Статья 'О подходах к изучению древнегреческой софистики' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

О подходах к изучению древнегреческой софистики

Matveichev Oleg Anatol'evich

PhD in Philosophy

professor of the Department of Philosophy at National Research University 'Higher School of Economics'

123007, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Myasnitskaya, 20, kab. 355

OM777777@MAIL.RU
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.4.18699

Received:

08-04-2016


Published:

14-06-2016


Abstract: A Special attention in this article is given to the study of the Ancient Greek sophistry established by the XIX-XX century. The author underlines that there is a consensus of indifference and neglect within the historical-philosophical science with regards to the sophists. The two different ways of reconstruction of the “systems” and outlooks, existed at that time in philosophy, are being proposed. The first way consists in the reconstruction of the teacher “system” through the follower; and the second way consists in the in-depth interpretation of the present fragments, which tries to leave the vulgar interpretations, emerging from the initial orientation on the primitivism of the Greeks, outside the framework. Thus, we can build a genealogical tree of the early Greek philosophers. The main conclusion lies in the fact that over the last decades the attempts were made in rehabilitation of the sophists. In particular, such attempt was made by Barbara Cassin, but her post-modernist approach cannot be fully recognized as satisfactory, because she rejects the ontology of the sophists in favor of the rhetoric. The author comes to an understanding that the sophists give us a so-called “ontology of imagination”, a more initial ontology, than the ontology of traditional metaphysics with its millenary separation into “visible and invisible”, into the “world of senses and world of ideas”.


Keywords:

Ancient Greek philosophers, sophistry, metaphysics, history of philosophy, interpretation, philosophical thought, founders of Sciences, irreligiousness, Greek world, criticism

References
1. Akimov O. E. Donauchnye formy: Mify i filosofiya. Estestvoznanie. T. 1. Komsomol'sk-na-Amure: Izd-vo Komsomol'skogo-na-Amure Gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, 1996. 430 s.
2. Aristotel'. O sofisticheskikh oproverzheniyakh // Aristotel'. Sobr. soch. v 4-kh t. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1978. S. 533-593.
3. Belyakov A., Matveichev O. Troyanskii kon' zapadnoi istorii. SPb.: Piter, 2014. 224 s.
4. Vinkel'man I. I. Istoriya iskusstva drevnosti // Vinkel'man I. I. Istoriya iskusstva drevnosti. Malye sochineniya. SPb.: Aleteiya, Gosudarstvennyi Ermitazh, 2000. S. 7-302.
5. Gegel' G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 1. Nauka logiki. M.: Mysl', 1974. 452 s.
6. Gegel' G. V. F. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. T. 1. SPb.: Nauka, 1993. 350 s.
7. Gegel' G. V. F. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. T. 2. SPb.: Nauka, 1994. 424 s.
8. Gel'derlin F. Giperion. M.: Nauka, 1988. 720 s.
9. Golosovker Ya. E. Imaginativnyi Absolyut // Golosovker Ya. E. Izbrannoe. Logika mifa. M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2010. S. 7-222.
10. Gomperts T. Grecheskie mysliteli. T.1. SPb.: Aleteiya, 1999. 605 s.
11. Ieger V. Paideiya. Vospitanie antichnogo greka. T. 1. M.: Greko-latinskii kabinet Yu. A. Shichalina, 2001. 594 s.
12. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. SPb.: Tip. M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1907. VIII, 464 s.
13. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. 2-e izd. SPb.: Tip. M.M. Stasyulevicha. 1915. VIII, 464 s.
14. Kassen B. Effekt sofistiki. M., SPb: Moskovskii filosofskii fond; Universitetskaya kniga. 2000. 240 s.
15. Ksenofont. Vospominaniya o Sokrate. M.: Nauka, 1993. 380 s.
16. Rassel B. Istoriya zapadnoi filosofii. T. 1. Novosibirsk: Sib. univ. izd-vo; Izd-vo Novosib. un-ta, 2001. 992 s.
17. Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya: vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki. M.: Nauka, 1998. 751 s.
18. Khaidegger M. Chto eto takoe – filosofiya? // Voprosy filosofii. 1993. № 8. S. 113-123.
19. Khaidegger M. Fenomenologicheskie interpretatsii Aristotelya (Ekspozitsiya germenevticheskoi situatsii). SPb.: ITs «Gumanitarnaya Akademiya», 2012. 224 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.