Модель эволюции мироздания в философии глобального конституционализма

Гончаров Виталий Викторович

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2016.10.20200


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Goncharov V.V. Model of evolution of the universe in philosophy of global constitutionalism // Philosophy and Culture. 2016. № 10. P. 1454-1461. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.10.20200 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20200

Модель эволюции мироздания в философии глобального конституционализма

Goncharov Vitalii Viktorovich

PhD in Law

Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Higher Education, Polytechnic Institute (branch), Don State Technical University in Taganrog

347900, Russia, Rostov region, Taganrog, Petrovskaya str., 109a

niipgergo2009@mail.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Philosophy of law"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.10.20200

Received:

24-08-2016

Published:

14-11-2016

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the model of evolution of the universe in philosophy of global constitutionalism. The model of evolution of the universe in any socio-philosophical concept suggest the formulation and substantiation of its own construct of formation and development of the surrounding reality (material and immaterial world). The philosophy of global constitutionalism conclusively formed at the brink of the XX and XX centuries as an active instrument of formatting of the socio-political, state-legal, and financial-economic development of the modern national state under in hands of the global ruling class, is based on the experience of the socio-philosophical concepts of the past, namely neoliberal and neoconservative doctrines. The author explores the signs of the model of evolution of the universe in philosophy of global constitutionalism, and suggests that various models of evolution of the universe play an important role in the context of globalization of the socio-political, state-legal, and financial-economic development of the existing national states and societies, which are being actively studied by the contemporary scholars, philosophers, legal experts, and political scientists. The following models are being considered: : linear globalization (A. Comte); world of system of globalization (I. Wallerstein, A. G. Frank, S. Amin, J. Arrighi, T. dos Santos, A. I. Fursov, A. V. Karataev); globalization as continuation of modernization (A. Giddens); global system (L. Sklair), and others.

Keywords:

model, evolution, creation, philosophy, global, constitutionalism, international, local, state, person

References

1. Vasil'ev B.V. Filosofiya prava russkogo neoliberalizma kontsa XIX-nachala XX veka: diss. … doktora filosofskikh nauk.-Sankt-Peterburg, 2005.-S. 5-15.
2. Posadskii A. Neoliberalizm i ekologizm. Razvernutye tezisy doklada na Sobornykh slushaniyakh VRNS po teme «Ekonomika v usloviyakh globalizatsii. Natsional'nyi vzglyad».-[Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.vrns.ru/analytics/4197/#.V7sxs49OLIU (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
3. Shashkin P.A. Suverennaya demokratiya v konturakh novogo mirovogo poryadka. Khristianskii vzglyad na sovremennye problemy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya.-[Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.perspektivy.info/print.php?ID=35961 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
4. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Ideya evolyutsii i global'nyi evolyutsionizm.-[Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.socionauki.ru/news/158140 (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
5. Kristol I. Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea.-New York, 1995.-P. 37.
6. Kristol W., Kagan R. Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy // Foreign Affairs.-July/August 1996.-P. 1-2.
7. Vystuplenie Svyateishego Patriarkha Kirilla v Kievo-Pecherskoi lavre na vstreche s arkhiereyami, dukhovenstvom, monashestvuyushchimi, miryanami, prepodavatelyami i studentami Kievskoi dukhovnoi akademii [Elektronnyi istochnik].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/707274.html (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
8. Næss A. Interpretation and preciseness. II. Mimeographed.-Oslo 1948, 57 pp.
9. Næss A. Ecology, community, and lifestyle, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989.-348 p.
10. Ivanov D.V. Evolyutsiya kontseptsii globalizatsii.-[Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://val--s.narod.ru/glob/gl_ivanov1.htm (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2016).
11. Kont O. Obshchii obzor pozitivizma / Perevod s frantsuzskogo I. A. Shapiro. Pod red. E.L. Radlova.-Izd. 2-e.-M.: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2011.-296 s.
12. Vallerstain E. Analiz mirovykh sistem i situatsiya v sovremennom mire. / Per s angl. P. M. Kudyukina pod obshchei red. B. Yu. Kagarlitskogo.-SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2001.-416 s.
13. Amin Samir. Virus liberalizma. Permanentnaya voina i amerikanizatsiya mira.-M. «Evropa».-2007.-S. 10-13.
14. Frank A.G. The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? 1993.-S. 20-23.
15. Arrigi D. Globalizatsiya i istoricheskaya makrosotsiologiya // Prognozis.-2008.-№ 2.-S. 57-72.
16. Dos Santos T. Socialismo o fascismo. El nuevo caracter de la dependencia y el dilema latinoamericano. Buenos Aires, 1973.-S. 34-40.
17. Fursov A.I. Mir, kotoryi my pokidaem, mir, v kotoryi my vstupaem, i mir mezhdu nimi (Kapital(izm) i Modern-skhvatka skeletov nad propast'yu?) // De futuro, ili Istoriya budushchego.-Moskva: Politicheskii klass; AIRO-XXI, 2008.-S. 255-304.
18. Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity.-Stanford, 1990.-P. 60, 63, 64, 71.
19. Sklair L. Sociology of the Global System.-Hemel Hempstead, 1991.-P. 7.
20. Therborn G. European Modernity and Beyond: The Trajectory of European Societies 1945-2000.-London, 1995.-P. 738-739.
21. Bauman Z. Globalization: The Human Consequences.-Cambridge, 1998.-136 p.
22. Lash S., Urry J. Economies of Signs and Space.-London, 1994.-360 p.
23. Robertson R. Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity // Global Modernities. Ed. by M. Featherstone, S. Lash, R. Robertson.-London, 1995.-P. 25-42.
24. Bek U. Obshchestvo riska: Na puti k drugomu modernu.-M., 2000.-383 s.
25. Appadurai A. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy // Global Culture. Ed. by M. Featherstone.-London, 1990.-P. 295-310.
26. Kont O. Dukh pozitivnoi filosofii: Slovo o polozhitel'nom myshlenii. Per. s fr.-Izd. 2-e.-M.: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2011.-80 s.
27. Beck U. Was ist Globalisierung? Frankfurt a.-M., 1998.-S. 28, 40, 42, 44, 131.
28. Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization.-Minneapolis, 1996.-P. 178-199.
29. E.M. Spirova Adler o raskolotosti chelovecheskogo bytiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2010. - 2. - C. 51 - 56.
30. S.F. Udartsev Evolyutsiya idei evropeiskogo edinstva
i opyt ee realizatsii v modelyakh gosudarstvennogo
ustroistva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 11. - C. 1925 - 1932.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.