Статья 'Символ как образ и понятие (Полемический отклик на замечания проф. В.А. Подороги)' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Spirova, E. M. Symbol as an Image and Concept (Response to V. A. Podoroga’s Comments)

Abstract: The article talks about a symbol as a concept of philosophical anthropology. The author tries to show a double function of a symbol which can act both as an image and a concept. Such interpretation of symbol was supported by the members of the Thesis Board when the author defended his thesis for a Doctor’s degree. At the same time, the thesis arose many discussions and debates. In this article the author is answering questions asked by Valery Alexandrovich Podoroga during defense who noted that symbol was closer to an image than a philosophical concept.


Keywords:

philosophy, symbol, concept, philosophical anthropology, image, mystics, analysis.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bibikhin V.V. Yazyk filosofii. M., 2002.
2. Bryuning V. Filosofskaya antropologiya. Istoricheskie predposylki i sovremennoe sostoyanie. Berlin, 1960.
3. Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika. V 4-kh t. T. 3. M., 1968-1971.
4. Gegel' G.V.F. Estetika. T. 2. M., 1969.
5. Gershenshon M. Gol'fstrem // Liki kul'tury. Al'manakh. Tom 1. M., 1995.
6. Gurevich P.S. Estetika. Uchebnoe posobie. M., 2011.
7. Kormin N.A. Metafizicheskiy simvolizm. Chast' 1. M., 2011.
8. Mamardashvili M.K., Pyatigorskiy A.M. Simvol i soznanie. Metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o so-znanii, simvolike i yazyke. M., 1997.
9. Nansi Zhan-Zhak. Psikhoanaliz // Filosofskiy zhurnal. M., 2011. S. 70.
10. Pomerants G. Dve modeli poznaniya // Pomerants Grigoriy. Vykhod iz transa. M., 2010. S. 41.
11. Stevenson L., Khaberman D. Desyat' teoriy o prirode cheloveka M., 2004.
12. Sycheva S.G. Problema simvola v filosofii. Tomsk, 2000.
13. Tarnapol'skaya G.M. Energiynaya dialektika ontogeneza simvola. Tomsk, 2009.
14. Khrenov N.A. Ot epokhi bessoznatel'nogo mifotvorchestva k epokhe refleksii o mife // Mif i khudo-zhestvennoe soznanie XX veka. M., 2011. S. 14.
15. Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. M., 1997.
16. Yaspers K. Obshchaya psikhopatologiya. M., 1997
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.