Статья 'Мультикультурализм и запрет аргумента ad hominem в научной дискуссии' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Kuznetsov, YU. V. Multiculturalism and Prohibition of Ad Hominen Argument in Academic Discussion

Abstract: The article studies prospects of transformation of the scientific rationality concept into prohibition of ad hominem argument, the latter entering into conflict with the wide spread ideology of multiculturalism that denies orientation at a universal subject. In the course of the analysis the author discovers the following two scenarios: implementation of anti-global tendencies in the form of antiscientism and another expansion of borders set forth by scientific rationalism.


Keywords:

philosophy, ad hominen argument, multiculturalism, rationality, globalization, argumentation, antiscientism, mainstream culture, academic discussion, universal and unique.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Alekseev A.P. Filosofskiy tekst. Idei, argumentatsiya, obrazy / A.P. Alekseev. M.: Progress-Tra-ditsiya, 2006. 328 s.
2. Benkhabib S. Prityazaniya kul'tury. Ravenstvo i raznoobrazie v global'nuyu eru / Seyla Benkhabib; Tsentr issled. postindustrial'nogo obshchestva. M.: Logos, 2003. 289 c.
3. Brunner K. Predstavlenie o cheloveke. Kontseptsiya sotsiuma: dva podkhoda k ponimaniyu obshchestva // Thesis. 1993. T. 1, vyp. 3. S. 51-72.
4. Voznyakevich E.E. Diskussiya o novoy paradigme gumanitarnykh nauk // Voprosy filosofii. 2007. № 12. S. 171-175.
5. Voznyakevich E.E. Nauchnaya refleksiya i formirovanie samosoznaniya molodogo uchenogo // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta tekhnologii i dizayna. Seriya 3. Ekonomiche-skie, gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki. 2010. № 3. S. 56-62.
6. Ivanov L.Yu. Tekst nauchnoy diskussii: deyksis i otsenka / L.Yu. Ivanov. M.: NIP «2R», 2003. 208 s.
7. Ivin A.A. Argumentatsiya teoreticheskaya // Filosofiya: entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / pod red. A.A. Ivina. M.: Gardariki, 2004. S. 32.
8. Kasavin I.T. Tekst. Diskurs. Kontekst. Vvedenie v sotsial'nuyu epistemologiyu yazyka / I.T. Kasavin. M.: Kanon+, 2008. 544 s.
9. Kleyner G.B. Evolyutsiya institutsional'nykh sistem. M.: INFRA-M, 2004. 324 s.
10. Kuropyatnik A.I. Mul'tikul'turalizm: problemy sotsial'noy stabil'nosti polietnicheskikh obshchestv. SPb: Izd-vo SPbGU, 2000 208 s.
11. Tishkov V.A. Teoriya i praktika mul'tikul'turalizma // Mul'tikul'turalizm i transformatsiya postsovetskikh obshchestv / Pod red. V.S. Malakhova, V.A. Tishkova. M., 2002. S. 332-336.
12. Ushanova I.A. Globalizatsiya i mul'tikul'turalizm: puti razvitiya // Vestnik novgorodskogo gosu-darstvennogo universiteta. № 27. S. 61-65.
13. Fedotova V.G. Edinstvo i mnogoobrazie kul'tur v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. № 9. S. 46-53.
14. Cole J.R. The paradox of individual particularism and institutional universalism // Social Science Information. London: SAGE, Newbury Park, 1989. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 51-76.
15. Fisher A. The Logic of Real Arguments / A. Fisher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 190 p.
16. Johnstone H.W. Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument: An Outlook in Transition / H.W. Johnstone. University Park; Pa.: Dialogue Press of Man & World, 1978. 150 p.
17. Naess A. Communication and argument: elements of applied Semantics / A. Naess. Oslo: Oslo University Press, 1966. 298 p.
18. Pickus N.M.J. Creating Citizens for the 21st Century // Immigration and Citizenship in the 21st Century / Ed. by N.M.J. Pickus. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998. P. 107-139.
19. Semenovsky Y. The uses of argument / Y. Semenovsky. Lyon, Presses Universitaires de Lyon, 2003. 224 p
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.