborative leadership in the EMU reform process. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9), 1233–1256
5. Balyuk, I. A., & Balyuk, M. A. (2021). The problem of external debt of the European Union. World of new economics, 15(2), 53.
6. Rudneva, A. O. (2022). Key external shocks determining the positive dynamics of inflation in the Eurozone in the period from January 2019 to March 2022. Economics and Entrepreneurship, 3(140).
7. Howarth, D., & Quaglia, L. (2021). Failing forward in Economic and Monetary Union: Explaining weak eurozone financial support mechanisms. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(10), 1560-1575.
8. Romanova, T. A. (2021). Discourse on the sovereignty of the European Union: content and consequences. Modern Europe, 5(105), 32-44.
9. Ryzhov, V. B. (2018). European Union: dynamics of development and accumulated problems. International Law and International Organizations, 2, 42-50.
10. Portansky, A. P. (2019). Imperative of WTO reform in the era of growing protectionism and trade wars. Bulletin of International Organizations: Education, Science, New Economy, 14(2), 304-318.
11. Kaveshnikov, N. Y. (2018). European Union: economic growth without energy consumption growth? Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of the Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4(4), 41-49.
12. Kassim, H. (2023). The European Commission and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(4), 612–634.
13. Zinovieva, E. S., & Bulva, V. I. (2021). Digital sovereignty of the European Union. Modern Europe, 2(102), 40-49.
14. Tsirenshchikov, V. S. (2021). Strategy of the EU international cooperation in the field of scientific research and innovation. European Union: facts and comments, 104, 22-26.
15. Ladi, S., & Tsarouhas, D. (2020). EU economic governance and COVID-19: Policy learning and windows of opportunity. Journal of European Integration, 42(8), 1041–1056.
16. Sekacheva, A. B. (2021). Crisis phenomena in the economy of the European Union at the current stage of its developmen.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The scientific article "Problems and Prospects of the European Union" submitted for review is a study of the actual problems of the development of economic and legal problems and the search for their solutions for the prospects of economic development of the European Union. When writing the article, the author/authors used the current scientific literature of Russian and foreign authors of recent years. This circumstance speaks in favor of the qualitative characteristics of the scientific article, manifested in the indication of their positions within the framework of the study with elements of scientific discussion. Meanwhile, some structural and methodological shortcomings should be noted. We believe, in particular, that the authors, unfortunately, failed to identify the purpose and objectives of the study, its methodological characteristics, including research methods, approaches, etc. However, there is a general impression that the author's methodology was nevertheless implemented in the process of preparing a scientific article. The article also lacks any practical recommendations. The significance of the results of scientific research for the theory of science and the possibility of using it in the educational process is not indicated. The article is not divided into blocks, the writing style is largely evaluative and analytical in nature. It has a practical orientation. The article is able to arouse readers' interest in a meaningful way. It is informative, but, at the same time, does not contain solid factual material or data. The author/authors of the article identify the main problems of the economic development of the European Union, among which the following are highlighted: problems of monetary policy, fiscal policy, devaluation of their own currencies and not very effective governance at the institutional level. It is suggested that it is necessary to develop an integrated approach to the development and development of the above-mentioned policies for the effective development of economies in the member states of the European Union. The necessity of developing a unified approach to the protection of consumer rights, economic norms and digital rights is also shown. To date, the EU's established approach involves taking advantage of the opportunities of globalization and actively countering trade tensions, environmental degradation, etc. In the article, the author/authors say nothing about the current economic threats to the EU, resulting from the introduction of anti-Russian economic sanctions against the Russian Federation. However, it is quite possible that the author's scientific design did not assume an appropriate emphasis. The importance of regulatory legal regulation of complex aspects of the economic development of the European Union is also determined. The conclusions presented in the conclusion could be more extended. Thus, based on the analysis of the article, it can be concluded that it has a certain scientific value. The article can be recommended for publication, subject to a small revision related to the refinement of the research methodology, including research methods, research approaches, etc.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.